Chapter 3
Crudities and Contradictions
"It is reason's pride to face reality when the
garment of make-believe has been stripped away"
Kashmir Valley, the hub
of present terrorist turmoil, is the most prosperous region of the country,
where per capita income is far too higher than in any part of the country
and much more above the national average. It is here that peasant proprietorship
is the rule rather than an exception, where education is free from primary
to university level, where loans or financial assistance from the Government
agencies and commercial banks can be had for a song, sans worrying for
ever about its repayment; where the central assistance on a per capita
basis is the highest in the country and where the Central Government has
always been very liberal to bestow grants and aid. The Valley, which only
a few decades back, used to export labour to the plains in hordes, is now
net importer of labour especially from Bihar and other states of the country.
The saga of sudden change from rags to riches in a few decades, is a landmark
unprecedented in the annals of the subcontinent's history and must be seen
to be believed.
The population of Kashmir Valley is around
30 lakhs (3 million) just equal to that of Trans-Yamuna area of Delhi.
For this small population, there is a silk factory, one of the biggest
in the world and also many smaller silk factories. There are woollen mills,
big and small and flourishing carpet factories, electronics goods and industries,
stainless steel and leather factories, fruit processing industries, H.M.T.
Watch factory, Indian Telephone Industry (ITI), cement factories, petroleum
processing units. Besides, there are large number of medium and small-scale
industries both in government and public sector.
Kashmir University has all the disciplines
in Science, Arts, Commerce, Law and Humanities besides exhaustive courses
for languages. There are a number of separate colleges for women. A Regional
Engineering College, one Government Medical College and one private Medical
College are also there. There is a separate Dental College. A prestigious
Institute of Medical Sciences (like A.I.I.M.S., New Delhi) has been established
in Srinagar. There are a number of Teachers' Training Colleges, Technology
and Engineering Institutes and other professional institutes in the Valley.
Kashmir Valley has a full fledged Agricultural
University and large number of research laboratories for silk, wool, rice,
mulberry, drugs etc. There is hardly any sphere of activity, which the
Central Government has undertaken either by itself or through the State
Governments, which has not been sponsored in the Valley. There has been
three times increase in Central assistance to Kashmir in the plan period
1984-89, which is not the case in other states. Similarly, per capita expenditure
on development activities in J&K is Rs.962/- as against Rs.270/- in
Bihar, Rs.490/- in Gujarat and Rs.822/- in Himachal Pradesh. Per capita
consumption of electricity is much higher than in other states.
People in Kashmir Valley have been provided
for the last 45 years, subsidised cheap food (perhaps cheapest in the world),
subsidised firewood, subsidised salts, subsidised pesticides for orchards,
subsidised agricultural pursuits, cheaper feeds for animals, liberal loans
for training in professional colleges outside the state (never returned),
huge subsidies for establishment of industrial units, liberal loans for
housing and what not. There is hardly any sphere of life where people of
Kashmir did not get preferential treatment. The population of the state
is just 0.8% of the country yet it received 2.7% of the national development
outlay. Thus, the per head allocation in case of this state amounted to
Rs.1122/- while the per head allocation in case of other states of the
country ranged between Rs.67/- and about Rs.300/-. Five Year Plans are
being totally financed by the Centre, as also assistance for staff salaries.
While in other parts of the country various states are getting central
assistance as 30 percent grants and 70 percent loans, Jammu and Kashmir
is among the most favoured parts where Central assistance is being given
as 90 percent grants and 10 percent as loan. In the country as a whole,
over 15 percent people are houseless but in Kashmir Valley every family
has got pucca house of its own. Such huge sums of money has been pumped
into the Kashmir Valley to the neglect of other two regions during all
these years that they have resulted in regional imbalances and regional
tension within the state.
The insurgency and terrorism has not affected
the prosperity of the Muslims of the Kashmir Valley. In fact, their prosperity
has increased due to their having taken away immovable assets and agricultural
property as also business establishments of the Hindus worth thousands
of crores of rupees. Massive loans taken from financial institutions have
not been returned. No taxes or Government dues are paid in the Valley.
Electricity charges, water bills, telephone bills, sales tax bills, sales
tax, excise duty nothing is paid to the Government. There is a general
impression that the economy of Kashmir Valley is heavily dependent on tourism.
This is not a fact. Tourism contributes just 10 percent to the state's
domestic production. The approximate number of people directly employed
in tourism is about 40,000. Most of the tourist activity is concentrated
in Srinagar and a few suburban areas where 79 percent of the people live
and work in rural areas. The bulk of the employment under tourism is low-
skill and relatively low-wage like the shikara and pony men, porters,
waiters, cooks drivers, etc. This is only a seasonal employment for about
120 days in a year. Export of handicrafts has also registered a phenomenal
growth in the last three years. This is particularly so with regard to
carpet and embroidery trade. Interests of smaller handicraft merchants
have also been safeguarded by the Government itself procuring their goods
and selling them at various exhibitions specially set up in the big cities
of India. The traders have also been provided all the facilities to extend
their marketing operations to many more cities like Lucknow, Hyderabad,
Ahmedabad, Bangalore etc. The handicrafts sector accounts for 5 percent
of the state's product.
In regard to horticulture, outflow of fruits
has also been having a boom except a minor set back in 1990 due to relatively
poor crop that year. The wholesale prices in the Delhi Mandi where bulk
of distribution is transacted, have been extremely favourable and the net
returns to the grower have actually been an improvement over the previous
years. The fruits from orchards belonging to Hindus have also been taken
over by the Muslims. Traditional trade channels have been kept open in
spite of many non-Kashmiri traders having been murdered by the terrorists.
The backbone of rural economy, which accounts for almost 80 percent of
the state's population, is agriculture, which means paddy cultivation.
Kashmir Valley has had the highest per hectare paddy yields in the country
since the mid 1960s until very recently when productivity levels in Punjab
forged ahead. Agriculture provides 40 percent of the state product. There
have been bumper paddy crops in 1990 and 1991. In 1992, there has been
slight reduction due to floods. All the brunt of whatever destruction and
disruption in the industrial sector has been borne by the Government. No
inconvenience has been allowed to be caused to the people. Only sufferers
have been 3 lakhs (300,000) Hindus, who had to run away leaving behind
even cooked food in the kitchen, which they could not take due to scare.
Many people as a matter of habit and conjecture, and presumption or under
the influence of excessive propaganda, go on pleading that the unemployment
among the educated youth is the reason for subversion. The unemployment
problem is, no doubt, very acute in the Jammu region and among the hilly
Gujjar population scattered in all the three regions. In the Kashmir Valley
almost all educated people are gainfully self- employed in their traditional
occupations. The Government job is sought for as a part-time venture, for
prestige, status and extra money. There is acute shortage of unskilled
and semi-skilled labour. The average standard of living and the general
quality of life in the Valley is far better than in any part of the country.
The official data has been prepared in such a way as to show that about
17 percent of population live below poverty line. The average for the whole
country is about 40 percent. The percentage of 17 is lowest in the country.
But this figure relates to the whole state and in actual reality applies
to Ladakh and Jammu regions. In the Kashmir Valley, none lives below the
poverty line. There is so much shortage of labour that men and women from
outside the state from far off areas as Bihar and Orissa have been brought
into the states regularly for construction of private houses and other
buildings. As a result, labour shortage, both skilled and unskilled, has
been greatly felt because of fall in the inflow of labour from outside
due to terrorism.
The J&K State Industrial Development
Corporation sanctioned loans for setting up 46 industrial units in Srinagar
during the year 1990 although it was a year of abnormal conditions. On
the other hand, in Jammu where there was perfect peace, loans for only
42 units were sanctioned by the same Corporation. Similarly, the Jammu
and Kashmir State Financial Corporation has continued to advance loans
although its recoveries of earlier loans have come to nil. In a public
notice, the J.K.S.F.C. nervously requested the borrowers to return their
dues so that other deserving people could get loans. This notice
was published in all Urdu dailies of Srinagar. There was no response. Instead
a demonstration was held in the office premises of the Corporation on 28th
August, 1991 by the concerned people against the Corporation's move to
recover earlier loans. Threats were also given against any impediments
in the matter of sanctioning new loans. The Corporation has regularly been
receiving applications for setting up industries and other purposes in
spite of the turmoil in the Valley. Very often, the Corporation officers
receive threats from the terrorists for not sanctioning loans to particular
individuals. To save their own lives, the officers approve the applications
without evaluating a project. At times even the necessary formalities are
not completed. Loans have been released without verifying if these were
actually used for the purpose they were taken. In fact, such is the situation
that no one dare ask a question if a militant showed interest in the case.
Loans were regularly advanced during the last three years. But there were
no recoveries.
The cry goes up from the Valley from the
usual quarters at convenient intervals that they are the poorest and most
unemployed and exploited and that they would be better of in Pakistan.
This is taken up in full-throated chorus by Indian media and intellectuals.
And the Central Government of the time - without exception - rushed with
bagfuls of money, with appropriate apologies and with folded hands to soothen
them till the next round arrives. It is totally wrong to hold that lack
of economic development might have created discontent in the Valley. The
fact is that accession and secession have been existing side by side so
far as Kashmir Valley has been having full autonomy with two colonies of
Ladakh and Jammu under its control. And this independence to do anything
the state government (which actually meant Muslims of Kashmir) wished without
being challenged from any quarter, has brought the Valley to the present
turmoil. In 1947 itself Sheikh Abdullah virtually demanded a separate Muslim
State which did not form a part of Secular India and which underlined the
recognition of the separate political identity of the Muslims in the state.
As later events proved, the Sheikh aimed at weaning away the state from
Pakistan and after that was achieved, pull it out of India and reconstitute
it into an independent Muslim State. When Sheikh and his Muslim Conference
had arisen against the Maharaja in 1931, he rallied the Muslims with anti-Hindu
and directly anti-Kashmiri Pandit slogans and sentiments. Launching virulent
attacks against Kashmiri Pandits in his public meeting preceded by resonant
recitations from the Holy Quran, the Sheikh exhorted his followers to rise
and fight the autocrat and reduce the exploiters, the Hindus to dust and
leave only scavenging for them to make a living. These stirring exhortations
woke up the silent simple folk and made them highly conscious politically
and articulate. At the same time, the seeds of disaffection were sown in
them against their fellow Kashmiris albeit of a different faith. When Maharaja
was forced to abdicate, in the absence of any alternative democratic set-up,
Abdullah considered himself to have become
Sultan. All he wanted
was to carve out a little Pakistan for himself at the expense of India.
He made a show of his firm belief in secularism but failed to put it in
practice. His approach to all problems was communal. While he had no objection
to receiving huge sums of money from the Centre as aid his belief in secularism
did not allow him to agree to the application to his Muslim majority state
of the secular democratic Constitution of India - not even the fundamental
rights guaranteed therein. And to ensure that no laws made by the Indian
Parliament applied to the State, a special status was obtained for Kashmir
under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution. But this does not prevent
the M.P.s from the state to fully participate in the discussions and voting
when laws are made for the rest of the country. They often give long sermons
on this and on that, keeping themselves and their state aloof.
The apologists for special status for Kashmir
exhibit their ignorance when they say that Kashmir's accession was not
like other States and the State was still governed by the Constitutional
Order of 1939 promulgated by Maharaja Hari Singh in that year. Surely,
they are not ignorant. They are using this as a camouflage to their desire
of carving out a third Islamic country in the sub- continent and at the
same time wanting India to continue to be secular which means - no-man's
land - to be claimed as a Muslim country subsequently. With the rate of
increase in Muslim population, unabated Muslim infiltration from all sides
particularly from the East, and what happened on Black Friday on 12th of
March, 1993, in Bombay, this possibility need not be laughed at. In the
last 45 years, Article 370 has proved to be the most delirious for the
country. Instead of achieving any healthy results that may be expected
of it, it has had the opposite effect of preventing Kashmir's integration
with the rest of the country. It has strengthened the sense of separate
identity among the Kashmiri Muslims, insulated them against mainstream
Indian influence, encouraged separatism and secessionism, fostered Islamic
fundamentalism, anti-national sentiments and pro-Pakistan loyalties, promoted
terrorism and created serious problems of national insecurity in the strategic
border state.
