Chapter 1
Teritorial And Political Analysis
"When speaking is duty, silence is guilt"
Maharaja Gulab Singh,
one of the most remarkable, soldier-statesman that India had produced in
the nineteenth century, was the founder of the State of Jammu and Kashmir
as it existed in 1947 before the Pakistani invasion in October that year.
One of his distinguished Generals, Zorawar Singh conquered Ladakh, Baltistan
and Western Tibet. General Zorawar Singh's expedition began in 1834 and
culminated in 1841. Since Kashmir Valley was not under Gulab Singh at that
time, the route to Ladakh and beyond followed by Zorawar Singh was through
Kishtwar, Padar and Zanskar. It was more difficult but much shorter than
the route passing through Kashmir Valley. The Valley of Kashmir had been
under the Sikh kingdom of Lahore. Consequent to signing of two treaties:
Treaty of Lahore (9-3-1846) between Sikh kingdom at Lahore and Gulab Singh
and Treaty of Amritsar (16-3-1846) between Gulab Singh and the British,
Maharaja Gulab Singh was recognised as an independent ruler of all territories
already in his possession together with the Valley of Kashmir, which till
then formed a separate province of Sikh kingdom of Lahore. Kashmir Valley
was then controlled by Sheikh Imam-ud-Din as Governor appointed by the
Lahore Darbar (administration). He was secretly instructed by Lal Singh,
the Prime Minister of Lahore Darbar, who had personal enmity with Gulab
Singh, not to hand over the possession of the Valley to Gulab Singh. Therefore,
Gulab Singh's army faced stiff resistance when it reached Kashmir to occupy
it in terms of the Treaty of Amritsar. Lakhpat, one of the top Generals
of Gulab Singh, lost his life during the unexpected encounter. Thus, Gulab
Singh had to resort to superior and effective force to get the Kashmir
Valley in spite of his claim to it under the Treaty. On behalf of the Lahore
Darbar one Nathu Singh was controlling Gilgit. He transferred his allegiance
to Gulab Singh, who now became the master of Gilgit as well. By 1850, Gulab
Singh had become both de facto and de jure master of entire Jammu region
including Poonch, Rajauri and Bhimber, Kashmir Valley, Ladakh, Baltistan
and Dardistan including Gilgit. The States of Hunza, Nagar and Ishkuman
adjoining Sinkiang were added to the State by his son, Maharaja Ranbir
Singh.
Maharaja Gulab Singh welded together such diverse
and far-flung areas as Jammu bordering on the Punjab, Ladakh bordering
on Tibet and Gilgit bordering on Sinkiang, Afghanistan and Central Asia
across the Pamirs. The events and circumstances leading to the birth of
Jammu and Kashmir State made a heterogenous conglomeration of diverse and
distinct areas devoid of any type of unity, geographical, social, cultural
or linguistic except obedience to a common over-lord - the Rajput Maharaja.
From linguistic and cultural point of view, this vast and varied area,
whose only unity lay in a uniform and unified administrative system under
the Dogra rulers, could be divided into six distinct peoples with a distinct
past. A proper understanding of this basic distinction, among the peoples
and regions, is essential for a proper understanding of the Kashmir problem,
as it developed after partition of India in 1947.
Jammu region: This is the homeland of the
founder of the State as also the Hindus popularly called the Dogras. It
is directly contiguous to Himachal Pradesh (a state of India). The language
of the region is Dogri, which includes some Pahari dialects and is written
in Devanagari (Hindi) script.
Ladakh: To the North of Himachal Pradesh
lies the extensive plateau of Ladakh. The people of Ladakh are Buddhists.
The Kargil district of the region contains Shia (Muslim) population. The
language of the region is Bodhi or Ladakhi.
Baltistan: This is the third distinct region
inhabited by the Balti people. It lies to the West of Ladakh. Baltistan
was conquered by Maharaja Gulab Singh along with Ladakh between 1834 and
1841. People of Baltistan have a distinct social and cultural life and
speak Balti language. The region was over-run by Pakistani troops after
a protracted war (with India) in 1948.
Gilgit: The fourth distinct in the region
is Gilgit which is known as Dardistan. The region includes the tributory
states of Hunza, Nagar, Chilas, Punial, Ishkuman, Kuh and Ghizar. The people
belong to the Dardic race and are closely connected with Chitralis in race,
culture and language. They are mostly followers of Ismaili sect headed
by the Agha Khan (Muslims). This region was conquered by Maharaja Gulab
Singh's son, Maharaja Ranbir Singh between 1846 and 1860. Thousands of
Dogra soldiers lost their lives in the campaigns that led to the conquest
of this inhospitable but strategically very important region. The whole
Dardistan including Gilgit has been merged with Pakistan and is governed
by the Pakistani Central Government. This area has not been included even
in the so called Azad-Kashmir (literally means liberated Kashmir.
That is what the Pakistanis call the portion of Kashmir under their occupation).
Pakistani President General Zia-ul-Haq had declared that these territories
which includes the Silk Route that connects
Pakistan to China, might have once been part of
Jammu and Kashmir, but now they are a part of Pakistan. The Northern areas,
which include Dardistan and Baltistan, have already been integrated fully
with Pakistan. In a quiet behind the scene announcement the Pakistani Ministry
of Kashmiri Affairs and Northern Areas has divided these areas into five
civil districts - Gilgit, Skardu, Chilas, Gohkoch and Khalpo. The administration
of these districts is under Pakistan's direct control and now Pakistan's
laws are applicable. During the peak period of cold war when Pakistan was
an active member of Western military bloc, Gilgit had been kept at the
disposal of the United States of America, who had established here a most
modern and big-air base. Subsequently, when India-China border differences
developed, Pakistan, to exhibit her inherent enmity to India, handed over
to China important territory in the Northern portion of this area and also
opened the Silk Road which passes through this region and connects Pakistan
to China. Gilgit had come under Hindu and Buddhist influence very early.
