CHAPTER TWENTY-ONE
All Party Meet
- 13th November, 1991Chasing
the mirage of political process, the Home Minister, S B. Chavan, resorted
to the freak of summoning all shades of Kashmir leaders for a meet designed
to explore the possibilities of initiating political activity in the terror-stricken
Valley of Kashmir. The invitation letters addressed to them by the Home
Ministry circles focussed among other things on the migration of large
sections of the Kashmirian populace from the Valley as a result of escalation
in terrorist violence and mayhem.
The political
leaders affiliated to National Conference and Congress were the same old
faces. who could be held guilty of abdication and non-governance at a critical
juncture when menace of terrorism and subversion was swamping Kashmir.
Resorting to myopic options and mis-conceived and unfounded perceptions,
they had willingly and knowingly contributed to the crumbling and perishment
of administration paving way for primitive savagery inherent in terrorism.
Malice and communal venom ever on their tongues, they led to the birth
and nurture of hopes in the mass psyche that Azadi and secession of the
state from the Indian democracy was a sustainable and attainable political
objective. The same set of leaders had forged alliances with the venomous
Jamaat-i-Islami for short-term political gains, thus allowing it to proliferate
like a cancerous cell. Mir. Qasim, Mufti Sayyid, G.N. Azad, M.L. Fotedar
and Rajesh Pilot as the big-wigs attending the meet reduced it to a jamboree
of politicians enjoying or having enjoyed carnival of power and pelf. Most
of the leaders sharing different perceptions about the political conditions
prevailing in Kashmir found a forum to pontificate on a situation which
they as rulers had created and allowed to assume menacing dimensions.
What was regrettable
that the Kashmirian Hindus living in exile and the worst victims of Muslim
barbarity were side-lined by not inviting them to participate in the meet.
l They were both surprised and shocked at the brusque and ham-handed treatment
meted out to them by the Home Ministry circles. They felt that they were
being tiffed as they have a saga to relate, a statement to make and a view-point
to project. As per them, initiation of political process is an exercise
in futility until ground realities in Kashmir undergo a sea-change and
Muslim terrorism is stamped out to the last vestiges of it. That deliberations
of any form debating the future course of developments in Kashmir are vitally
related to their survival is what they firmly hold. Motivated by partisan
considerations, the Home Minister brushed aside the resentment of the Kashmirian
Hindus articulated through their fora on the untenable plea that they had
no presence in the valley. Sensing the plea pointless and not cognet, the
Kashmirian Hindus were prompt enough to rivet the attention of the Home
Minister to the entire flock of Kashmir leaders, who have fled their land
only to make Jammu and Delhi as their sanctuaries.
The Home Minister
organising a typical Congress brand exercise persevered to listen to the
non-perceptive views of the N.C. and Congress-I leaders about the prevalent
situation in Kashmir. As doomsmen of Kashmir, the N.C. Ieaders presented
a dubious stand-point of involving the sectarian and terrorist-infested
administration of Kashmir in meeting and fighting the formidable challenges
posed by Muslim terrorism. They were mostly mute about the heinous crimes
committed by the Muslim terrorists and the hounding out of the Hindu minority
from Kashmir. That the terrorists are misguided and need be conciliated
was the usual fare they dished out at the meet. The Janata Dal leaders
with their track record of bunglings in Kashmir failed to offer a solid
view-point thus exhibiting total lack of perception about the turmoil enveloping
Kashmir. Presenting a rehash of happenings in Kashmir, content-wise not
different from that of N.C., the Congress leaders stressed the firm tackling
of terrorism in Kashmir and also opening up of channels of dialogue with
the Muslim terrorists for a solution within the ambit of Indian Constitution.
That the terrorists having risen in revolt and decimated all traces of
state authority letting loose a reign of terror need total annihilation
is not within the Congress ken. Terrorists have no love lost for the Indian
Constitution and are out to fragment the country and are averse to a solution
within the parameters of the Constitution. Operating at the behest of a
neighbouring country, they are waging a proxy war, which has to be fought
as per the canons of war. When vanquished, the Muslim terrorists along
with their local collaborators will beg for a solution, call it a face-saving.
'Tackle terrorism and open up channels of dialogue' can be dismissed as
illogical verbiage.