Article 370 was adopted by the Constituent
Assembly of India about two years after Kashmir's accession. It was a political
concession wrested by the wily Sheikh Abdullah. Abdullah had to opt for
India under the force of circumstances. His prime compulsion was Pakistan's
arrogant determination to take over the state by force and ignore all the
local political elements. He had serious reservations about Kashmir being
an integral part of India. As his own speeches and declassified documents
of the U.S. State Department reveal, he was working towards independent
Kashmir under his own domination. Like the Kashmir Constituent Assembly,
this Article was part of a Strategy to ward off temporary obstacles.
Like all other princes, the Kashmir ruler signed a proclamation in 1950
accepting Indian Constitution. There was a clear finality about this. At
present, Article 370 or autonomy is not the issue with the secessionists.
The issue is seccession from India - as an independent identity or as a
part of Pakistan. The follies committed by successive regimes in New Delhi
and their stooges in Srinagar in the name of democracy cannot be allowed
to continue for any more. Kashmir has to be integrated with India like
any other state. Article 370 was inspired by political theories and an
ideology that has been proved wrong by history. It has created another
divide based on residency in the state. Further, more politicians of the
ruling party made embrace of the Article to be axiomatic for a belief in
secularism. Anyone who has questioned the wisdom of retention of Article
370 is dubbed a communalist, an obscurantist or worse. The psychology related
to Article 370 has made Muslims feel that their state is not quite a part
of India. This feeling is one reason that they have not generally sought
jobs outside their state. The forces unleashed by these policies have led
to progressively greater alienation of the Muslims of the state. This is
the major cause why Pakistan's brew of intrigues has never suffered from
lack of fuel. Fundamentalists have seized on this disaffection and they
have targeted Hindus as being representative of unjust order. The uncertainty
must be ended once and for all. Article 370 must go. The rest of the Constitution
is fair enough to safeguard the rights of every Indian particularly Muslims
who have special safeguards as a minority community. Judiciary is independent
to uphold the Constitution. A special status smacks of lack of faith in
the secular democratic Constitution of India on the part of those who ask
for it as well as those who grant it. What more do the people of Kashmir
Valley want if not equality of treatment with all others in the country.
With the complete integration of the state with the rest of the country
and full application of the Indian Constitution, neither the communal majority
in India will be in a position to exploit or oppress the communal minority
anywhere including Kashmir, nor will the communal majority in the state
itself be able to oppress or exploit the communal minority within the state.
The accession had settled the position of
the state legally and emotionally too. But the Pakistan invasion has sundered
a part of it and put it under their occupation. Then a straightforward
reference to the United Nation for vacation of this aggression had given
the interests inimical to India the opportunity to transform it into a
complex and confusing proposition leaving the wound open and festering
without end. When the reality of political power came to the hands of the
Sheikh, he could not conceal his personal and dynastic ambition and dictatorial
behaviour. He used Bakshi Ghulam Muhammad against Afzal Beg and vice versa
and Sadiq against both. The romantic handsome, daredevil Muhuiddin Karra,
a powerful man of the organisation, left out of the glamour, power and
pelf of ministership, whose name alone would turn on youth, women and men
and who broke away from the National Conference and set up Political Conference
to propagate the case of Pakistan. The effect of it all was that opinion
was building up among some sections of population in the tiny Valley about
the advisability of the decision they had opted for. The Sheikh's hold
seemed to be slipping. To regain it, he went to the extreme step of turning
against India openly.
The Islamisation of the political and economic
organisation of Kashmir began as soon as power was formally handed over
to the Sheikh on 5th March, 1948. The exclusion of Jammu and Kashmir from
the purview of the Indian Constitution by virtue of Article 370 in 1949,
marked the formal acceptance of muslim identity of the Jammu and Kashmir
state. Sheikh Abdullah told Jawaharlal Nehru brazen facedly that Kashmir
was a Muslim majority state and, therefore, it could not be integrated
into the Union of India as that would bring the Muslims under the domination
of the Hindu majority of India. (Jammu and Ladakh had no place in Nehru's
thinking as unfortunate Hindus and Buddhists were in majority there.) The
immediate fall-out of this autonomy of the State under Article 370 was
that it deprived the people of Jammu and Kashmir state which included Ladakh
of all constitutional safeguards. Pandits were deprived of right to equality
before the law, exposing them to severe discrimination, communal persecution,
political oppression and economic deprivation. No wonder that from 1947
to 1989, more than three lakh of them were, slowly and steadily, squeezed
out from the state. Now from 1990 onwards, the remaining three lakh have
been banished as a result of genocide which has taken place in the cause
of establishment of
Nizam-e-Mustafa. Thus the Valley of Kashmir
has been cleared of all the Hindus and de facto Islamic set up established
although still within the broader framework of the Indian Constitution.
The problem of terrorism had grown steadily
from the time of accession through systemic propaganda and fundamentalisation
of Kashmiri Islam. From 1948 itself, Sheikh Abdullah had been talking of
independence for Kashmir in selected fora while advocating permanent relationship
with India on the surface. Article 370 had made the element of divisiveness
inherent in the set-up through misuse to ensure that rights of citizens
were denied to vast sections and portals of power were monopolised by a
small group. Kashmir terrorism is a pampered-oriented terrorism due to
Government trying to appease dissidents by acquiescing in anything wrong
or right they demanded. To bow before the bully was to invite the butcher
the next day. The attitude of the Indian decision makers had been determined
by the spirit of Munich. A vague hope has been entertained that
tomorrow would be all right.
Towards the last days of Pandit Jawaharlal
Nehru's life, personal relations between him and Sheikh Abdullah were re-established.
Nehru invited Abdullah to Delhi and latter came and stayed with Nehru for
several days. The sum-total of prolonged parleys between these two old
friends was that Abdullah would then onwards work for India-Pakistan amity.
The two were reported to be convinced that if this amity was achieved,
all pending problems between the two countries including that of Kashmir
could be solved by mutual goodwill. Abdullah arrived in Rawalpindi and
had prolonged discussions with Pakistan's President, General Ayub Khan.
Abdullah was alleged to have sought Pakistan President's support in the
form of arms and ammunition for Kashmiri youth to enable them to take Kashmir
away from India. After developing personal rapport with President Ayub
Khan, Abdullah was about to go on an extensive tour of Pakistan occupied
areas of Jammu and Kashmir. However, fate willed otherwise. Nehru suddenly
passed away. Abdullah was shocked and grieved. He returned to Delhi. In
the absence of nehru at the helm in India, he found his plans going awry.
Now he had to confront down to earth Indian leaders like the Prime Minister,
Lal Bahadur Shastri, Congress President K.Kamaraj, Home Minister Gulzari
Lal Nanda, Foreign Minister Sardar Swarn Singh and Defense Minister Y.B.Chavan.
For these leaders, personal friendship had no meaning in dealing with national
affairs.
He now desired to go to Mecca for Haj.
He was gladly allowed to do so. But instead of going straight to Mecca
for performing Haj, he left for England. He was accompanied by his wife,
Begam Akbar Jehan, Mirza Afzal Beg and Peer Abdul Ghani of Anantnag. Probably
it is for such people that the famous Urdu poet, Maulana Hali has said:
"Sidharein Peer Kaaba ko Ham Inglistaan
Jayengey,
Khuda Ka noor woh dekhein Ham Khuda ki shann dekhengey"
(Let the priests go to Kabba (Mecca), we will
go to England. Let them see the light of God, we will see the glory and
grandeur of God).
The Indian Government bore all his expenses and
those of his companions. But he repaid his debt there and then. He delivered
seditious speeches in the meetings which he addressed in London and other
places. He addressed meetings of Mirpuris called in Birmingham and other
cities in England. He praised Mirpuris for showing more life than Kashmiris.
From England he went to Paris and from there reached Mecca. After meeting
Saudi leaders he left for Egypt to meet President Nasser. He solicited
Nasser's support for Kashmir's freedom but drew blank. Later he left for
Algeria where, besides Algerian leaders he met Chau-En-Lai, the Prime Minister
of China. Chou assured him all support and announced it publicly.
Instead of building a relationship with
the masses, the successive Indian Governments focussed on personalities,
who were interested in personal power and fiefdom. The relationship has
been based on deception and duplicity. The state leaders, irrespective
of whatever party label they carried, were power brokers and practised
opportunistic secularism. Whenever they faced even a slight threat to their
power, they raised the cry of Kashmiri identity. The secularism practised
by the state leadership was phoney and it had always vacillated between
secularism and communalism to suit the occasion in its reckless search
for power. Democracy in the state was always only in form but not in substance.
The leaders never failed to exploit the religious obscruntism always with
an anti-India strain during elections. Sheikh Abdullah seldom hesitated
to use Islam as part of his power game. When the Indian National Congress
extended its organisation to Jammu and Kashmir and established a separate
Pradesh Congress Committee in 1966, Sheikh Abdullah issued a
Fatwa
(religious decree) from Hazratbal Shrine labelling Congress Party as an
organisation of infidels. He declared that it would be a sin to offer
namaaz-e-janaza
(funeral prayers) for Muslims who were members of the Congress Party. He
also launched a movement named Tarak-i-Mawalaat (boycott of Congress
Muslims). As a rival strategy, Congress leaders in the state propped up
Jamaat-i-Islami.
It has been misfortune of this country that
whenever one correct step was taken, it was subsequently followed by steps
which were all wrong. In 1953, people of the state had hoped that the political
uncertainty was over and that they could settle down to live a peaceful
life. But that was not to be. The inevitability of the return of Sheikh
Abdullah was kept alive by the Indian authorities, which hung as the sword
of Democles over each succeeding Government. One cannot help lamenting
that there is not even one step in this long and tortuous and unending
journey that our Government might have taken with a clear vision and thoughtfully
on Kashmir. If ever a step was taken with a clear vision, it was backtracked.
Seeds of discord were sown in during Abdullah's initial stewardship. After
getting the Maharaj removed, the Sheikh showed his inner urges and claws
and fell out with the erstwhile saviors. He found it below his dignity
to talk to Jawaharlal Nehru even on telephone. No doubt he lost his throne
in 1953 but he had succeeded in sowing the thorns of discord with India
in simple and malleable minds of the Muslims of the Valley. His lieutenants
who succeeded him were taken up by the driving desire but formidable task
of holding on to power. They were left with little choice other than purchasing
peace on the surface by constant and increasing doses of appeasement, which
flowed in from the Centre at an extravagant scale. The more the people
were sought to be appeased and pampered the more they were emboldened to
ask for the moon. Rampant corruption was a necessary concomitant, which
inevitably created pockets of scandalous riches on one side and burning
anger of discrimination against large section on the other. Bakshi Ghulam
Mohammed did try and succeeded to a great extent in making some developmental
advances in the state but the sword of religious fanaticism was always
kept dangling over his head by his ambitious opponents, who outwardly called
themselves leftists. Sadiq tried and succeeded to a great extent
in consolidating the gains of economic emancipation achieved by the people
of the state during the Bakshi regime. He tried his best to uphold the
rule of the law and wanted to do away with Article 370. But as a man dependent
on pills and potions, he could not face the strain created by his young
colleagues, who proved to be conspiratorial and with only skin-deep faith
in democracy and secularism. After Sadiq's death, Mir Qasim became the
Chief Minister. He appeared to be travelling but not arriving. His regime
was free for all sorts of people. It is said that in germany everything
was prohibited unless permitted by law. In Italy, everything was permitted
particularly that which was prohibited by the law and in erstwhile USSR,
everything was prohibited that which was permitted by law. In Qasim's Kashmir,
the scenario of the group of European countries mentioned above was operative
in its entirety, i.e. everything was permitted from smuggling, cultivation
of charas, fundamentalist intrusion and above all silent squeezing of minorities.
Everybody, who was somebody, usurped government land to turn into a big
orchardist. Forests were destroyed by countless lessees who mushroomed
on the political horizon. Mir Qasim ultimately handed over the Riyasat
to Sheikh Abdullah, according to him, its rightful owner and himself shifted
to Central arena for fresh greenery and safer pastures. He became a Cabinet
Minister in Indira Gandhi's Government and adopted the wiser way of digesting
what he had acquired in two decades of his activities in the turbulent
valley, In those days, uncharitable remarks about the quality and cost
of material used in the foundation of his house in Srinagar was the talk
of town. The
Riyasat handed over to Sheikh Abdullah was, in turn,
made over by the latter to his son, Farooq Abdullah. His son-in-law, G.M.Shah
snatched away the same from his brother-in-law for a short span by intrigue.