It was part of the Khotan province in Ashoka's (3rd century B.C. Indian
emperor) empire. A recent find of Buddhist and Sanskrit books near Gilgit
confirms this view. A class of people is held in high esteem even now.
The people belonging to this class are expected not to eat beef and to
remain clean. They were the Gilgit brahmins before their forced conversion
to Islam. Aman Ullah Khan of the JKLF (Jammu & Kashmir Liberation Front)
belongs to this area of Dardistan. This is his homeland. He is not a Kashmiri.
He is an intruder in Kashmir affairs. His own homeland has been fully and
forcibly merged into Pakistan. Even basic and primary human rights have
been denied to the people there. They are not even considered fit for local
self-government. Aman Ullah never talks of his kith and kin, who have been
enslaved in the manner like of which has never been imagined. Aman Ullah
had long left his homeland and had settled in the U.K. He was picked up
by some Western agencies as a might be needed person and provide
all facilities in U.K., America and Pakistan. It was part of cold war stategy
to take up the Kashmir issue, in isolation of India and Pakistan, in case
exigency of situation demanded. Otherwise he is not even remotely linked
to Kashmir and Kashmiris. His own homeland has ceased to be distinct identity
and even a mention of his area sends shiver into his body.
The Punjabi region: The Punjabi speaking
districts of Mirpur, parts of Poonch and Muzaffarabad form the fifth distinct
region. This corridor type belt is culturally, linguistically and socially
part of Punjab. It is this small area which is called Azad Kashmir.
As apolitical and diplomatic strategy and to have a distinct base for harassing
India, Pakistan has provided a symbolic administrative set-up here. There
is a President, the Prime Minister, Assembly and other propaganda stuff
but actual strings are pulled by the Ministry of Kashmir Affairs of the
Pakistan government. The area has remained very backward. The people especially
the youngsters here are fed on the promise that sunny days will come when
they will have free access to the Kashmir Valley for enjoying the good
things of life and having everything in plenty. But people here have no
affinity with Kashmiris. There has been centuries old tussle between tough
and rough Punjabis and peace loving Kashmiris. They contemptuously call
the Kashmiri Muslims as hatoes. These areas, even before 1947 (year
of Indian independence), had earned much notoriety as the area perennially
infested with bandits. Many of them used to be hatchmen of rival landlords.
There were no land reforms there. Numerous landlords became front-rank
politicians. The area provided fertile soil for the growth of new generation
of Mafias during the Afghan war in the early eighties. Narco-terrorism
and kalashnikov culture made the area as armed camp/base. Political grip
of the Pakistan army is a fact of life in this area. To call this area
Azad Kashmir is scandalous. Its correct description would be Pakistan
occupied Punjabi speaking areas of erstwhile Jammu and Kashmir state. A
large number of people from this area especially from Mirpur have settled
in U.K., U.S.A. and other foreign countries. These people mislead the world
by calling themselves Kashmiris and with huge oil funds (from Saudi Arabia)
at their disposal, disinform the West by claiming to be fighting for self-determination
of Kashmir. In this regard they talk of North and South Korea, North and
South Yemen and even mention the Berlin wall. Some Westerners do take this
patently wrong assertion on its face value. These Mirpuris like Aman Ullah
Khan, who is a Dardi, take the name of Kashmiris. Now more about Aman Ullah
Khan. As a student, he did cross into the Kashmir Valley and studied in
a school in the border tehsil (administrative sub- division in a district)
of Kupwara, which was then part of Baramulla district. This was to take
advantage of free education and all other facilities which were available
on this side. During the hey days of Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad (ex Chief Minister
of Jammu and Kashmir state of India), hundreds of young boys crossed over
this side not only to get free academic education but also get nominated
to medical and Engineering Colleges in India. After getting professional
education free of any cost, they migrated to the United States, the U.K.
and Arab and Gulf countries. For this the modus operandi was simple. They
had to cross the border illegally as strayed individuals, get arrested
and then issue a long statement to the effect that living conditions in
the Pakistan occupied areas were apalling and that people were fully disillusioned.
They declared their full faith in the leadership and idealogy of the National
Conference (the ruling political party in J&K state). This was enough
to see them through. The same lot have organised themselves against the
Indian nation.
Before partition of India in 1947, these areas
had a mixed population of Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims. But in 1947, Hindus
and Sikhs were massacred and those who could escape had to take shelter
outside the State. Muzaffarabad district was blooming with Sikh population.
They were made special targets of Muslim wrath. Thousands of Sikh women
jumped into the river Jhelum and got drowned to save their own honour and
that of womenhood. The refugees who escaped form Muzaffarabad district
came to Kashmir valley for shelter. But Sheikh Abdullah, his National Conference
and particularly the Communists did not allow these refugees to keep their
foot in the Valley saying that they belonged to the Punjabi speaking areas
of the State and had no links with Kashmiris or the Kashmir Valley. These
people were State subjects, first class and bonafide residents of the State
of Jammu and Kashmir. But since they did not belong to the Kashmir Valley
they were called non-Kashmiris. Thousands of such people who had per force
to pass through the Valley to escape the Pakistani fire and terror behind,
were pushed beyond the Pir Panchal range across the Banihal pass. On the
contrary, Muslims from Tibet were welcomed with open arms and special arrangements
were made for their settlement in the Srinagar city (capital of Jammu and
Kashmir).
Kashmir valley: The sixth region is the
Valley of Kashmir. This home of sage Kashyap who made a breach near Baramulla
and thus turned a lake into a valley, has been called the crown of India.
The medieval historian Al Beroni has recorded that the Vale of kashmir
was considered as high school of Hindu conscience like Varanasi. The Valley
begins at Verinag in Anantnag district and ends at Khodanyar in Baramulla
district. Once a seat of Sanskrit learning and nandanvan, where
saints and yogis (ascetics) used to come for contemplation and meditation
and learning, is now a predominantly Muslim area.