As the victims
of Muslim hegemony, the BJP leaders from Jammu region were sufficiently
frank in demanding the trifurcation of the state only to loosen the strangle-hold
on Jammu and Ladakh by the Muslim bigots ruling the state. The C.P.I. (M)
leader from Kashmir with a consistent history of having fought Jamaat-i-Islami
agitprop stuck to the position of differentiating the JKLF barbarians from
the Hizbul-Mujalideen blood-hounds when both the species owe allegiance
to the uniform agenda of decimating Hindu minorities as Kafirs with no
place for them in Independent Kashmir which is co-terminus with annexation
to Pakistan. That killers are secularists, a quaint thesis, sounds astounding.
Aware of the
pell-mell created by the N.C.-Congress combine in Kashmir. the Home Minister
cautioned all the participants not to resort to harangues only to stall
the worsening situation from touching an irretrievable bottom. He also
dilated on the insidious and disruptive role-model of Pakistan in matters
of interfering, aiding and abetting terrorism in Kashmir, training the
terrorists in lethal weapons, lacing them with arms and ammunition, financial
support and strategic assistance. What his government was doing to weed
out terrorism from the Valley did not form a vital item for his dilation
and explication.
The 'All Party
Meet' was a snap decision only to camouflage the inaction of a government,
which is in office, but not in power. It practically proved a damp squib
as it failed to throw up a tangible strategy as a means to counter the
insurgency challenging the fundamentals sustaining the Indian democracy.
The resolution unanimously accepted by the leaders lent all credence and
support to the so-called policies pursued by the Central Government to
meet the armed revolt. A brief reference to the Hindu refugees herded out
of Kashmir living an appalling life in tents and shanties failed to envisage
any positive measures designed to alleviate their untold sufferings and
unbearable miseries. That the properties of the Hindus are vengefully being
destroyed or grabbed by the Muslim majority was not cognised as a major
concern by the wreckers of Kashmir attending the meet.
Pinning his
hopes in the Kashmir brand of leaders present at the meet proved to the
hilt that the Home Minister was only groping in the dark and was intensly
frantic to catch at a straw designed to retrieve a situation that had come
up only as an end-product of abdication, non-assertion and more than most
non-governance. If he expected the destroyers of Kashmir to prove the saviours
of Kashmir, it is safe to put that he was chasing a chimmera or a pipe-dream.
That the Kashmirian
Hindus rendered refugees in their own country should be brushed aside by
the powers that be was what exhausted their patience and evoked their ire.
With a view to registering their protest, they demonstrated at the Parliament
House Annexe and vigorously demanded their participation in all meets and
parleys debating future of Kashmir. The dehumanised face of the government
got openly revealed when it came heavy on the demonstrators by charging,
beating and manhandling them only to break their resistance to the apathetic
and unfair treatment being meted out to them. The scars inflicted on them
are the badges of honour that will stand in good stead in the battle for
transforming the destinies of millions for a better future ensuring an
even-handed treatment to the sons of the soil suffering worst pains and
agonies, not of their making.
If broadened
in its range and scope, the 'All Party Meet' could be a meaningful and
relevant exercise in matters of furrowing a track to meet the Muslim insurgency
in Kashmir. Clinging to partisan interests will not prove fruitful in solving
Kashmir allowed to get intertwined in a maze of controversies. The political
pundits keenly watching Kashmir developments are fully aware of the failure
of the exercise at a time when Central government has yet to establish
its writ in the belts of territory outside Raj Bhawan. And the main failure
of the 'All Party Meet' exercise was in not sending out a loud and clear
message to the Muslim terrorists that they will be met and Kashmir will
never move out of the Indian orbit. It never proved a conduit for a stiff
message to all hues of disruptionists, both internal and external. Instead,
the story of the Indian Government in strife torn Valley is abominable
and detestable. It has committed the security forces to meet the perilous
challenges of armed insurgency, but does not allow them to act by tying
up their hands behind their backs.
Have the ground
realities in strifetorn valley undergone a metamorphic change necessitating
the initiation of political process? 2 Have terrorists been brought to
their knees by launching upon a vigorous crusade against them to clean
the hate-defiled soil of Kashmir? Tho fact of the matter is that terrorism
ravaging the Valley is no longer contained in its fury and frequency. The
writ of the terrorists runs unabated. They have not ceased to call the
shots. The ominous nexus between the Muslim terrorists and the administration
is yet to be broken.