The son retook it with the help of Delhi durbar and faithfully paved the
way for terrorist take-over. Terrorists are now planning to hand over the
valley to Pakistan and declare themselves as an independent new Pakistan.
Poor Kasmiris are wondering that their state had acceded to India in 1947
and for what sins are they being kicked like a football for the last 45
years. For what fault of theirs has India forsaken them and thrown them
to vultures.
Having engaged in a war with Pakistan over
Kashmir, Indian leadership worked with a remarkable stupidity. Our leadership
foolishly internationalised the issue and allowed it to get mixed up with
the exigencies of cold war. When the Indian Army recaptured Baramulla on
7th November, 1947 and Muzaffarabad and Mirpur were within its grasp, the
Indian leadership entered into a cease-fire agreement under the influence
of a British Governor general, creating a stalemate which has dogged us
eversince. After 17 years we fought another war with Pakistan. It produced
the Tashkent declaration. Both countries solemnly agreed not to change
the status-quo except by mutual consent. In law and in fact, it meant that
unless the parties by mutual consent and with affectionate understanding,
voluntarily agreed to make changes, the existing position will remain binding
on them. The next conflict was not over Kashmir but over Bangladesh. At
the end of that war in 1971, Pakistan was a shattered nation, physically,
emotionally and economically. Ideologically, its moral basis had crumbled
and its confidence was brutally shaken. If ever India had control over
the situation it was in 1972. Such opportunities never recur nor do they
last long. India was in a position to impose a final solution. On July
3, 1972, a bilateral agreement between India and Pakistan was signed. The
Shimla agreement appeared to have been dictated by vanquished Pakistan's
conquered Bhutto to India's victorious Indira Gandhi. He got back 93,000
troops who were prisoners of war in India and some lost territory plus
the area which it had wrested in Chhamb against just a promise on paper
that Kashmir issue too would be settled bilaterally. Shimla agreement turned
out to be only a ruse to get out of the Indian net, which could have been
an iron grip in the hands of a more resolute nation.
Sheikh Abdullah, after a decade of self-exile
and fruitless wanderings was brought back to power in Kashmir. This was
done by Indira Gandhi, who had panicked after realising that crafty Zulfikar
Ali Bhutto and his more intelligent daughter, Benazir had outwitted her
in Shimla. Internally, it was a tumultuous time in India's history. In
mid-seventies people were distraught by painful political uncertainties
and leadership was engaged in sharp mutual confrontations. On his part,
the Sheikh settled down to secure his Riyasat and his
Quom
for his dynastic rule. Inevitably, his son and wife on one side and his
daughter and son-in-law on the other, started their schemes for capturing
the throne in right Mughal style. When the Sheikh passed away, the struggle
intensified even while Farooq had taken over Chief Ministership. Gul Shah
was waiting in the wings and smarting. Both had created their resources
of men and material and had armed their respective bands of goons to give
battle to the other. In his last span of reign, the Lion of Kashmir
had succumbed to the temptation of allowing his wife Madar-e-Meharban (it
was common talk that the Begum actually sat and counted the notes to ensure
that the bribe was what it was purported to be) to accept capitation fee
for entrance into professional colleges.
When the Sheikh returned to his throne,
he set about to insulate his
Riyasat and Quom against imperialist
India with determination but little noise.After him his son and son-in-law
fended all the time and made good fertile ground for the secessionists
and Islamic fundamentalists to thrive, who now hold the valley under their
heel. Sheikh had by now thrown away all his life long colleagues like dead
rats. He was now keen to push out the only leader who was still around
- Afzal Beg. Sheikh considered him a thorn in his dynastic aims. Beg, a
sickman struck with many chronic diseases, had earlier canvassed for his
son-in-law Yakub Beg, for being elected to the Legislative Council. Yakub
Beg had also been a political leader of some standing in Anantnag district.
Sheikh considered this move as a parallel dynastic maneuver. Afzal Beg,
who was next only to Sheikh in the Government and the party, had perhaps
for the first time visited Delhi alone and in his own initiative. In connection
with official matters, he met Mr.Morarji Desai then Prime Minister of India.
On his return to Srinagar he found Sheikh furious. In a sudden and dramatic
move, Sheikh dismissed Afzal Beg from the Cabinet, expelled him from the
primary membership of the party and launched a tirade against him of being
an Indian agent. Beg was intelligent but crafty and had been pro-secessionist
and communal from day one. He had good following in some parts of the valley
particularly in Anantnag district. On witnessing unprecedented humiliation
of their leader (for which also they blamed India), his followers joined
various secessionist organisations like Peoples' League, Mahaz-e-Azadi
etc. Beg's son, Mahboob Beg later joined hands with Gul Shah to take revenge
from Farooq. No wonder that secessionist activities, which till then were
confined to northern border areas of the valley, appeared with full fury
in the southern areas more pronouncedly in Anantnag town. Earlier, Sheikh's
another life-long colleague, Sufi Mohammad Akbar, on being marginalised
by the Sheikh, had under sheer disillusionment, founded a new secessionist
organisation named Mahaz-i-Azadi with its headquarters at Sopore. Another
leader who became frustrated on account of India's surrender to Sheikh's
personal dictatorship was Abdul Ghani Lone. He was a Congressman and a
senior Cabinet Minister in the Congress ministry headed by Mir Qasim. As
a minister, he had many good measures to his credit particularly in the
field of education. He termed India's surrender to Sheikh as humiliation
of the people. So, from a staunch Congressman he became a secessionist
and founded pro-Pak People's Conference. When Afzal Beg was lying seriously
ill in S.M.H.S. Hospital, Srinagar, Sheikh Abdullah as Chief Minister,
visited the hospital to enquire about his health. Putting his right hand
on his forehead, he enquired from Beg whether he could recognise him. Beg
looked up and concentrating his eyes on Sheikh, replied in a feeble voice
that if he could not recognise him with his close association for fifty
years, how could he do so in the last moments of his life.
In Sheikh's government corruption knew no
bounds. His son-in-law Ghulam Mohammad Shah (Gul Shah) was a law unto himself.
He had formed an army of toughs, whose job was to roam about in the city
and shout: Gul Shah -- Baadshah. What India practised in Kashmir
from 1947 was not real politik. Far from that, a new philosophy was evolved
and the modus operandi of its implementation was to buy people by giving
them absolute liberty to be corrupt, and thus suffuse them with money.
it was a new version of a pack with Mephistophles at a national level.
As should have been anticipated, the experiment - a politico-sociological
one was bound to fail and come home to roost. In a bid to pamper the valley,
Jammu and Ladakh have been ignored in the matter of development, employment
and educational opportunities. The successive Kashmir-dominated governments
have treated these regions with contempt. The recommendations of the Gajendragadkar
Commission, which looked into the grievances of the Jammu people, are gathering
dust like the one about setting up of regional boards. Even the mercy of
providing an Engineering College for Jammu had not been shown to the people
of the region. Another Commission was appointed to recommend creation of
more districts in Jammu region. The Commission recommended creation of
three more districts. But this recommendation has also been kept aside
to gather dust. No wonder, three new districts Kupwara, Pulwama, Badgam
were instantly created in the Kashmir Valley. Also Shopian was constituted
into a sub-district. Two more new districts were also on the anvil in the
valley, one consisting the areas of Sonawari and Bandipore and the other
at Kulgam. This was personally announced by Farooq Abdullah in August 1989.
In the air-bus coalition ministry of Congress
and National Conference headed by Dr.Farooq Abdullah, there was not a single
Minister from ladakh. How can Buddhists be denied the right to preserve
their ethnic identity which they regarded as important as the Kashmiriat
in the valley? People of Ladakh have given no mandate to Kashmiris to speak
for Ladakh. But the Government of India continues to give veto powers to
Kashmiri leaders in regard to fate of Ladakh. After persistent agitation
and prolonged discussions, an agreement had been reached for setting up
of Hill Council for Ladakh region. A meeting between the Union Home Minister
and Ladakhi leaders was fixed for 3 p.m. on 9th April, 1992 at New Delhi.
All issues having been agreed and settled, the only agenda for the meeting
was announcement of the formula of a Hill Council. Mr. Saif-u-Din Soz,
former M.P. and prominent spokesman of Farooq Abdullah, utilised his veto
and stalled the proposal of a Hill Council. The meeting was cancelled at
the eleventh and half hour. Later, Soz said "...The point of time was
important. The decisive meeting to announce the formation of a Hill Council
for Ladakh was fixed for 3 p.m. on 9th April, 1992. By noon that day, I
had apprised the Governor of my point of view and demanded that the Home
Minister should be told plainly that he would be inviting trouble if Hill
Council for Ladakh were announced. I had also told the Governor that he
represented the President of India but certainly not the people of Jammu
and Kashmir. Later on that day I had sent a note to the Home Minister as
also the Prime Minister. On 10th April, 1992, I was invited by the Home
Minister to discuss the matter with him. The Governor of the state was
also present. I made a decisive statement in the meeting that the question
of providing a Hill Council to Ladakh was not only ill-advised but also
ill-timed. In the meantime, I had also charged that the Ladakh Buddhist
Association was working with the support and directions from B.J.P. and,
therefore, the Central Government will be well- advised to ponder over
the likely political fall-out of the move". By using his veto power,
Mr.Soz has also plainly warned the Government and the people of India that
the President of India does not represent Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.
That right is tied to a pole in Mujahid Manzil, which is now under the
control of terrorists. In 145, the British Government asked its Governor-
General and Viceroy of India to solve the imbroglio. Wavell called a conference
at Shimla and also held personal discussions with top leaders of all major
political parties. After meeting the Viceroy, when Jinnah came out of the
meeting, he told waiting press men that now general elections may soon
be held in the country. It was apparent that Wavell had confided in Jinnah
in a way and asked him to be ready for the polls. He did not give any such
directions to the Congress leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru, Maulana Azad,
Sardar Patel and others who had met him earlier. This made Gandhiji to
exclaim in exasperation: "Who rules India? Wavell or Jinnah? The
same question is relevant now. Who runs the Government of India? Rao or Soz?
As narrated earlier, much of the most part
of the enormous plan, loan and other assistance funds flow to the valley.
And because much of these funds have always gone into the pockets of a
relatively small but influential persons or politically aggressive factions
and black-mailing elements, the overall development of the state as a whole
and Jammu and Ladakh markedly so, has progressed at a low rate relative
to the immeasurable outlays provided by the Centre. Many other benefits
get channelled into the valley, which are not so visible - concessions
and subsidies in Kashmiri handicraft. Nelson's eye is turned on narcotics
production and trafficking, complete tax evasion to name but a few. The
tragedy of Kashmir is how closely it mirrors the Iranian situation towards
the end of the seventies, where the ruling elite either belonging to Congress
or National Conference was compared to Pahelvis and India to the great
Satan, America. India invested all the trust in Qasim's, Muftis, Farooqs,
Kars and Sozs and their coteries of power-hungry associates, (about five
thousand families), who usurped all the judicial and constitutional process
in the state for their personal financial gain, alienated the masses and
provided a breeding ground for the Islamic fundamentalists. Paradoxically,
it is the younger generation of these families, who are in the vanguard
of terrorism, to escape the wrath of the masses and pass of the same to
India and Hindus. Without the remotest hint of accountability, autonomy
became an instrument of expediency at the hands of the unsrupulous politicians
to promote coterie rule so much so that 80 percent of the total assets
in the state were controlled by a tiny group comprising 15 to 20 percent
of the population. The cumulative effect of this distortion was widespread
popular alienation-rigging merely aggravated the phenomenon of the people
with the power structure. Under the circumstances, it was only natural
that popular discontent assumed strong anti-India overtones, more so since
the ruling party was identified as extension of Indian dominance. Article
370 compounded the problem.