Racially, the Kashmiris belong to the Aryan
stock. The Kashmiri language originally written in Sharda script, a form
of Devanagri script, has a rich literature. But under the influence of
Islam, this ancient script has been discarded and the language is now without
a script. In the absence of a natural script of its own, this language
has ceased to be used anywhere in any form. It has been reduced to a spoken
dialect only. Time is not far off when this ancient language will be wiped
off altogether. Although the Government of India has included this language
in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution and has adopted it as one of
the national languages, yet due to the state government's religious prejudice
the language is dying. The officially recognised Persio-Arabic script has
been adopted to placate the Muslims at the cost of the age-old Sharda script.
This Persio-Arabic Sharda script. The Persio-Arabic script is defective
and incapable of rendering Kashmiri sounds correctly. It is solely dependent
on scribes and calligraphers who are becoming extinct now in the valley.
This script has failed to take advantage of even elementary typography
not to speak of advanced technology. There has been persistent demand for
recognising Devanagari as an alternative script. Devanagari, in fact, has
been in use for writing Kashmiri for a long time now not only by Kashmiris
who had been forced to migrate from Kashmir, some young and upcoming Kashmiri
writers in the valley have also appeared on the scene. The demand for Nagri
script has met with stiff opposition from the fanatical elements among
the supporters of the Persio-Arabic script. Strangely, these very elements
pressed for and succeeded in getting Persio-Arabic script adopted as an
alternative script for Dogri and Punjabi in addition to officially accepted
Devanagari and Gurmukhi scripts respectively.
Kashmir has a continuous recorded history
of more than two thousand years. The great Kashmiri historians, Kalhan
and Ratnakar have written beautiful stories about Kashmir which apart from
their historical value are great pieces of Sanskrit literature. Lalitaditya
and Avantivarman have been among the famous kings of the Valley. When in
October, 1947, Pakistan invaded Jammu and Kashmir, its well-planned thrust
was on the Kashmir Valley. But Kashmir was saved from Pakistani marauders
by the gallantry of a handful Dogra troops led by legendary martyr, Brigadier
Rajendra Singh and the swift action of the Indian Army and Air Force. They
are real saviours of the Kashmir Valley and they are still the only guarantee
of its safety, which is under continuous attack from Pakistan.
It is thus clear that the erstwhile State
of Jammu and Kashmir was a house built by Maharaja Gulab Singh, the scion
of Dogra dynasty and remained intact hardly for one hundred years. The
unity of the house that Gulab Singh built, came to an end the moment Dogra
raj disappeared. The total area of J&K state is 2.22 lakh (222,000)
sq. kms. Of this, Pak-occupied area accounts for 78,114 sq. kms. China-occupied
area is 37,555 sq. kms and another 3,180 sq. kms. has been illegally gifted
by Pakistan to China. The area of the present state left free under India
is thus 1.01 lakh (101,000)sq. kms. Ladakh is the biggest division in area
with 49,146 sq. kms.; Jammu division occupies the second position with
26,293 sq. kms. and Kashmir Valley comes last with 15,948 sq. kms. It is
a wrong statement and a lie when some people say that Kashmiris have got
divided due to India-Pakistan conflict. The Kashmir Valley where Kashmiris
have been living for times immemorial, is intact. However, a small, about
ten kilometer wide area, Tithwal to Uri and Uri to Rajouri-Poonch is a
non-Kashmiri belt inhabited by Gujjars and Bakarwals. It is a buffer between
Punjabi speaking people of Pak- occupied areas and the Kashmir Valley.
People living in this belt do interact with each other on both sides of
the Line of Control (de facto border between India and Pakistan) as the
latter cuts across this belt. Area is mountainous and people are mostly sheperds. They live in make-shift mud hamlets an the slopes. Ever since
cease-fire was agreed upon in 1949, the Indian Army had been helping these
people to have contacts with each other. But when Pakistan sent armed infiltrators
in 1965, some restrictions had to be imposed on the free movement across
the line of control.
Of the three regions - Jammu, Ladakh and
the Kashmir Valley - which are in de facto and de jure control of India,
there is no problem about Jammu and Ladakh. These regions should have been
fully integrated with the rest of India by giving them the status of a
fill-fledged statehood to Jammu and Union Territory status to Ladakh, as
desired and demanded by the people of these two regions. As regards Kashmir
Valley, Muslims constitute overwhelming population there. A very serious
problem has arisen in the Valley. Under the Pakistani plan of religious
cleansing of the Valley, three lakh (300,000) Hindus have been driven out
from here. They are the original natives of the Valley. They have the primary
and valid claim over a part of the Valley where they may be resettled.
These Kashmiri Hindus have staked their claim to the East and North of
river Jhelum stretching from Jawahar Tunnel to Zoji La pass. They have
demanded this `homeland' to be given the Union Territory status with the
application of the Indian Constitution in full. All Kashmiris were Hindus.
A good number of them were converted to Islam by force by Muslim invaders
in the 14th century. Many foreign Muslims, Khurasanis and Afghans also
settled in the Valley. But that does not negate the fact that seven lakh
(700,000) Hindus who stuck to their original religion against all odds
and who preserved the Kashmiri's culture, language and way of life, through
the centuries of foreign rule and have primary claim to its soil irrespective
of being in minority. India and Pakistan have accepted the cease-fire line
between Indian part of J&K and Pakistan-occupied part of it, under
the Shimla agreement of 1972. The cease-fire line was given the name of
Line of Actual Control (LAC). Cease-fire line was demolished and LAC was
modified as a result of agreement between the Army heads of the two countries.