The state administrative
set-up as the support plank of terrorism in Kashmir continues to be in
stinking health. The bogey of human rights violations as the agitprop of
internal and external forces inimical to the sovereignty and solidarity
of India continues to damage and impair the morale and fighting potential
of the security forces. Donning the eunuch's clothing, the Central Government
unable to withstand the pressures from a superpower playing the politics
of human rights pursues a policy of drift to the total erosion of national
security and prestige. Unless firm measures including waging a war on Pakistan
are resorted to, Kashmir will continue burning in the fires of terrorism,
subversion, disorder and mayhem.
Punching the
soft belly of the Indian Government, terrorists run amok under the frenzy
of Jehad have thrown no signals for a negotiated sertlement. Yet the policy
framing mandarins, senile and spineless, lacking in conviction and political
will, continuously harp on the tune of a settlement within the parameters
of the Indian Constitution. And the Government at the Centre has made history
by resorting to quaint, grotesque and mind-boggling methods and strategies
to fight terrorisnn in Kashmir.
It is said
that fruit is being purchased from the apple-sheikhs feeding insurgency
with all their resources at their door-steps and money paid in cash. Handicrafts
are bought from the barons in the sector at their thresholds and ninety
percent payments made on spot. The insurgent Muslims are being blessed
with job slots and jobs are being created to absorb them in hordes. The
boatmen are reportedly paid doles in cash. House-boat barons as parts of
Muslim terrorism are reported to be in receipt of hefty doles with a view
to sustainning them as a resistant force. How could hoteliers be ignored
? They are also paid relief as they are held as the worst victims of the
insurgency which they have been assiduously feeding. The bus- owners were
reportedly paid Rs. 500/- each to clear the decks of their buses of snow
as every snow-fall is declared a national calamity. The government servants
are paid hefty salaries for keeping away from their duties. 'No work, no
pay' is not applicable to them. Whenever there is an apparent abatement
in terrorism, they go on a lightning strike only to ignite quenching fires.
The Chief Secretary expected to gear up the Muslimised administration has
dubious credentials. He is one of the signatories to an-appeal made to
the UNO for intervention in Kashmir. There is an ominous nexus between
the Muslimised administration and the terrorists. Government coffers are
mercilessly looted and there is no accountability worth the name. Most
of the looted money in their kitties, the Muslim terrorists have been busy
in building huge mobile and immobile properties. And to the naive Muslims,
they are still Mujahids waging holy war for the extirpation of Kufur (infidelity)
from Kashmir.
National
Integration Council - A Toothless Giant
Having come
into being as a highly prestigious body three decades ago, the National
Integration Council was designed to serve as a forum to deliberate upon
vital national issues with the sole objective of charting out strategies
to resolve them from broad national perspectives. The Council as such has
made history by deliberating upon very sensitive issues fraught with perils
for the national security. The usual modus operandi of the Council has
been to issue high sounding statements earning prime media focus. But what
has dismayed the Indian public is that the deliberations of the NIC have
never been congnised by the men in corridors of power while shaping policy
frames and iniliatives to meet the formidable challenges.
The Narsimha
Rao Government feeling jittery in face of the stridency exhibited by the
Bharatiya Janata Party apropos Kashmir convened the National Integration
Council with a view to deliberating upon the insurgencies in the Punjab
and Kashmir perhaps for a possible way-out to resolve the crises. Guided
by its likes and dislikes with respect to various political parties, the
ruling party decided to keep the communists away from the meet. It was
only after lodging a protest with the government that the CPI was formally
invited to the meet. Despite such bunglings at initial stages, many heavyweights
affiliated to the broad spectrum of national politics attended the meet.
That many business tycoons were invited to the meet was a pointer to the
role-model they were assigned in matters of determining the strategies
and policy initiatives vis-a-vis crucial problems facing the country. There
were many others, invited to the meet, owing allegiance to micro-outfits
with limited palitical operational base. Some individuals also were considered
relevent to the meet, but the Kashmirian Hindus, battered and bloodied,
herded out of their native land, were side-lined, thus de-recognized as
the bona fide citizens of India.
The 150-menlber
strong NIC was expected to deliberate upon the Kashmir turmoil in its broad
facets and evolve a national strategy to counter the proxy war waged by
Pakistan drawing support from local Muslim rabids. But, the meet was dishonestly
conceived and hence ended in smoke without evolving a strategy or a well-formulated
plan to meet the challenges of the Muslim insurgency. Clinging to their
party perceptions about the insurgencies, the politicians highlighted lop-sided
versions about the origins of terrorism ravaging the two states in full
fury and dished out stale cliches as possible solutions to end the crises.