A basically correct and upright policy was
never adopted. In order to sustain this expedient approach, one evil led
to another. When corrupting people didn't meet the ephemeral ends, elections
were sought to be rigged. The nomination papers of non-Congress candidates
in all the fifteen Assembly constituencies of Anantnag district (which
included Pulwana district also) in 1967, were rejected with one flourish
of the D.C.'s pen. Thus, all the Congress candidates which included the
PCC Chief, Syed Mir Qasim, Mufti Mohammad Sayeed among others, were declared
elected unopposed to the Assembly. Also elected unopposed was the Congress
candidate for the Lok Sabha from the Anantnag constituency, Mohammad Shafi
Qureshi. It was a common talk that M.L.A.s during that election had been
made by Khaliq (the name of the D.C.) and not by maalik, the voter. Never
have the progressives, communists, scholars at JNU or fellows of
the Nehru Museum and Library,
intellectuals and eminent journalists,
week after week, projecting the cause of those demanding autonomy, uttered
or written a word about this autonomy by Kashmir for all these decades.
In fact, these distinguished men and women had been rushing to the beautiful
valley to enjoy themselves fully the hospitality of the Government of the
time during the summer months. As if to repay the debt, despatches used
to be sent from there and articles consisting of two or three series written
on return, lavishing unprecedented praise on the Government whether of
Sheikh, Bakshi, Sadiq, Qasim or Farooq. Now that the king has fallen, they
talk of rigging the elections. One has only to go through the files of
newspapers to be amused.
In March, 1987, in Dr.Farooq Abdullah's
constituency of Ganderbal, counting of votes started at 9 a.m. By 9.30
a.m. he was reported to be leading by a decisive margin and by noon it
was announced that he had been elected by a margin of about 25,000 votes.
He was flooded with telegrams congratulating him on his splendid and well
deserved victory. At night, on a special live programme on Doordarshan,
he was interviewed by a distinguished journalist, who congratulated him
and hoped he would lead the state to progress and prosperity. Farooq had
got 95 percent of votes polled. A wag had commented on this, Farooq would
have got 100 percent votes but it appeared that communal forces in India
had encroached upon the state's autonomy and special status and thus caused
loss of five percent votes for Farooq. Election over, it was all hip hip
hurray. The eminent persons, who are never tired of speaking in seminars
and symposia, lament that "we have failed to give justice and democracy
to Kashmiris". They have no moral courage to explain who are we
and who are
them. Who is standing in the way of applying in full
the Indian Constitution, which is democratic, to the state of J&K.
After all, it was under the auspices of Indian Constitution that the election
of mighty Indira gandhi was set aside in 1975. It was the Indian Constitution
under whose auspices, Mr.V.M.Tarkunde, Rajni Kothari and other distinguished
persons succeeded in ordering repoll in the constituency of late Rajiv
Gandhi. It was under the auspices of Indian Constitution that a handful
of people succeeded in getting the election in Meham cancelled and depriving
Mr. Om Prakash Chautala of his Chief Ministership. Have these progressives
courage to admit that Kashmiris can never get democracy so long as Indian
Constitution does not apply to the state in full. Hoodlums, masquerading
as political leaders, under the protection of Article 370, will always
ensure that they thrived at the cost of common man. This Article has created
a strange phenomenon in Kashmir. So long as one is in power, he is with
India. The moment he loses power, he is for Pakistan or independence.
After all, why do terrorists whom we respectfully
call militants, want Azadi? And who. our progressive assure us,
may settle for autonomy, if India shows the towel. They want to have a
religious state in Kashmir - to be guided by principles, tenets and traditions
of Islam. Inequalities between Muslims and non-Muslims are inevitable in
such a state. A religious state can be created and maintained through absolute
power in the hands of a chosen few blessed by God. The masses must follow
them and obey their commands. The idea of liberty, equality and fraternity
is an anti-thesis of religious state. Democracy and theocracy cannot go
together. In a religious state their can be neither democracy nor justice.
Minorities, if allowed to live, are doomed to live as second class citizens.
An eminent journalist, who has a weekly column in a national daily, has,
while ridiculing the blinkered Kashmir experts suggested:
"Autonomy
should no longer be considered a dirty word since nearly every state is
clamouring for it in varying degrees. Kashmir could become the beginning
of some genuine decentralisation". It amounts to saying that Kashmir
will act as a model for other states to have their own Nizam-e-Mustafa.
This distinguished journalist has also referred to some three realities
and has also demanded that India work for getting trust of Kashmiris. With
her successful discovery of realities, her non-blinkered eyes have not
been able to see the staring reality of three lakh natives having been
uprooted from their abodes and forced to bite dust in hostile terrains.
For her it appears to be a small accident of a cart hitting a plant, at
a sub-urban wayside, requiring not even filing of an F.I.R. at some police
post. To her, there is no need for Kashmiri Muslims to get the trust of
this minority community. How can Hindus have any rights? They are a consumable
commodity. The pseudo-secular scribes have not so far realised that the
re-writing of history by fundamentalists in the Kashmir valley has produced
heaps of horrors. But the degeneration of Kashmir valley from modernism
to medieval fundamentalism is given respectability. They want the Government
and the country to crawl before the group of terrorists who call themselves JKLF, because the group does not want to join Pakistan but wants Jammu
and Kashmir to be an independent state, as if demanding independence is
an act of high patriotism. (It is an after-point if Pakistan will allow
them to remain independent once they separate from India.) A free Kashmir
will be like an earthen pipkin which will be shattered by Pakistan in no
time. Joint guarantee has no meaning. It presupposes functional co-operation
between India and Pakistan, which is not possible.
JKLF is as fundamentalist as
Hizb-ul-Mujahidden.
In our country it has not been fully realised that so far whipping of religious
frenzy is concerned, there is little difference between JKLF and other
groups. In an interview to
Sadai-e-Hurriat one of the three mouthpieces
of the subversive organisation, on February 9, 1990, Hilal Beg, the then
Chief of J&K Students Liberation Front, dispelled the impression that
JKLF was secular. He quoted Aman Ullah Khan's statement in which he said:
"Islam
is our soul, our faith, we do not believe in any other ideology. We are
dedicated to the cause of Islamic Republic". The maximum number of
Hindus in Kashmir were killed by the members of the JKLF. We must bow to
the knowledgeability of the secularists of our country. In Kashmir,
terrorists have decreed that all women young and old should cover their
bodies from head to toe. Violators are subjected to acid thrown on their
faces. In this manner no woman can work in farms and fields, factories
and offices, for that matter anywhere. They must hide each and every limb
so that men could keep their sexual lust under check. All liquor retail
outlets have been ordered to be closed. Because if they are open, people
will go and buy it. This shows how their determination and belief in their
religious tenets is shallow. It only shows that if it is available, no
tenet will stand in the way of people to go in for it. But if it is not
available abstaining is compulsory. However aqua vita is smuggled into
the valley in drums from Jammu and other places. Perhaps the terrorists
also need the fluid to acquire Dutch courage.
Politically the Kashmir valley Muslims have
been the most dominant in the state. They hold the largest number of seats
in the legislature and the Cabinet and all the Chief Ministers have hailed
from this section of the people of the state. Similarly, they occupy the
most important and influential position in the state administration and
its different limbs. A large number of Kashmiri Muslims prospered immensely
in the four decades. By being pampered all the time they became bereft
of sense of responsibility a citizen owes to his state. Greed stifled their
development. All the Kashmiri Muslims, A majority of about 95 percent were
declared to be economically backward. A system of quotas in schools, colleges
and jobs were instituted. These quotas not only applied at the entrance
level of Government departments but also for promotion to higher ranks.
Soon this system was further perverted so that candidates from Muslim community
were not chosen according to merit either. The bureaucratic system that
emerged in Kashmir must have been one of the most corrupt in India and
the whole world. It must be realised that Muslims in Kashmir as elsewhere
in the sub-continent are socially divided in castes that have traditionally
worked in different occupations. Since performance and skill were not determinants
for hiring, the urban Muslim elites, who were from few selected castes,
were able to carve out a lion's share in Government openings. The nature
of the quota system makes it out as an entitlement, so there has been a
great deal of resentment in the weaker Muslim castes about this matter.
Seeing the richness extra-ordinary, the
rest of the average rich sections became envious. Charas cultivation mushroomed.
Narcotic trade started vibrating with the veins of the youth, who dreamed
of becoming millionaires overnight. The golden crescent offered smuggling
opportunities on unprecedented scale involving both young and old. This
polluted the basic fabric of working lifestyle of masses. When this trade
was subjected to surveillance, the youth demanded secession. This greed
of easy money brought the youth in contact with international underworld.
All the governments, irrespective of their label, gave free hand to the
rich to become richer. Article 370 had already protected the rich sections
from paying any taxes, wealth tax, gift tax etc. There was hardly any assessee
for income- tax. The state was also not covered by the Urban Land Ceiling
Act. As regards land reforms, there was no scope for improvement at all.
The Land Reforms Act, 1950 and then of 1971 had made Kashmir an unique
model in the entire world. This created new landed aristocracy in the villages.
Sheikh Abdullah had given the slogan of
Izzat and Abroo - honour and dignity under the canopy of Article
370. So, there was not only freedom but license to the economic offenders.
The only condition was to make offerings to the Begum for Tanzeem
and to Sheikh himself for Auqaf. Whatever
Nazool or any government
or public land was available in rural areas, it was usurped by bigwigs
for creating their private orchards. All such lands in the towns and the
city was taken over by the Auqaf. It was a common sight to find
a signboard coming up suddenly on any vacant land claiming to be belonging
to
Auqaf. Sometimes claim was even advanced to the land belonging
to a Hindu shrine. The ancient Ashram of Gautam Rishi at Gautamnag was
suddenly claimed to be a Muslim graveyard a few years back. Dispute was
still sub-judice when Hindus themselves were driven out en mass. In Srinagar
city, a plot of land near Ram Bagh owned by Government of India, Department
of Telecom, and earmarked for much needed staff quarters, was one Friday
declared to be Idgah. In fact
Aukaf has been running a parallel
revenue department. Huge chunks of land were given to fundamentalists for
Idgahs and construction of Islamic institutions. In Anantnag town, reserved
land near Forest Office, was acquired by government for General Bus Stand
and later on handed over to Muslims for Idgah. Yet another plot at Ashajipora
was given for another Idgah. The two Idgah's are hardly two kilometres
away from each other. A third piece of land including hundreds of trees
was given to Iqbal Memorial Institute run by Jamait Islamia. Such cases
are in hundreds all over the state. All
kahcharai land,
shamilat
land and land belonging to State Government was entered in revenue records
as belonging to Islam. To be correct, it was called Maqbooza Ahl-e-
Islam.
Highlights of the new order had become clear
from 1981-82. A number of World Islamic Conferences were held in Kashmir,
one of them attended by delegates from several Islamic countries including
Imam of Mecca. Spearheading the campaign for Pakistan, the Jammat-e-Islami
skillfully utilised the presence of religious leaders from Islamic countries
to raise their prestige and thus emerge as a potential pro-Pak force in
the valley. In Maktabs and Darasgahs, budding Muslim boys were taught that
according to Muslim law the world is divided into two camps. Darul-Islam
and Darul-Harb. A country is Darul-Islam when it is ruled by Muslims. A
country is Darul-Harb (abode of war) when Muslims only reside in it but
are not its rulers. Fundamentalists from Iran and Pakistan mushroomed in
the valley in an organised way and started addressing prayer gatherings
in mosques. In place of world brotherhood or human brotherhood, stress
was laid on Islamic brotherhood (Muslim Ummah). As part of their campaign,
Jamaat cadres ransacked libraries in educational institutions and ordered
to ban books, which did not correspond with their brand of knowledge about
man and his world. In Kashmir University, the, library was pruned and more
than two thousand books of knowledge series,
Milton's Paradise Lost
and George Bernard Shaw's plays and books by many other world-renowned
writers were thrown out. As part of Islamisation campaign, the Jammat men
also forcibly converted Kashmir University's campaign hall into a mosque.
Similar things happened in the prestigious Institute of Medical Sciences
near Srinagar. In the Medical Colleges and Teachers Training Colleges in
the valley, where Jamaat active teachers forced closure of classes whenever
Darwin's Theory of Evolution was taught to students, on the plea that it
did not conform to the Islamic tenets. The majority Muslim community, though
ethnically no different from their Hindu brethren, now began to look upon
the Hindu as an un-Islamic creature.