Kashmir ceased to be on the U.N. agenda and U.N. observers, who were watching
the cease-fire were withdrawn. Kashmir ceased to be an international issue
and became a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan. The two countries
agreed to solve the issue by mutual discussion and peacefully and in no
circumstances use force. The Shimla agreement was endorsed by the United
nations, the Indian parliament and the Pakistani National Assembly. It
is, therefore, too much to expect Pakistan to agree to part with the area,
which is under its firm control since 1948. Therefore, all talk of `new
concept', `unified Kashmir' or third alternative and the like is neither
realistic nor practicable. While presenting the Shimla agreement to the
Pakistani National Assembly for approval, Z.A.Bhutto (the then Pak President)
told the Assembly that the right of self-determination had been virtually
lost in 1948 when Pakistan accepted the U.N. resolution providing for withdrawal
of Pakistani troops from the area. under their control while India had
been required to withdraw only bulk of its forces. He reminded his countrymen
that in 1964 the U.N. had given a consensus, not a resolution on Kashmir
and in 1965 it had refused even to mention Kashmir by name speaking instead
of political problem underlying the conflict. Further, Bhutto said if the
U.N. had not been able to implement any of its resolutions how could people
expect it to solve the issue which had been on its agenda for 25 years.
It was after this speech that the Pakistani National Assembly ratified
the Shimla Agreement by an overwhelming majority.
The people of Jammu and Ladakh regions and
native Pandit population of Kashmir Valley cannot be deprived of the benefit
of principle of autonomy and democracy, which is considered sacrosanct
for the Muslims of the Valley.
There are two reasons why`Kashmir', `Kashmiri'
and `Kashmiriat' overshadowed every other thing in the State of Jammu &
Kashmir. One reason was the Abdullah factor. Sheikh Abdullah had an unsatiable
desire to carve out a Sheikhdom for himself and his dynasty. He got massive
support from the Communists to achieve this aim. Communists had a long-term
plan to turn Kashmir into another Outer Mongolia. Communists in those days
were working through the National Conference. The Communist leader, G.M.Sadiq,
who was also senior National Conference leader himself paid two visits
to lahore and Karachi to seek Jinnah's (the creator of Pakistan) endorsement
to independent Kashmir under the National Conference, led by Abdullah.
Jinnah flatly refused to go by this line and warned Sadiq that Abdullah
and his party must close their shop as they had no role. Jinnah expressed
confidence that Kashmir was in his pocket. Disenchanted with Jinnah, Communists
advised Abdullah to persuade India to agree to an independent Kashmir.
Pakistani invasions forced them to agree to some weak link with India.
This was due to sheer necessity of escaping from forced annexation by Pakistan.
The Communists who had opposed `Quit India'
(massive agitation led by Mahatma Gandhi in 1942 for the British to leave
India) movement fully supported and participated in the `Quit Kashmir'
movement. While
Quit India slogan was for British to quit and hand
over power to Indians, the absurdity and foolishness of Quit Kashmir
was quite patent. Maharaja Hari Singh was as much a native of the State
as Abdullah was. He should have been asked to abandon the throne and hand
over power to the people. But asking him to quit Kashmir was mysterious.
It only meant that he along with Dogra Hindus should leave Kashmir and
go to Jammu. Sheikh was wise enough to appreciate that his Sheikhdom could
be restricted to Kashmir only. As regards native Kashmiris known as Pandits,
he had already warned them in 1931 and given them three choices: Raliv,
Chaliv, or
Galliv: (Get converted to Islam; or leave the
State or get killed).
Sheikh's uncompromising demand was that
the Dogra Maharaja quit the terrain of the Valley for him and yet it was
the same Maharaja who had done tremendous work for development of Muslims.
Abdullah, who was better educated and well informed, never told his innocent
audience that their oppression and suppression was the result of uninterrupted
rule of Muslim tyrants for five centuries. He deliberately by-passed the
truth that the brief spell of Sikh and Dogra rule had resulted in ending
most of the economic atrocities, which had been inflicted on the Kashmiris
by pleasure seeking Pathan tribal rulers from Afghanistan.
After the circumstances made the Sheikh
overlord of not only Kashmir Valley but also of Jammu and Ladakh, he fully
utilised the opportunity to create Muslim hegemony, which he called Kashmiri
aspirations and psych. He treated Jammu and Ladakh as conquered colonies.
The communists, who had attracted to their cadres many intelligent young
persons, poets, writers, and artists, launched propaganda blitz throughout
the country about Kashmir's
identity and personality. The Cominform, the communist apex forum provided enormous funds to various
Associations, Societies, Councils and Fronts in India for the purpose.
Later on, when the Communists realised that Abdullah was in touch with
some American officials for carving an independent Kashmir under Western
hegemony, they became bitter opponents of the Sheikh. They gloated over
and publicly celebrated his dismissal in 1953. For Abdullah, Kashmir's
identity and aspirations meant Muslim identity and Islamic aspirations.
Like other states the only identity Kashmir could have was linguistic identity.
But Sheikh Abdullah killed the Kashmiri language when he declared Urdu
to be the official language of the State. Thus, he not only killed Kashmiri
language but along with it Dogri and Ladakhi
languages also. The propaganda has so stuck that
even today many political parties, intellectuals, media men talk of Kashmir's
identity. Every state in our Union and every region in our states has its
identity and the people have their psych. India is having unity in diversity.
It has been our great misfortune that our country has been a victim of
dynastic and monopolistic rule after independence. This has resulted in
frequent aberrations in the implementation of our Constitution. In spite
of the fact that the Constitution lays down well- defined procedures and
spheres of activities of both Central and State Governments, people in
many states had to resort to agitations on certain vital issues. But the
Sarkaria Commission has studied the whole problem and given its recommendations.
What is urgently required is the implementation of these recommendations.