As per the
pre-drawn agenda of the NIC meeting, the Kashmir imbroglio failed to attract
an exclusive attention of the political big-wigs and business tycoons as
it was clubbed with the Punjab insurgency, thus diluting the prime importance
of Kashmir insurgency replete with wide ranging ramifications for the country
at large. The P.M. crafted its further dilution when he chose to allude
to the Cauvery water dispute and exodus of refugees from Tamil Nadu and
Karnataka. The handful of refugees from the two southern states formed
his concern, but, dismaying as it is, the trauma of the Kashmirian Hindus
as a result of ethnic cleansing resorted to by the Muslim fundamentalists
never attracted his serious attention. In fact, the first resolution adopted
by the NIC as a high profile body was pertaining to Tamil Nadu and Karnataka
witnessing disturbances as a spill-over of water dispute between the two
states. Focussing on the dispute was only to swerve away from the main
agenda before the NIC meet. It can be averred that the Prime Minister motivated
by a design to fling Kashmir and Punjab to the backwaters dragged the rumpus
in the South into the deliberations of the NIC, thus reducing the prime
importance of the strife-ravaged states clamouring for a strategy as a
means to resolve the deep-set crises.
Absolutely
wanting in dynamism in matters of grapling with serious problems with intense
seriousness, the NIC forged a resolution on Kashmir and the Punjab presenting
a melange of views put forth by various political parties and many highbrow
political personalities only to give it a semblance of consensus. Far from
hitting the nail on the head, the resolution was replete with commonplace
generalisations and cliches with the least attempt to forge a concerted
and vigorous strategy based on absolute unanimity so as to meet the serious
challenges to the democratic polity of India.
Without learning
from past-mistakes, the Prime Minister stuck to the same old political
stand in regard to the highly controversial Article 370 of the Indian Constitution
ensuring special status to the people of Jammu and Kashmir. Not ready to
cognise the pernicious role of the Article 370 in breeding divisive and
fundamentalist forces in the state, the political leaders affiliated to
the Left and Centrist parties with the sole exception of Bharatiya Janata
Party were for retention of the Article 370 on the plea that its abrogation
would mark a harking back on the promise made to the people of Jammu and
Kashmir. The fact of the matter is that the Article 370 is a promise made
not to the Ladakhis, the Jammuites and other minority groups of the state,
but only to the Muslims of Kashmir. The Jammuites are for its immediate
scrapping. So are the Ladakhis, the worst victims of Muslim exploitation.
Dr. Murli Manohar Joshi representing the BJP was forthright in demanding
the abrogation of the Article as it has historically proved a formidable
barrier to the development of a cohesive nation transcending the regional
persuasions for separatism and insularity. The Article as such has bred
separatist forces out to snap the ties of Kashmir with India and also hounding
out of the indigenous Hindu minorities. It is a stumbling block in forging
a so-called consensus, the reference to the said Arlicle was finally dropped
thereby maintaining the Article as sacrosanct.
The Resolution
also exhorted all political parties to make their solid contributions to
the normalisation processes in Kashmir which is ravaged by armed Muslim
fundamentalism. Active involvement of all segments of the Kashmirian populace
was what the resolution emphasised in crystal-clear words. But, the Kashmirian
Hindus seeking participation in the deliberations were kept at bay, thus
evoking their wrath and anger.
On 31st December,
1991, a solid group of the Kashmirian Hindus in utter anguish got collected
at Jantar Mantar and marched in the direction of the Parliament House Annexe
where the NIC was in session in the Main Committee Room. It was not a smooth
sailing. They had to encounter several cordons and police hostilities.
Protesting that they be allowed to present a charter of demands to the NIC, the police posse, absolutely hostile and brutal, foiled the peaceful
march. The protesters raised slogans and also blocked traffic so as to
draw the attention of the people to the blighted lot of the Kashmirian
Hindus. That the NIC without their participation was not a representative
body to discuss and decide the fate of the refugees was what they endeavoured
to highlight. The brute fcrce let loose by the tyrannous government foiled
even the attempt to present a memorandum to the NIC meet debating the turmoil
in Kashmir. The protesters were forcibly dumped in police vans and whisked
away. They were also subjected to a brutal lathi-charge, thus silencing
them and preventing them from ventilating and highlighting their viewpoint
and saga.
Notes and
References
1. Sanjay Kumar,
Center's Kashmir Policy: "Side-lining KPS", Daily Excelsior, January 13,
14, 1992 2. Pran
Nath Azad, "Have Ground Realities Changed in Kashmir", Daily Excelsior,
October, 1992
|