In 1980, income-tax authorities from Delhi
carried out raids on some business establishments. When the team consisting
of seventy I.T. officials was about to start its work in Srinagar, officials
were physically assaulted. Dr.Farooq Abdullah, who was them member of the
Lok Sabha, went round and gathered a furious mob inciting them with the
plea that Kashmir's honour was at stake, he asked them to attack the officers.
Forty-seven officers who included some lady officers were injured. The
documents were snatched from them and destroyed. Officers who were threatened
to be drowned in the nearby Dal Lake, ran helter skelter to save their
lives. They could not go to any hotel for food and had to return to Delhi
immediately. Next day, Sheikh Abdullah made a seditious speech at Iqbal
Park, warning Hindustan that if it does not behave properly, Kashmir will
be compelled to reconsider the issue of accession. No wonder, India has
been behaving properly since then. What was the reaction of the
people? Reflecting this, chairman of the Peoples League, Mohammad Farooq
Rehmani wrote: "While the general public had become very happy about
the income-tax raids to detect hidden income, Sheikh Abdullah felt extremely
annoyed and expressed his resentment. There was no doubt that Sheikh Abdullah
had become a protector of capitalists and racketeers, who made unmerited
gains through dishonest means and honest practices and laws were meant
only for the uninfluential poor people. Sheikh Abdullah and family considered
himself above law."
During the Congress government headed by
Mir Qasim as Chief Minister, there appeared to be a tacit understanding
between some Congress leaders and leaders of Jamaat-i-Islami. But with
the ascendancy of Sheikh to power in 1975, Jamaat- i-Islami changed its
tactics. Instead of facing the Sheikh directly, their cadres joined the
National Conference ranks but continued to operate their own plans at religious
and educational level. In course of time, the state administration was
swarmed by Jamaat-I-Islami activists. The Central Government remained blind
on every occasion. The fundamentalists in Iran had taken their country
in iron grip. They began to export the Islamic fundamentalism. Iran opened
its purse strings to spread its mission and filled the coffers of many
including those who wanted scores with India. From another side came God-sent
lethal weapons, arms and ammunition that were passed to Pakistan by USA
purportedly for use by the Afghan rebels operating from there. Thus, our
inveterate adversary -Pakistan had everything and more at its command without
having to dip into its own pockets to create a troublesome area from Kashmir
down to Punjab. To keep Pakistan on the right side, some Arab countries
flush with petro-dollars poured untold funds into Islamic Pakistan headed
by Gen.Zia, the suave schemer, religious zealot and relentless tormentor
of what was dubbed as the land of infidels.
Inside, a small elite of real estate agents,
politicians, bureaucrats, businessmen have been controlling the economy
in Kashmir and they diverted the anger of middle and lower class Kashmiri
Muslims against them towards the Central Government. Thus, grave damage
was done by subversive organisations. No action was taken to root them
out when after the Bangladesh war they stood thoroughly demoralised. Instead
Sheikh Abdullah had been brought back by way of Indira-Abdullah accord,
which also be called Beg-Parthasarthi accord (1975) and given a free hand
to take Kashmir away from India. Accord madness was repeated when under
Rajiv-Farooq accord. Farooq Abdullah was brought back to power. Despite
clear warnings from the Governor, internal subversion was allowed to grow
unchecked. Consequently, by the end of 1989, almost all the components
of power structure passed into the hands of subversives.
Rajiv Gandhi nullified the Supreme Court's
judgement in the Shah Bano case in early 1986. The sordid deal between
the Government and the dyed-in-the-wool Muslim communalists and bigots
dealt a lethal blow to secularism. In Kashmir, it created immediate results.
There was jubilation at the spectacular victory of Islam. The speech delivered
by the senior Cabinet Minister of Rajiv Gandhi Government, Z.R.Ansari in
the Lok Sabha, in which while defending the new Act, he castigated and
ridiculed the Supreme Court of India and its judges, was reproduced in
the local newspapers of Srinagar. The hawkers who sold these newspapers
loudly shouted: "La-deen Hindustan per Islam ka tamacha" etc. Arif
Mohammad Khan, a Minister of State in the Rajiv gandhi Government, who
had supported the Supreme Court judgement and opposed the new bill, was
a special target. The morale of G.M.Shah, who was ruling the state with
Congress(I) support, was upbeat. On his return from Haj, Rajiv Gandhi had
invited him to dinner at New Delhi. On this occasion, he had assured Shah
of continued Congress support in the Assembly. He felt bold politically
to yield to the communal demands of Jamaat-i-Islami one by one. Interested
elements in bureaucracy and politics spread some false rumours and canards
in the Kashmir valley around third week of February, 1986 about some imaginary
happenings in Jammu City, which had never actually happened. Violent processions
were taken out and communal rioting was spread in full fury in Anantnag
district. G.M.Shah and many Congress leaders were in the valley. They made
no attempt to stop the fury. Hysterical Muslim mobs attacked Hindus in
Anantnag town and large number of villages in the district. Their houses
and shops were looted and burnt. Temples were demolished, damaged and desecrated.
Idols and portraits of Hindu deities inside the temples were urinated upon
and then thrown into nearby brooks and nallahs. The places involved were
Anantnag, Bijbehara, Danow Bogund, Akoora, Wanpoh, Look Bhawan, Chowgam
etc. In Bijbehara, four ancient and most revered temples were desecrated.
These were Vijeshwar temple and the temple dedicated to Lord Shiva
on the Harishchandra Ghat of river Vitasta. This latter temple had been
beautifully built with well-laid out area around it appropriate for meditation
and contemplation. This temple with its two most modern ghats is the substitute
for Varanasi in Kashmir. It always used to be thronged by sadhus and pilgrims
from Nepal, Bengal, Kerala, Karnataka and other far off places in the country.
In the village of Danow Bogand, unprecedented misery was inflicted on the
Hindus, who were prosperous, educated and highly professional and always
out to serve the Muslim masses with love and affection both local and living
in surrounding villages. Butthe Muslims overpowered by Islamic frenzy pounced
upon their benefactors and threw them to the dust. Altogether, 32 places
were affected. In these 24 temples were burnt, 22 were desecrated and looted
and large number of idols were broken. The destruction and damage to houses,
shops etc. was colossal. Mufti Mohammad Sayeed, the PCC President was away
in Delhi. He returned after two days and completed the formality of going
around the affected villages. The
kept press treated the tragedy
as trivial in the interests of secularism and maintaining peace
in the rest of the country. The Kashmiri Samiti, Delhi organised massive
relief. Its teams toured the villages extensively and provided much needed
material relief to all the families. The BJP leaders, Shri L.K.Advani and
Kidar Nath Sahni visited the affected villages and met and consoled each
and every victim.
This vandalism was just a rehearsal for
what happened from January, 1990 onwards. As a result of serious communal
riots, Congress Party withdrew support to G.M.Shah government who resigned
and Governor's rule was imposed. Hindu minority felt dazed. Unbelievable
had happened. Immediately afterwards Kashmiri Hindu leaders knocked at
the doors of authorities in Delhi. A high-level delegation of Kashmiri
Pandit leaders met the Prime Minister, Rajiv Gandhi. He advised them not
to migrate and solemnly assured the Kashmiri Pandits that their safety,
honour and dignity would be ensured at all costs with all the might of
India. But when the Hindus of Kashmir became refugees and lost everything,
Rajiv turned his eyes from them. He donated, on behalf of AICC, Rs.10 lakhs
for the flood victims of Bangladesh but did not offer a single rupee as
relief to the Pandits from Kashmir, who had fallen from riches to rags.
He did not even express lip sympathy for them, although they had become
victims of his credulity and negligence. When he was in personal and political
distress from April, 1987 onwards, due to Bofors scandal, he addressed
a party rally at Boat Club, New Delhi. With an eye for cheap applause from
his audience, he warned Pakistan and said:
ham Pakistan ki naani
yaad karayengey. While Rajiv said this only as a rhetoric, Pakistan
actually made Kashmiri Pandits (with whom Rajiv had maternal links) to
remember their
naanis. Pakistan thus got a targeted revenge.
The tragedy of 1986 was a water-shed for
the separatist movement. Then onwards, fundamentalists rode very high.
Till then they had been fearing that any harassment of hindus and even
a thought of desecration of a single temple might generate anger and annoyance
in the rest of the country. But they found that not to speak of common
people, even the press had felt shy of publishing even the factual brief
news. It was, therefore, no wonder that to get the support of the masses
they openly said that Mujahids were invincible and no power could
face them as they were blessed by Allah. South Kashmir had been chosen
deliberately for communal violence and desecration of temples as a matter
of strategy to spread the message of secession with vengeance.
It was a wonderful time for the dark deeds.
It was more so for the Islamic fundamentalists, who had silently set up
vast networks of fanatical centres in schools, mosques and homes. Kashmiri
terrorists got their cherished opportunity and seized it with both hands.
Pakistan played the conduit for transfer of untold funds of petro-dollars
and lethal weapons from Afghan rebel's stocks. The inflow continued quietly
and increasingly without disturbing the Indian Neros from their favourite
fiddling games. Quietly too was the Pak President, Zia-ul-Haq, the ace
tactician, weaving unmatched, meticulous designs of diabolism. The erstwhile
simple gentle youth of Kashmir were filled with fanaticism and lured to
camps across the border for training in sabotage, death and destruction.
The firm objective of the youth so trained, was to torture the Kashmiri
Hindu, the evil agent of India, the infidel out of the valley.
Then they were to turn to security forces and eventually break up India.
There is no factor other than fundamentalism operating at every step and
in every act. People have become fundamentalists to the extent of annihilating
the entire original native community. They are exhibiting intolerance with
impatience. Not to talk of the common man, it is the elitist class, which
should have displayed religious maturity and restraint, that has turned
fundamentalist. They execute all orders of the terrorists, besides giving
them moral, economic and above all emotional support. This exploitation
of religious sentiment has given a fillip to terrorism in Kashmir. Ironically,
doles are accepted from the hands from whose clutches they would like to
be freed.
Pakistan is fighting a war of attrition
against India on Indian soil, with besotted Indians citizens (Muslim fundamentalists)
as its soldiers and with funds and armaments pouring in from afar. And
it is enjoying the fireworks from the ring-side seat, with foreigners invited
sometimes to watch it through Pak glasses. Pakistan has thus set up with
consummate skill an incredible enterprise with no investment or cost but
which assures it all profits and no loss. Why in the world one might ask
should it wind up this business? Or why come to the negotiating table in
seriousness when it would have to give up something in exchange for nothing
which it does not already hold as booty brought to it by the tribals, the
terrorists and Indian foolhardiness? Islam was and shall continue to be
the mainspring of Pakistan's India policy. The main aim of Pakistan is
to carry forward the process of partition of India. Pakistan believes,
"Kashmir to be an unfinished agenda of partition". Pakistan has
Islam as an ideology and jehad as an instrument. Jehad in its origin and
practice is a purely offensive strategy. Pakistan will be more turbulent
than ever before.
The power centres and their brokers in the
Centre as well as at the state level had decided that these minor irritants,
as they reckoned them, could be dealt with effectively by nothing other
than a liberal policy of appeasement and flow of unaccounted funds. But
appeasement grows what it feed upon and breeds contempt. This simple lesson
had always passed over the head of rulers seeped in political and electoral
quagmire. The secessionists and fundamentalists had thus all these years
the field wide open to them to hunt as they wished. Funds were available
in plenty and arms were thrust into youth's hands. Everything was laid
out for them to become heroes, liberators, defenders of faith (mujahids);
and they would have at their feet to enjoy the best of flesh and fisc,
the aim is to establish an Islamic fundamentalist state out of Kashmir
and cut it away from India. The Indian Government have set their heart
on what they call the political process in Kashmir. There is reported
to be pressure from foreign governments and elements for this. But where
are the political parties and leaders? All are hiding outside the state
at different places of the country and abroad. In direct terms, therefore,
that implies parleys with the terrorists and fundamentalists. Little do
they realise or to like to admit in this context that the terrorist fundamentalists
are the sword and proxy of Pakistan and would do nothing without their
master's approval. At the same time, these terrorist brigades have tasted
blood, power, fisc and flesh. They would need lot of hard stiff persuasion
to be torn away from these pleasures and heroics even when saner
elements within them might wish otherwise.