Another reason for Kashmir's overshadowing
influence was Lord Mountbatten's commitment to Sir Winston Churchill that
he would protect the Muslim interests in India even after partition and
creation of Pakistan. This was evident in the way he pushed Jammu and Kashmir
into the arena of cold war and later left no stone unturned to try the
same in the case of the then princely State of Hyderabad. Had Sardar Patel
not taken over the affairs of the Hyderabad State along with other States
well in time, after Mountbatten's exit, Nehru- Mountbatten nexus would
have inflicted upon the nation a special Article in the Constitution ensuring
preservation of Hyderabad's identity. Even after Hyderabad's accession
to India, for which India had to send army there, Jawaharlal Nehru repeatedly
and persistently talked about preserving Hyderabad's identity, integrity
and psych. In substance, it meant the same thing as Muslim identity and
Islamic aspirations as in Kashmir. What constituted the State of Hyderabad?
It consisted of Telangana, Marathwada and Northern Karnataka which included
the districts of Raichur, Bidar and Gulbarga. Had not the States' reorganisation
Commission in 1956 strongly recommended the division of Hyderabad State,
we would have witnessed the Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao, Shivaji Patil, Speaker of the Lok Sabha (lower house of Indian Parliament) and
Virendra Patil ex-Chief Minister of Karnataka being called Hyderabadis
and asked to work for preservation of identity of Hyderabad. Had they not
done so they would have been labelled as communalists. SRC's recommendations
were so convincing and forceful that Nehru, though surprised and unhappy,
could do nothing to stall these recommendations.
The territorial analysis made here is not just
a geographical and physical phenomenon. In a restricted sense, the Himalayas
form the Northern mountain wall stretching from Ladakh, Kashmir, Jammu,
Himachal Pradesh, Uttaranchal, Sikkim, Assam, Arunachal, Naga Hills and Manipur. Poet Kalidasa has said in
Kumarsambhava:
Astyuttarsyam dishi devatma
himalayo nama nagadirajah
Poorvaparav toyanidhee vagahaiya
sthitah prithvya eva maandandah
(In the North of our country stands the lord of
mountains and very embodiment of divinity the Himalaya. Like a measuring
rod of the earth spanning the eastern and western oceans.)
Swami Vivekananda expounds this shloka (Sanskrit
verse) as follows:-
Important words in the verse are Devatma
(ensouled by divinity) and Manadanda (measuring rod). The poet implies
and suggests that the Himalaya is not a mere wall accidentally constructed
by nature. It is ensouled by divinity and is the protector of India and
her civilisation not only from the chill, icy blasts blowing from the Arctic
region but also from the deadly and destructive incursions of the invaders.
The Himalaya further protects India by sending great rivers such as Sindhu,
the Ganga and the Brahmaputra perennially fed by melting ice and irrespective
of the monsoon rains. Mandanda implies that the poet affirms that the Indian
civilisation is the best of all human civilisations, and forms the standard
by which all other human civilisations past, present and future must be
tested.
Ladakh, Kashmir and Jammu are in the extreme
North of the country and border China, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Muslim
Republics of erstwhile U.S.S.R.
Karakoram range lies in the North of the
Himalayas. The glaciers of Karakoram are some of the largest mountain glaciers
in the world. Siachen, the largest glacier is 70 kilometres long. Siachen
has assumed great significance because Pakistan has been trying its best
for the last several years to overcome this area. In the hostile confines
of this glacier, our troops are trained as much for countering the elements
of weather as for combating the Pakistanis across the frontier. In a region
that taxes both man and machine to the hilt, survival itself becomes a
challenge. The gruelling posting is considered a credible method of heightening
the patriotism of our forces. Those who serve in Siachen develop a certain
pride of having participated in the most distinctive disposition of troops
deployment in the world. Nowhere in the world are troops deployed at such
great heights and such a difficult tract. Acclimitisation is induced through
week-long road journey from Pathankot to Leh and onward to the Siachen
base camp, the trek involving the crossing of three mountain ranges. Another
accesss to Leh is from Pathankot via Manali, Patsio, Sarchu, Upshi and
Karu in the Kangra Valley. Both these roadways are open a mere four to
five months during the summer time, remaining snow-bound for the rest of
the year. Thus, there is a terrific urgency and hurry to rush over adequate
stocks of and ammunition every summer. The mode of air transport is basically
from Chandigarh to Leh or from Chandigarh to Thoise by helicopters or airdropping
from fixed wing aircraft. In the onward trek, one finds that the ground
underneath is shifting and breaking into clods of ice as each step is taken.
On the right side is the trickle of a river and beyond that massive peaks
rising vertically to twenty thousand feet and which cannot be seen unless
one takes the load off one's back to be able to look up. One trudges on sombrely, concentrating on the footprints of the man ahead, as a wrong
step would invite a descent into a crevasse and eternity. The coloured
pennants have the effect of a puff of oxygen. One takes a deeper breath,
gives an upward jerk to the rucksack, moves the goggles up the forehead
and willingly increases the steps to keep pace with the lead soldier. Then
when one least expects it, on a turn of the ripped path, the column suddenly
stops and down there are the flags and that small abode of stone and mud
structure. Memories of pain, successes, failures and of friends who perished
come flooding in, with tears and gratitude to the Divine Master. The loads
are off the back, weapons are neatly stacked. Each man gets up, chooses
a right-sized stone and places it on the wall that shields his group from
glacial winds. The fluttering pennants and the glacier provide the only
sound in that primeval scene as the soldiers lift up their rucksacks and
weapons. The troops are accommodated in fibre glass huts and dug-in-bunkers
or snow huts carved into frozen cliffsides. Water is a major problem -
it has to be melted out of snow over kerosene stoves and used before it
is deep freezed again by winter temperatures of -25 to -40 degrees Celsius
or summer temperatures of -5 to -20 degrees Celsius. While a daily wash
is well-nigh impossible in these frigid heights, there are occasions when
jawans feel like having a brisk-scrub. Initially burns sustained through
negligent contact with lighted stoves and hot kerosene is rather frequent.