India's
intelectives, media wizards,
co-ordinators and those belonging to initiatives have been
presenting a distorted picture of the situation. The problem is not of
economic deprivation, as is given out to be, but that of proper utilisation
of human and capital resources and technology, which is what has been blocked
by Article 370. For nearly 45 years now the Central Government's policy
on power keg of Kashmir has, for government after government remained unchanged,
stuck to groove, producing without exception, negative results and impulse.
Inexplicably none of these Governments has been able to recognise the real
measure of its negative and damaging aspects or move away from it even
if only for an experiment. The policy has been two fold-
-
(i) Permissive of anything that goes inside the valley
and by its imposed monarchs, and
-
(ii) Closing the eyes and ears to reason and logic
and responsibility. The result of all this is the utter devastation of
the character and life of the once happy valley with a vicious fall-out
even on the state's otherwise peaceful and larger regions of Ladakh and
Jammu.
India has not done harm to anybody. Indians have
never objected to beliefs or modes of worship of any section of society.
Not to mention the history even in our recent phase, we have given shelter
to Afghan refugees, Iranians, Burmese, Africans even to Chinese. But still
we are under siege by fundamentalist terrorism. Some of our intellectuals,
well meaning intellectuals, go on goodwill missions to Pakistan and also
receive goodwill missions from that country. On the conclusions of these
missions we are told many funny things. People of Pakistan want peace with
India and we should take the initiative to win the trust and confidence
of Pakistan; Pakistan is getting weak internally etc. etc. We should have
give and take policy with Pakistan. We should be closer to each other in
the interests of our own development. When did we refuse these steps? Who
takes initiative in creating problems? India agreed to Kashmir's accession
on 26th October, 1947 only after the state was faced with life and death
problem as a result of Pakistan-sponsored tribal invasion on 22nd October,
1947. India had not till then even agreed to a stand- still agreement with
the state. We gentlemanly handed over to pakistan all the money of Pakistan
that was in our possession even while a bloody war with Pakistan was going
on. We kept our people thirsty and our fields dry but provided water to
Pakistan even when we were at war with each other.
As regards to Pakistan's internal weakness,
this does not make any difference for us. A weak Pakistan has created havoc
for us for the last ten years in Punjab and Kashmir. It is not only the
Government of Pakistan which is harassing us. It is Islamic fundamentalism,
which transcends national, international boundaries with which we are faced.
It may not be a surprise if even the Government of Pakistan might not be
aware of all the facets of conspiracy against us. ISI's jurisdiction is
the whole subcontinent. In Punjab and Kashmir whether terrorists kill the
people or security forces kill the terrorists, it is the flower of India's
youth that is getting liquidated. Pakistan, must be, with jubilation, recalling
the words of Prince Saleem (who later became Mughal King, Jehangir) whom
Akbar had sent to supervise the Mughal war against the Rajputs. When Prince
Saleem summoned the chief commander of his forces and complained about
slow progress of war, the chief replied that it was difficult to distinguish
between the Rajputs with us and those facing us. (There were many Rajputs
who were siding with Akbar). Prince Saleem directed:
"Slaughter them
indiscriminately; on whichever side they are killed, it would be a gain
to Islam". In 1971, we imposed extra taxes on ourselves and levied
a special cess and slowed down our development activities, and finally
plunged into an all-out war. This was done to help East Pakistanis to get
liberated. We were told, once this happened our problems in the North East
would be solved. East Pakistan got independence and Bangladesh came into
existence. But what happened in the North East thereafter? Residuary pakistan
became stronger not weaker. Now she is a nuclear power. And Bangladesh
turned more anti-India than before.
Islamic fundamentalism is more aggressive
in our sub-continent than anywhere else. In Saudi Arabia, a mosque is reported
to have been demolished to facilitate expansion of the palace of the Saudi
King. When Mr.Sahabuddin was told about this, he stated that it might have
happened in Saudi Arabia but it cannot be permitted in India because law
in India is very strict in such matters as Indian Muslims follow the Hanfi
school of Islamic jurisprudence. It is not denied that there are good individual
Muslims and they deserve all praise. But when it comes to crunch they too
find themselves helpless. In Islam individuals do not matter. It is the
collective Islamic will which prevails. Collectivism or Jamaat is the hallmark
of Islam. We have witnessed humanitarian and chivalrous actions of many
Muslims in their individual capacity. But at the crucial moment, they themselves
are forced to fall in line and even have to face death. The grateful Pandits
have been singing hallelujahs to them. The former Pakistan cricket captain,
Imran Khan is a very cosmopolitan man. He is modern, sophisticated and
considered to be secular. If he tours India for creating goodwill our goodwill
teams will rejoice. Hordes of them will join the march from Rajghat to
India Gate castigating Hindus for not crawling under their feet. Indians
would be advised not to rely on army but the goodwill of so nice individuals
as Imran Khan. The ground reality in Pakistan is that such individuals
will always remain individuals. Imran Khan visited Johannesburg (South
Africa) in September, 1992 to raise funds to build a cancer hospital in
Lahore. He held one of fundraising banquets at the Isalmic Cultural Centre
in Natal, south coast town of Umzinte, where the entry of non-Muslims and
women is banned. In spite of strong protest by the fans and admirers of
Imran Khan, he refused to even come out to receive the memorandum. Imran's
non-Muslim admirers were assaulted. Protesters included an executive member
of the local branch of ANC. Nothing moved Imran and he became one with
his Islamic brothers.
In the Kashmir valley, for four decades
we were made to believe that there was the Kashmiriat. If Kashmiriat
were a part of mental and ethical being in the valley, why did it get rubbed
off with the appearance of a gun on a fellow Kashmiri's shoulder? Was not
this Kashmiriat superficial, thinner than even a veneer in the face
of Islamic fundamentalism? When the country was partitioned in 1947, the
White Caps were trying to convince us that the new country of Pakistan
could not last long as it was not viable. But the reality dawned on us
when we were driven out in lakhs from our centuries old ancestral abodes.
The non-viable Pakistan solved its minority problem in its entirety just
in three months. The partition of India was accepted by the Congress leaders
under duress after they got frightened at the Great Calcutta killing (where
countless Hindus were massacred) as a result of Direct Action launched
by the All India Muslim League on 16th of August, 1946. The partition cannot
but be said to be immoral in as much as it was the result not of the consent
of the people but of fanatical blackmail. It was as bad as the murder of
Dunkan by Macbeth. The blood stains left on Hindus are as deep as those
of Lady Macbeth and of which Lady Macbeth said that All the perfumes
of Arabia had failed to remove the stink.
In Lahore, there was a distinguished economist
of world fame, Professor Brij Narain. He had decided to stay put in Pakistan.
As a result of some
fatwa, he was brutally murdered. He had a galaxy
of friends and admirers among the Muslims but none dared to issue even
a condolence message. Lala Bhim Sain Sachar had decided to settle in pakistan.
He had taken oath of loyalty to Pakistan in its constituent Assembly at
Karachi. In fact, he was elected Deputy Leader of the Congress Legislature
Party in Pakistan Constituent Assembly (Legislative). But the brutal murder
of Prof. Brij Narain produced shivers in his body and he immediately came
running to this side of the border. The politicians are happy on phrases
such as political process,
normalisation,
healing wounds
(of terrorists), qualitative change in the situation,
people's
disillusionment with terrorists and what not. They only deceive themselves
and the nation. Since none of these leaders bore a bullet on his chest
or lost a son, they take liberty to play with the lives of people. The
politicians, intellectuals, and progressives are as ignorant of the mind
and mentality of the Muslims in Kashmir as a statue could be of the tears
of a widow. Those Hindus who have lived in Kashmir for the last 45 years
knew exactly where the shoe pinches.
"Mahroom-e-haqiqat hain, sahil ke
tamashai,
ham doob ke samjhe hain daryawoon ki gaharayee"
When Ashfaq Majid Wani got killed by his own
handgrenade,
all the top militants and self-styled area commanders attended his funeral
(30th March, 1990) in presence of police. If the Government was sincere,
all of those wanted terrorists could have been caught or fired upon. The
terrorists fired shots in the air and gave the burial a look of state
burial. But one must confess the Administration was helpless because
George Fernandes, India's Minister for Railways and Kashmir Affairs was
monitoring the situation to ensure that the terrorists were not inconvenienced.
The vacillating policies of the Government help the Muslim fundamentalists
to destroy India under the cover of democracy. Those who shed tears for
hardships to Kashmiris know very well that Kashmiris have accumulated
so much wealth that they can easily bear a quarter century of curfew. The
only exception to this affluence being the Hindus of the valley, who have
been rendered homeless. Mir Qasim and Mufti Sayeed had already made them
a landless class in 1971.
Pakistan has no morals and Kashmiri fanatics
have none either. Rather they are unpredictable. They eulogised Sheikh
Abdullah as bub (the revered father) and their slogan was yi
kari ti kari, bub kari, bub kari (whatever is to be done, it will be
done by Sheikh himself). Supernatural powers were attributed to him. In
the famous Kashmiri rove performance, the womenfolk would sing:
"Jangiyaw goli dicha tas hai dar dari,
tim tim gayi bala apariye". (The armymen fired upon him but the bullets
could not touch him and fell across the mountains). The ladies beat their
breasts when he was ill and also when he died. Hundreds of sheep were slaughtered
daily to propitiate the God of death to save his (Sheikh's ) life. They
shouted malkul mote ko wapas karo. (Send back this Yama the God
of death). In 1977 elections, they shouted: La ill ha illalla: Sheikh
Mohammed Abdullah and he won the election and wiped out Congress(I).
They did not mind any sacrilege in this un-Islamic slogan. But now the
same sons seek his (Sheikh's) bones and are keen to blow his grave.
India's para-military forces in battalion strength, are guarding his grave
near Hazratbal shrine in Srinagar. They brand him infidel. It is no wonder,
they may dig out the bones of Ashfaq Majid for whom they are wailing this
time and declare him traitor and infidel after some time and worship some
other hero. When Bhutto was hanged to death, Kashmiri Muslims shouted Pakistan
Murdabad; Zia-ul-Haq fuq fuq (Zia-ul-haq stinking, stinking)
and burnt establishments, schools and residential houses belonging to
jamaat-i-Isalmi.
They even killed hens and fowls of Jamaat men. They burnt holy books written
and interpreted by Maulana Moudoodi calling them American books.
Supernatural powers were attributed even to the ghost of dead Bhutto. These
very people took out coffins of Zia in 1979 and shouted: mood ha mood
ha, Zia-ul-Haq mood ha (he dies, it is Zia-ul-Haq who died). They hanged
a dog to death shouting it is Zia who is hanged. They took out procession
of donkeys garlanded with shoes and called it Zia-ul-Haq. But now
the same people call him Mardi Haq, Zia- ul-Haq (The man
of truth). In Kashmir, our nation has to deal with such unpredictable people
and no political process can be set afoot in this will of the wisp unless
gun culture is eliminated.
When dealing with a treacherous enemy there
can be no soft options. The terrorists being the greatest and formidable
enemies of mankind and human rights, they must be treated as traitors and
tried in courts martial and hanged after summary trials. It is beyond one's
comprehension what Kashmiri terrorists really are. The only predictable
thing about them is that they are unpredictable and dealing with them with
soft wand is to commit Hara-kiri and destroy the nation. The nexus between
Pakistan's ISI and the terrorists in the valleys has been established beyond
a shadow of doubt. In such a situation of civil war conditions, international
mafia groups rule the roots by helping the underworld traffickers of arms
and drugs. The drum beaters of parochialism and fundamentalism are working
overtime. The shadows of events from across the border are lengthening.
Lethal weapons are continuously pouring in. Recent events have proved that
the coast of Western India is the main route for arms smuggling. The overall
fabric shows too many loose threads, too many stitches. Terrorism in Kashmir
is against the Kafir, (the infidel). It is a movement to set the Balkanisation
of our ancient country in motion so that India as a State breaks. Sikh
terrorists in Punjab were used as cannon fodder. Once the purpose is served
they will be dealt with appropriately as Sikhs were targeted in 1947. The
Indian nation should learn to live as a nation and firmly resist and decisively
defeat the well-planned theocratic onslaught. It must over-ride all religious,
sectarian, regional, communal ideological and political considerations.
Any sign of weakness or lack of cool- calculated and firm response to the
Pakistani threats and acts of subversion would only encourage adventurism
which can have disastrous consequences. In fact, it has always happened.
Indian authorities have obtained clinching prove of Pakistani hand in Bombay
blasts on Black Friday, the 12th of March, 1993. The brain behind these
blasts, Pakistan's ISI is reported to have engineered the whole subversion
in collusion with Dawood Ibrahim, the Bombay underworld don based in Dubai
and the Memon family of Bombay, particularly Ibrahim Abdul Razak Memon
alias Tiger. There should be no disagreement among our political parties
about defending India's territorial integrity. Knee jerk reactions and
frequent ad hoc changes in the policy give very wrong signals both in the
valley and across the border. The stupid policy of keeping security forces
subservient to local secessionist administration must be reversed at once.
Also, docile diplomacy must be activised.
Some political parties, feeling that they
have nothing meaningful to offer, vaguely and in an irresponsible manner,
talk of granting more autonomy to the state. They ignorantly, perhaps innocently
also refer to pre and post 1953 position. As Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah was
removed from power in that year, impression is sought to be created that
this was done to deprive Kashmiris of their autonomy. This is far from
truth. The Sheikh was removed for his anti- national role. Sheikh had got
wind through his several secret meetings with American officials that the
Americans were not averse to carving out an independent state out of the
areas which had acceded to India thus fulfilling his life-long ambition.
He began to pick up quarrels over one trumped up charge or another with
the Central leadership. He launched a tirade against the people of Jammu
and maligned them in season and out of season. The bewildered Jawaharlal
Nehru and his senior colleagues like Maulana Azad, Rafi Ahmed Kidwai and
others. The more they tried to reason with him and see what had irked him,
the more adamant he became and slighted them in public and various Friday
post- prayer meetings where he instigated the Muslim mobs against India.
This was only a ploy to enact the final fiat - the declaration of independence
with American support. The conspiracy was thwarted by the timely action
of his own disillusioned colleagues, Bakshi, Sadiq and Qasim. Dr.Karan
Singh who was head of state had, in his reports, warned the Centre of grave
consequences for the country if no timely action was taken. Mr.Bhim Singh
led a vigorous student's agitation in Jammu against the State Government.
Mufti Mohammad Sayeed, who, on return from Aligarh University, joined the
National Conference, would do well to go through his own speeches, which
he made during that period, against Sheikh's conspiracy. The noted liberal
leader, Pandit Hriday Nath Kunzru had described the event of Sheikh's removal
from power, as the first and only good news that had come after independence.
The Communists had rejoiced on this action of Jawaharlal Nehru. The Communist
Party of India (there was only one Communist Party at that time) was the
main opposition group both in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha and it officially
congratulated the Prime Minister on this democratic action. Its leaders,
A.K.Gopalan in the Lok Sabha and P.Sundaramayya in the Rajya Sabha applauded
the Government on this issue in the two Houses. The Communists will do
well to go through their own mouthpiece, the
New Age to realise
what they felt and did at that time. During the Governments of Bakshi Ghulam
Mohammad and Ghulam Mohammad Sadiq, a few select provisions were introduced
in the state, such as the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, Election Commission,
Comptroller and Auditor General of India, etc. This was done not to oblige
the Central Government but for the benefit of the people of the state and
mainly to make the state Government responsible and accountable to the
wishes and aspirations of the common man. Would any one suggest that these
are restraints to the state's autonomy which need to be done away with.
Communications were supposed to be Central subject even in the Sheikh's
scheme of things. But he had bluntly refused to hand over the state's telephone
and telegraph services to the Centre. These services were in the most primitive
stage in the state and needed urgent improvement and expansion. But Sheikh
was unmindful of all these. During his stewardship of the state from early
1948 to the middle of 1953, he had not cared to add even a single line
to the state's telephone system. Subsequently, Central Government had to
pump in crores of rupees to bring some semblance of modernity to the system
and make up for the neglect. This is how the state's autonomy was encroached
from 1953. As a matter of fact, after the exit of Sheikh Abdullah in 19523,
autonomy of the state increased rather than diminished and this autonomy
continued to be abused for personal purposes by the leaders as exemplified
by the Sheikh himself earlier. All the political leaders, be they of the
National Conference or the National Congress have been trampling over the
rights of the common people in the name of autonomy. Politics in the state
was debased: fraud, favouritism, nepotism and communalism reigned supreme.
Off the cup solutions may sound splendid in the drawing rooms and at cocktail
parties but the realities and portents are far too grim to permit levity.
When Sheikh Abdullah returned to power in 1975, he appointed a high level
Committee to review all Central laws, which had been extended to the state
after 1953. This committee came to the conclusion that whatever laws had
been extended to the state had benefited the people and had not in any
way encroached upon the state's autonomy. Sheikh and his colleagues were
satisfied and closed the matter. This review was as per the provisions
of the Indira-Abdullah accord.
In our country, lie never dies even when
exposed -- for the simple reason of official patronage to it in the long
years of dynastic dispensation, which has produced a crop of public sector
intellectuals, sarkari historians and Marxist libbers. Some of them of
hardened Communist variety, had their training under the British, when
they were recruited whole-sale for the war propaganda machine after 1942
betrayal of the Quit India movement. While they stayed put at vantage
points even after the dawn of independence, they were later joined by Nehruvian
courtiers and hero-worshippers, who sanctified every secular- socialist
myth as gospel truth. It was the magic miracle of such myth-making that
Sheikh Abdullah was paraded as a model of secular nationalism. These nehruvian
and Marxist secular fundamentalists of post-independence variety have been
lying, lying and lying simply to fight the bogey of Hindu Communalism.
They embarked on old tirade of suppressio veri and suggestio falsi. The
CPM leader, Mr.Harkishan Singh Surjeet was attacked by the Jamaat-i-Islami
activists in Khanyar, Srinagar, in June, 1982 at a meeting with the party
workers. he indicted not only the National Conference activists but even
the Sheikh for this attack. Asked why he did not say the truth that it
were Jamaat- i-Islami workers, he said he wanted to avoid giving a handle
to the B.J.P.
The secessionists are for Nizame-e-Mustafa.
The Muslim youth who have taken to the gun are on a war path to throw off
the shackles of Indian domination. They are fighting a so-called
holy war to free themselves from the secular bondage of India. and then
turn the Napaak (impure) land of Hindus into Pak (pure) land
so that Pakistan or the pure land may consist of the entire sub-continent.
Nationalist India must show enough intelligence to understand the strategy
of Syed Shahabuddin. He had launched a systematic campaign to project a
united Muslim community as the natural ally of a section of fragmented
and Mandalised India. If successful, this will negate the entire nation
building process and reduce India to a chaotic amalgam of fractions, castes
and communities. A mere relaxation of security arrangements and greater
doses of autonomy will not stop this rapid integration of Kashmiri Islam
with the international Islamic resurgence.
Communists did build a strong state. Nothing moved
in the Soviet Union without the sanction of the state. Nothing belonged
to you either. Your house, your job, your pay-slip at the end of the month,
your ration card, your wife, your children, your friends, all belonged
to the state. It was a powerful state with a big army, one of the biggest
in the world, large steel plants and coal mines, atomic power stations
and missiles and of course, nuclear devices. After nearly three quarters
of a century of the kind of steady build up, the Russians should have been
on the top of the world. Instead the country has vanished from the map
of the world. Now it is being referred to as the former Soviet Union as
a dead person is referred to late so-and-so. The most powerful country
in the world as the marxists believed has just disappeared from view. The
country has gone, the army has gone, the missiles are rotting in the sun
and the arsenal of nuclear bombs is gathering dust.
Why did the Soviet Union disintegrate? Because
there was nothing to hold it together. You destroy the bonds that bring
people together and you destroy the society itself. These bonds are not
material bonds nor are they usual give and take of commerce. The bonds
are cultural and give and take of personal and family relationship and
above all give and take of ideas that define right and wrong, good and
evil. Those ideas are rooted in creed, culture and tradition, without which
there can be no nation and no country no matter how strong the country
is. The strongest state in the world can collapse and go as the Soviet
Union did. Every nation in the world has its national culture. The British
do have and so do the Americans. In India, it is Hinduness or give it any
name. Take away Hinduness from Indian culture and you have a big zero,
a big hole at its very heart. The so-called secular culture is precisely
this: a culture with a hole in the centre, the kind of culture that the
Nehruites and the Marxists tried to create.
Our country has been one on the spiritual
and cultural plain even though administratively or even politically we
have been diverse. Vande Mataram united the minds of men and women
in our struggle against foreign power. How shameful it is that Nehruites
made us to believe that it was a communal expression. It was said so after
their tryst with ambition was fulfilled after 1947. It was the oneness,
territorial integrity and very survival of our ancient country which is
under the assault in Kashmir at the hands of secessionists and terrorists.
Our security forces are discharging their
duties in absolutely hostile conditions where they are not sure about their
life for a single moment. The local administration is against them. Instances
of the involvement of the local police and intelligence with the terrorists
are not an exception. The politicians are out to demoralise them and the
Pakistan ISI is meticulously conducting the whole campaign against India
both from inside and outside the state, from Pakistan soil and the capital
of India. Terrorism is a form of combat, which is irregular, unpredictable,
and without boundaries. The terrorist is always in possession of that indispensable
feature of combat, initiative. Security forces never set the agenda. Terrorists
decide the time, place and method by which to engage. The Indian Government
by putting spokes in the functioning of security forces, is committing
suicide in Kashmir. It is also committing a heinous crime of getting the
jawans killed brutally by the fanatics terrorists owing allegiance to Pakistan.
The murder of jawans will cost the nation dearly and it is paving the way
for another spell of foreign rule in India. The undecided politicians have
not been able to save a single innocent life but restrained armed forces
to minimum use of force against the terrorists. The least the people of
India can do is to keep under leash the
progressives, who though
small in number but flush with continuous flow of funds, and prevent them
from making false and obnoxious propaganda against our security forces.
The jawans of these forces, while standing guard to provide security and
maintain peace, live form minute to minute. They do not know when and from
which side bullet, grenade or rocket will hit them. And when it comes they
are bound to lose their life. The guerrilla bands heavily armed with kalashnikovs,
rockets and grenades are in hiding in and around Srinagar. They have turned
every road and lane into a possible death trap. Jawans sacrifice themselves
so that nation lives and the country is saved. The jawans and officers
of our armed forces and para-military forces are standing guard from Siachen
in Ladakh to Kutch in Gujarat covering states of Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab,
Rajasthan and Gujarat. This is our border with Pakistan. The entire border
is alive. Not only are we faced with direct Pakistani intrusion always
at the time of their choosing but also Pakistani sponsored fierce terrorism
in Punjab and Jammu and Kashmir as also international drug mafia, smugglers
and Afghan mercenaries. And yet we have had Prime Ministers in India (not
to mention Hind-Pak friendshipwallas), who have been taking credit for
getting chummy with Pakistan leaders and pledging everlasting friendship
with them while corpse after corpse Of Indian jawans surface in Kashmir.
They and their like have been mouthing verbiage about the need to bring
terrorists to the negotiating table. What is the latter's response? Burning
alive young Indian officers, murdering innocent men, women and children
and planting bombs at places like Delhi's IGI airport, Palika Bazar, Mohan
Singh place etc. etc. Towards the last week of may 1993, 1993, Mr.V.M.Tarkunde,
Mr.Rajinder Sachar and some others representing some human rights groups
in India, paid a five day visit to Kashmir. Mr.Sachar in his report said:
"Vast
masses of people in Kashmir including members of various professions, have
a warm appreciation for the armed struggle bt the militants". Sachar
adds: "People are not apologetic for the use of guns by the militants
and they do not plead for any consideration for them because to them every
militant is a martyr for the cause". So the armed struggle should not
be interfered with. Mr.Sachar has only hate and contempt for security forces.