Since water is scarce, one of the many methods the troops have evolved
to conserve it is to abstain from shaving. consequently, all our forward
troops in this region bristles and very often it is difficult to make one
out from other.
In these forbidden conditions, even a mundane
chore like answering the call of nature becomes lethal. Probably, this
is the only activity which draws the jawans out of their quarters for as
little as five minutes a day. But often they are forced to flee on account
of the snipper fire from Pakistani pickets across the Line of Control.
One big problem is how to dispose off the human waste. Chemical treatment
is used in Antarctica, but there the team strength is smaller and more
manageable. Biodegradation is also out of question as Siachen is far too
cold for microorganisms to be effective. Incineration by kerosene or petrol
is also possible but these resources are needed for their more conventional
uses. However, we are sure our scientists will soon be able to evolve viable
alternatives. Government is reported to have decided to reduce the number
of regular infantry troops and replace them with newly-raised units of
Ladakh Scouts. This is a welcome decision. It will save on acclimitisation
process. Ladakhis are better prepared to face the elements. Acclimitisation
is far easier for them. Frequent rotations can also be avoided. Traffic
to and from the posts, which is causing serious problems at present, will
be comparatively easy.
The strategic areas in the Northern parts
of Ladakh are Valleys of Nubra and the Shyok. There is another area called
Lingtzi Tang south of Depsang. Here in these high cold plains, the last
spurs of the Karakoram gradually subside. In between them are the shallow
Valley of Chip Chap, Galwan and Chang Chin Mo, all falling under Shyok.
There are numerous lakes scattered here. They contain much salt and soda
deposits. Another portion of this region is also called Aksai Chin. A caravan
route follows Nubra and Shyok to pass over to Sinkiang over the Karakoram
Pass, which is the highest pass in the world. Between the Shyok and the Sindhu, there is the range of
Kailash, which extends into Tibet where the
famous dome-shaped Mount Kailash, the abode of Shiva is situated, north
of Lake Mansarowar. Along the Sindhu runs the Ladakh range. South of Zaskar
is the great Himalayan Range, which in a mighty curve goes into the South-East
into Himachal Pradesh. On it there are number of important passes across
it, namely, Burzil, Zoji La, the latter leads from Kashmir Valley to Leh
and Bara Lacha La and again leads to Leh from Lahoul in Himachal Pradesh.
South of Central Himalayan Range is the Pir Panchal Range. Inside this
Range is the Valley of Kashmir. The Range merges with the Himalayas near
Deo Tibba in Himachal Pradesh. It touches the high Valley of Lahoul, which
is drained by the rivers Chandra and Bhaga, which join to make up the river
Chandrabhaga or Chenab. Rohtang Pass cuts Pir Panchal. In Jammu and Kashmir
there are at least ten parallel ranges as follows:-
-
The Aghil
-
The Karakoram
-
The Kailash
-
The Ladakh
-
The Zeskar
-
The Great Himalayas
-
The Pir Panchal
-
Dhaula Dhar
-
The Lesser Himalayas and
-
The Shivalik
Ladakh's strategic importance for the country is
paramount. But for the last 45 years, governments have concentrated on
pampering the minisicule Valley of Kashmir. The nation at large appears
not only unaware but apathetic to the sacrifices being made by the personnel
of our armed forces, Indo-Tibetan Border Force and last but not the least
the Border Roads Organisation. The 85 km. snow covered stretch of the Srinagar-Leh
highway from Gund to Drass in Kargil is dotted with memorials of the brave
BRO men and officers, who were buried alive under the avalanches during
snow clearance operations undertaken every year to keep the major road
link between Ladakh region and rest of the state open. The BRO has to launch
snow-clearing operations every year atop Zojila - one of the world's highest
roads bearing about 56 major avalanches. Zojila experiences the heaviest
snowfall in the region. Our intellectuals never find any time to
study the problems of this region. Their vision gets blocked in the Kashmir
Valley particularly the city of Srinagar where they find wazawan
too delicious to think of anything else.
The obscurantist policy of the Indian Government
in regard to kashmir has endangered the security and defence of our country.
Looking at the Islamic crescent from East to West, it is clear that the
fundamentalist zealots are attempting to create a nucleus of an Islamic
block extending from China to Turkey and Morocco to Malaysia. Iran's megalomaniac
ambition to spread its fanatic philosophy is a major threat. Kashmir is
very important to them for this axis. Even without taking into account
Islamic axis threat, the real threat exists on account of Pakistan-China
border link. Pakistan-China alliance is overlooking the entire northern
frontier of India. Mr. James Clad, a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment
for International Peace has stated following his discussions with senior
officials in New Delhi that the Indian Government was under tremendous
pressure to cede further territory in Kashmir, so that Pakistan and China
could feel secure about the road linking the two countries. India is in
occupation of Saltoro Ridge of The Siachen Glacier and Pakistan forces
are only a little distance away facing them. In the Siachen area the demarcation
of the Line of Control ends abruptly at Point NJ9482. India's position
is that the line must be extrapolated North to Siachen glacier, which is
located in the Karakoram range to the North-West of Nubra Valley. Pakistan's
contention is that the line should extent to North-West of Karakoram Pass.
This will enable Pakistan to link up with the Chinese forces who are at
the Karakoram Pass.
There are reports from China emanating from
official sources that China is setting up direct air links from Beijing
and Hong Kong to Lhasa and other Tibetan towns. This daring reform was
aimed at ending ethnic separatism and seems to be intended to accelerate
the transfer of Chinese settlers to Tibet and drown recalcitrant Tibetans
in a sea of Chinese. It is estimated that Chinese settlers already
out-number Tibetans by 1.5 million in the regions of Amdo, Kham and Uitang
taken together. Under the covering policy of opening Tibet to foreign investment,
hordes of Chinese themselves will swarm Tibet and convert it into a real
province of China. China is exporting M-9 and M-11 tactical technology
to Pakistan. She is contemplating formal transfer of weapons as well as
sale of systems engineering and production information to Pakistan. China
is not a member of Missile Transfer Control Regime (MTCR) which prohibits
such exports. Although informally she has agreed to adhere to these restrictions
but there are indications that ultimately she will affect the transfer
of these missiles as well as nuclear missiles to Pakistan. Pentagon may
perform the post-mortem subsequently but finally the U.S. will also acquiesce.In
fact, China is currently engaged in arms build-up and acquisition of advanced
technology to further its aim of regional dominance and power projection
that may change the balance of power in the region. China has also purchased
heavy transport aircraft MI-17 (Hip) helicopters and air to air refuelling
capabilities. China has also recently bought 26 SU-27 Flankers.
She has also made other military purchases with the aim of changing the
balance of power in the region. While immediate goal of China is arms build-up
but the underlying aim is to gain expertise to develop her own arms.
Both China and Pakistan have become beneficiaries
from the break-up of the Soviet Union. The old Red Army's machine guns,
rockets, tanks and jets and other weapons are being stolen and sold by
the officers and men to whosoever may pay them cash. AK-47 assault rifles
and spare parts for vehicles are openly available and shipped to all sides
through Serbia. In the Caucasus, one of the largest military districts
of the former Soviet Union, there have been innumerable thefts and weapon
sales. An entire ammunition depot was stolen and resold. Russia's defence
Ministry reported hundreds of thefts from its arsenals during the year
1992. In early 1993, a quasi-private firm in Kharkov, Ukrain, advertised
millions of dollars worth of planes, tanks, submarines and rockets. China
and Pakistan due to geographical contiguity have laid their hands on bulk
of these arms and equipment. China and Pakistan are having close military
collaboration. With active Chinese assistance, Pakistan is developing four
ballistic missiles with a maximum range of 600 km. The Brazilian SS-300
missiles' design has influenced them. The Chinese M-11 Project, which in
turn assisted Pakistan's HATF-2 intermediate range missile programme with
a range of 300 km and a 500 kg warhead. China is aiding Pakistan in intermediate
range missile programme HATF-3 which has a range of 600 km. When Pakistan
was active member of Western military bloc against China, the latter had
developed deep friendship with Pakistan. China was convinced that Pakistan's
anti-China stance was only for getting arms from U.S. and in reality it
only wanted to destroy India. It was during India-China honeymoon that
the Beijing-Islamabad highway was built through Karakoram which now hangs
like Damocles sword on India's head.
China has developed good working relationship
with Western countries mainly via its strong relationship with the U.S.,
the Jewish lobby and Israel. Israel is being used as a conduit to supply
Western weapons to China. With the help of the West, particularly the U.S.,
(via Israel), China for the first time has been able to deploy short range
missiles tipped with nuclear bombs in Tibet. She is also working towards
manufacture of long-range missiles. After the Sumdong Chu episode in 1986-87
and exposure of its military weakness after its dismal performance against
Vietnam in 1979, China is taking all possible steps to become a major super
power in the world. Actually, China is preparing an arms spending spree
to turn itself into a military giant, with a previously weak navy being
beefed up to operate beyond her own coastal waters. The airforce is also
set to benefit through the import of highly modern fighting planes from
the former Soviet Union. An aircraft carrier is also planned to be put
on stream, which would boost the power of air force by giving it a sea
base. China is also working on acquiring cruise missiles. She wants to
fill the maritime vacuum left by the dissolved Soviet Union on one hand
and the withdrawal of U.S. 7th Fleet from Philippines on the other. Mr.Yang
Shangkun, Chinese head of State, while addressing the military, told them
that "enemy forces in the international arena could burn their fingers
over China if they do not behave well". An article in the army paper
Yiefangyunbao spoke of a strengthened army being "like a tiger
with wings and cannot be defeated by any enemy". After the Gulf War
in 1991, the Chinese leadership concluded that the most modern technology
available should be imported and developed to catch up in areas where they
were lagging behind. Beijing is also interested in snapping up MIG-31 planes,
as well as rocket ground defence with radar systems. She is also reported
to have received Patriot defence technology from Israel, while Iran apparently
delivered technology acquired from the U.S. on refuelling in mid-air. China
entices Russian arms and nuclear experts with cash offers to do business
and the Russian President spoke on a visit to Beijing of good prospects
for further weapons deliveries to China. China which until recently was
not a sea power of any significance and which could cover only its coasts
has now set in that field also, developing new frigates and destroyers
armed with rockets. China is planning to develop three large marine bases.
She has also built up island of Hainam near the Spartly Islands. China
wants to control international shipping routes in the region. It is also
the sole nuclear power in the region. China is aggressively wooing Myanmar
and has been granted a base by the Yangon regime in the Bay of Bengal.
It could be a great contribution to mankind
if India, Pakistan and China could live as friendly neighbours and develop
a similar kind of relationship that countries of Europe have with each
other. This can only be achieved if India maintains a military capacity
so as to take on both China and Pakistan at the same time. The West uses
our inconsequential neighbour, Pakistan as a bait to neutralise India and
also push it to sign the N.P.T. so as to make India an impotent country.
India must maintain a well-prepared supply of nuclear weapons at all costs.
A couple of thermodynamic explosions appear advisable to make China and
Western sponsors of Pakistan more friendly to us. India should not remain
in-waiting for a catastrophe. In 1962, it was our humiliation but now it
will be our destruction.
Part of the military headquarters for southwestern
China is to be shifted to Tibet. A construction project 10 kms. south west
of Lhasa has become the new headquarters for the Tibet military district,
which was earlier based near Chengdu, capital of Sichuan province, 1300 kms. to the east. The size of the headquarters stretching for more than
a kilometre in length suggests that part of China's south western command
headquarters - the Chengdu military region - may also be moving to Lhasa.