He doesn't want interrogation of any suspects because that causes alienation.
He does not want guerillas to be chased because that may damage property
which will cause alienation. He wants on-the-spot cash payment to
the people as compensation for any losses because delay causes alienation.
He wants that if any member of the army or security forces commit any irregularity,
while performing his duty he should immediately be punished and whole process
should be broadcast over public address system in total disregard of rules
and regulation governing his service. Not doing causes
alienation.
Sachar is opposed to the appointment of any person from outside the state
as Chief Justice of the state's High Court because that causes
alienation
and will be counter-productive. How local man will be
productive
may be known to him alone. He wants Government not to transgress the rule
of the law while dealing with secessionist guerillas, terrorists, their
collaborators and those who have warm appreciation for their armed struggle,
but wants summary, arbitrary and on-the-spot public punishment for the
security forces for any lapse which may have caused inconvenience to the
above categories of people. Denial to judgement.
The policy adopted by the Government of
India sets its own price tag and the cost may over-run the benefit if the
country lurches from right to left and left to right and nowhere in the
process. It may be possible to walk on a tight rope. But one cannot walk
on a rope which is snapped. Some Indian leaders and intellectuals have
become prisoners of their inbuilt bias and have never shown the courage
to call a spade a spade. The negative forces that have cropped up, would
not have acquired strength if the one-eyed stand had not persisted.
Even those who have remained passive cannot escape blame. Confusion and
delay to regain India's lost administrative turf in Kashmir will simply
give Pakistan and the terrorists the most precious resources they can ask
for --- time. Their strategy is to wear New Delhi down to such an extent
that the cost of maintaining Kashmir will become an impossible burden;
or to keep a ready made Pakistan inside India to be used by Pakistan to
create constant problems. Unfortunately in the country an impression has
been allowed to spread that the Government is only waiting for a suitable
time and formula for surrendering to the secessionists, as the statements
about granting greater autonomy show. To whom the Government of India wants
to give greater autonomy? Nasir-ul-Islam of Hizb-ul-Mujahideen has said
by way of policy statement: "Our objective is to get independence for
Islam. We want to be part of Islamic bloc. Our mission is to Islamise the
whole universe as God has ordered us". Comical Farooq Abdullah, from
his hiding behind a concrete wall of Indian Security forces, lets out a
sound of scream now and then. Sometimes he directs flares to convey his
switch of loyalty and fidelity to the secessionists from behind the enemy
lines. He has not abandoned his tantrums. He is luxuriously settled in
U.K. He specially came from London to present himself in Srinagar on Pakistan's
Independence Day. Well-protected by Indian commando force and travelling
by a bullet-proof car provided by the Government, he made all-out effort
to make himself acceptable to the terrorists. He has been from day one
trying to do so). He issued a statement on his arrival that was on 14th
August, 1992, that Kashmir was a disputed issue and needs to be settled
among all the three concerned parties, India, Pakistan and Kashmir. The
timing of the statement was carefully chosen. It was made on Pakistan's
Independence Day, almost coincided with the visit of Pakistan's Foreign
Secretary, Shahryar Khan to New Delhi for talks with his counterpart on
bilateral issues which included Kashmir and was on the eve of non-aligned
summit in Jakarta. That shows Farooq is not guileless when it comes to
creating problems.
New Delhi must realise that its coffers
are funding the separatist movement through the subsidised petrol and the
telephone network including STD / International STD. Srinagar is connected
to Muzaffarabad under SARC programme. While Srinagar-Jammu lines are mostly
out of order, Srinagar-Muzaffarabad line is faultless. This has solved
the terrorists' communication problem. Should the state continue to provide
those who have declared war against it, the wherewithal for mobility and
communications? Should it continue to keep on its pay-roll government servants
who refuse allegiance to the country? Should it continue to supply electricity
to premises that are used to preach jehad against the state? These hard
decisions have to be made if India's writ is to run again in the valley.
At present, in the Kashmir valley how are government contracts given and
jobs arranged? No hanky panky -- tenders, as prescribed by the rules, are
invited and so are applications for jobs. Only later it is stated by those
involved in the selection process that
hon'ble militant ABC or hon'ble
militant XYZ has desired that the contract or job or supply order be
given to so and so person and the orders are issued accordingly. Due process
of law fully observed. Something apologists for terrorists who are around
in plenty in the Capital of India, can lap up with joy! During the financial
year 1991-92 (ending 31st March, 1992) in the Public Works Department and
Public Health Engineering Department alone 461 contracts were awarded to
Mujahideen
on the dictation of the terrorists. (The figures for the financial year
ending 31st March, 1992 have not yet officially become available). India's
former Home Minister, Mufti Mohammed Sayeed, talking to reporters on September
8, 1992 said that it was an open secret that militants did not only control
the day to day functioning of the local administration but receive and
channelise the vast chunk of development funds. Kashmir terrorists have
launched a monthly journal
Mountain Valley Kashmir since April,
1992. Its aim is to advance the cause of terrorism and subversion in Kashmir.
It also provides guidance and inspiration to the guerillas how to go about.
The advertisement tariff is on a very very high side. But a look at the
magazine indicates that the Jammu and Kashmir state government has taken
over the responsibility of making the magazine financially not only viable
but also profitable. A look at the June, 1992 issue (the only one which
became somehow available) indicated that the Government Departments like
Forest, Tourism etc. had inserted redundant and aimless advertisements
costing more than Rs. 1.5 lakhs. It is just a petty example of who finances
insurgency in Kashmir. The Urdu newspapers published from Srinagar carry
only statements and notices of terrorists but are run on government advertisements.
After Congress was returned to power at the Centre in July, 1991, the Prime
Minister, Mr.P.V.Narasimha Rao was persuaded by his discredited partymen
and political allies from the valley to fill some 12,000 vacancies in the
local bureaucracy. Predictably, the secessionist organisations hijacked
the recruitments and succeeded in filling up the posts with their nominees.
So the government apparatus becomes an agency of subversion and tax-payers
of India end up subsidising a movement for another partition of the country.
While the State and Central Governments
are ever willing to shell out any amount for that notorious exercise of
appeasement its singular failure on finding the required money for essentialities
in Jammu region is deplorable. What we are witnessing is a deliberate attempt
to impose indignities and humiliation on the people in the Jammu region.
And also generate extra stress and strain over the existing economic infrastructure
to create ill-will and tension between the local people and the refugees
who have been forced to take shelter there. The entrenched communal bureaucracy
of the state is doing this silently but resolutely to serve the cause of
separation. Their immediate aim appears to be to force an exodus from Jammu
also so that the number of nationalists is reduced in Jammu region also.
Their motto: if Kashmir valley can come under the thumb of terrorists Jammu
may not be far away. In Jammu, the Government pleads paucity of funds.
Why the State Government has no money is, of course, attributable to lack
of proper governance, in that the state has failed to realise the due electric
tariff or any other dues from the valley. No attempt, however, has been
made to effect recoveries for any supplies provided ar any services rendered.
Recoveries are made from Jammu region only. On the other hand, supplies
and services are increased more and more in the Kashmir valley.
There is an urgent need to change the mindscap
of India's political leaders. There present attitude is soft, selfish and
permissive. We get up every morning, morning after morning and read in
the papers that our hard-nosed rulers are keen to have what they call political
process. What is their political process? It means enabling the drunkards
to drink and gamblers to gamble. But their political parties have been
left in a state of atrophy, their leaders living in retreat while their
counterparts from the valley are living on doles like rest of refugees.
It appears relevant to quote the noted journalist, Khushwant Singh who
wrote in the Hindustan Times of October 30, 1992, "we have poured in
crores of rupees into the valley, most of it was cream off by the educated
upper class that ruled Kashmir on our behalf. We could never trust them
to have free and fair elections and made sure that people we approved of
were elected. We have come to such a pass that if there was an honest election
today, to a man Kashmiri Muslims would cast their vote against continuing
association with India. We are not up against handful of dissidents but
insurrection against our presence in the valley. Nevertheless, we have
no option but to hang on to the valley because if we left we could be jeopardising
the future of millions of Indian Muslim brethren". Mr.Khushwant Singh
has not cared or dared to say who are we. This is deliberate. Because
he and like of him know fully well but are not prepared to confess that
we are the same people who kept the people of Kashmir outside the
Indian Constitution. What was perceived as a temporary and provisional
agreement to facilitate the integration of the state, in practice was made
an instrument for undermining of India's sovereignty and abdication of
responsibilities. A long-term solution requires a fundamental reorientation
of approach and recognition of three essential realities. First that over-doses
of autonomy and the perpetuation of Article 370 argue against the full
integration of the state into India. Secondly, a soft state compromises
security and encourages subversion. Finally that the transformation of
Kashmiri Islam nullifies the possibility of permanent Muslim reproachment
with the Indian Republic. To offset the damage some go as far as to suggest
that a programme for the demographic Indianisation of the state is inescapable.
In Kashmir, Islam has been systematically supplanted by a rigid and doctrinaire
faith whose political goal is an Islamic state. It is the ideological regime
that has provided the inspiration and motivation for the organised expulsion
of the Hindu minority from the valley and the ruthless persecution of those
Kashmiri Muslims who do not fall in. As things stand today there is no
common ground or points of convergence between the commitment to a pluralistic,
liberal state -- whether organised along federal or confederal lines --
and the growing support for an Islamic republic built along the ideological
premises of the Jamaat-i-Islami.
It should never be lost sight of that terrorists
have links with international gangs, have access to sophisticated weaponry
like grenade launchers, disposable mortars, high quality snipper rifles
and plastic explosives. The threat from high quality explosives is particularly
serious. Even chemical and biological devices are accessible to terrorists,
as there is no stringent check to prevent this. Indian police has only
limited knowledge of such devices. India's misfortune is that any assessment,
which goes against the grain of conventional wisdom is brushed under the
carpet. Faced with the collapse of brave experiment in national integration,
the supine Indian intelligentsia and political classes appear determined
to bury awkward dissent in a conspiracy of embarrassed silence. Unable
and unwilling to accept reality, the Indian political establishment has
been paralysed into dejection and defeatism. Confusion is bound to be caused
when terrorists, who have the pistols on the throats of our jawans, are
serenaded by a troupe of Members of Parliament no-less with pleading for
talks. It is a different matter that the same Members of Parliament
are reported to have felt like Five Star prisoners in Srinagar. But that
does not open anyone's eyes. Why then is every one chiming in with the
song of political process while nobody makes even a passing reference
to the deaths that the security forces have been sustaining? From four
corners of the country they are sent to Kashmir,there to lay down their
lives to ensure that Kashmir is not chopped off from India. From four corners
of the country Members of Parliament are picked up, flown in luxury to
Srinagar, feted under the security of the same jawans, but what do they
do? Plead with their killers to come and negotiate how much and how quickly
should Kashmir be chopped off from the country. There is no softer term
for this attitude than outrageous betrayal of martyrs. One need not talk
of lakhs of Kashmiri Hindus nor of the numberless Kashmiri Muslims, who
are innocent and have also been suffering. For it is natural for Kashmiris
to suffer when their houses have been set on fire by the terrorists and
guns have been held to their heads. It is their Kashmir. The state belongs
to each one of them. In the long history of man's greed it is not unheard
of that the inhabitants of a city or state should have to suffer external
aggression. But what of the jawans who are only discharging their duty
in Kashmir and dying with a smile on their face? Does the Government of
India not owe it at least to these dead and dying soldiers and patriots
not to obfuscate issues once again but give a clear lead to the jawan in
the field? By what cannon of justice is it permitted to talk of the jawan
doing his duty and terrorist subverting a legally constituted Government
in the same breath? It is an obscenity of the worst order that an Indian
soldier should have to die on a street in Kashmir with Jai Hind
on his lips and political process ringing in his ears. History will
never forgive an administration that perpetuates such an atrocity on its
own soldiers. The time has now come for the Centre to clear its perceptions
and guard against chickening out at this crucial juncture. India has either
to retain Kashmir or see the beginning of disintegration.
"Gardish-e-Ayyam tera Shukriyya,
Hamne har pahloo se dunia dekhli"
|