The new site along the road to Gongkar airport consists of about 40, three
storeyed buildings each containing about 40 rooms, suggesting it will house
upto 15000 men. The new site will not be devoted only to barracks and weaponry
facilities, several of which are already stationed around Lhasa, but to
the command and administration structure. China has already developed a
rapid deployment system to move soldiers into Tibet from inland Chinese
provinces at great speed. The military construction outside Lhasa is part
of a wave of civilian and military development activity apparently, designed
to cater to thousands of Chinese migrants seeking new opportunities in
the region. In order to facilitate the new developments, Chinese officials
had replaced local Tibetan administrators in some rural areas. China is
reported using Tibet as a dumping ground for nuclear and chemical waste
endangering the ecology of the Himalayas from where the rain-water washes
over India and from where major rivers of India begin.
In this context the strain on Indian defence
positions in the Siachen Glacier complex has increased manifold. Pakistan
has already ceded to China the Sahaksgram Valley. This area dominates the
Shyok river approach connected to Pakistani Khapalu Garrison. It has become
increasingly difficult for India to vacate the glacier and expose the northern
area of sub-sector West to future Khapalu and Dansum threats. Ladakh Scouts
are confronting Chinese border guards in northern Indira Col-Siachen Complex.
Indian troops in this sector are wedged between Pakistan and China. Contrary
to the declared policy of the United States, military links between her
and Pakistan are continuing. A 63 member U.S. Army Rangers Team held in
March, 1993, a joint military exercise with the Pakistan Army commandos
of the Special Service Group (SSG) at Peshawar. The exercise was ostensibly
dedicated to mastering high altitude warfare techniques. The S.S.G. has
developed an expertise in high altitude warfare and is most regularly developed
in the Siachen theatre. Coupled with the U.S. interest in understanding
the dynamics of high altitude warfare is the S.S.G.'s need to fully grasp
the deployment parameters for a special operations force in terrains like
Siachen. With S.S.G.'s critical role in Siachen, the possibility also exists
of a fall-out in operations there. Unlike India, which is conservative
in using its special forces, Pakistan has consistently used the S.S.G.
as a spearhead. India has to always keep reality into consideration. China's
military capabilities are increasing. Sino-Pak strategic links are strengthening.
Our Army's internal security responsibilities are also on the rise. Therefore,
even a thought should never arise for shrinking of assets within formations.
The man- power reduction process which began in late 1989 must be abandoned.
The imbalance between recruitment and retirement must be corrected. Washington,
Bonn, Paris and Tokyo, who are pressing for cut in India's defence expenditure,
must be convincingly apprised of India's defence requirements. China has
a standing army of three million men.
India is the only major country that is
faced with genuine security threats. She needs nuclear option to constraint
both Pakistan and China. India has to develop nuclear weapons and Agni
missile to deter China in Tibet. India has been marginalised in the global
order while its great neighbour China has been able to create a visibility,
because of its belligerence backed by military power. Pakistan seems to
have persuaded many Americans that Kashmir is the core issue between
India and Pakistan and is connected to the nuclear issue. With the growth
of its nuclear capability, Pakistan concurrently raised the level of tension
and after nearly three decades raked up the Kashmir issue by waging a proxy
war. Pakistan has been able to influence America to link her nuclear proliferation
as an India-Pakistan problem. Pakistan's military bureaucratic complex,
which largely controls her power structure, has succeeded not only in acquiring
legitimacy for its nuclear bomb, but also made it credible. The U.S., which
kept one eye closed when Pakistan was pursuing its clandestine weapon programme,
seems to have reconciled to a nuclear-armed Pakistan, noise about Pressler
ammendment not withstanding. One way to deprive Pakistan of the nuclear
bomb is the Israel way, destroying Pak nuclear weapon facilities by bombing.
The other and the only possible way is to have a double deterrent. Pakistan
has been suggesting to have a nuclear weapon-free zone in South Asia. The
SARC countries are also supporting it. America has been pressing India
to sign N.P.T. Pakistan has also made India's signing the N.P.T. as a condition
for doing so. Thus, India is presented as villain of the piece. India's
dilemma is not understood and cannot be understood by the West and other
advanced countries like japan. India has to confront a treacherous Pakistan.
The very mention of this may be considered ridiculous. But hard experience
has taught this to India. In early 1948, Pakistan firmly denied in the
U.N. Security Council its Army being involved in the war in Jammu and Kashmir.
But when the U.N. Commission was about to visit the situation on spot,
Pakistan unashamedly officially informed the U.N. Security Council that
her army had been fighting the war with India in Kashmir. In 1965, Pakistan
sent its Army personnel in disguise and called them
Mujahidden and
later openly pushed its army into Kashmir, violated its ceasefire line
and international border in Chhamb on 1st September, 1965 and simultaneously
denied any involvement . Its propaganda was so fierce that even the British
Prime Minister, Harold Wilson blamed India for violating the international
border in the Lahore sector while Pakistan had already done it six days
before. But ultimately truth prevailed and Wilson regretted his statement
and felt sorry for spoken a lie. Wilson confessed that he had been wrongly
briefed by his Commonwealth office. Later Lt. Gen. R.H.Nimu of Australia,
Chief of U.N. Observer Group in Jammu and Kashmir sent his report to the
U.N. Security Council blaming Pakistan for violating the cease-fire line.
But all this happened after tremendous harm had been done to India's interests.
No harm was caused to Pakistan for speaking lies. Even earlier in 1948,
Sir Owen Dixon, a jurist of international repute was sent by U.N. Security
Council to the sub- continent with wide powers to bring about peace between
India and Pakistan. This is what he said in his report:
"Without going into causes or reasons
why it happened, which presumably formed part of the history of the sub-continent,
I was prepared to adopt the view that when the frontier state of Jammu
and Kashmir was crossed on, I believe October 20, 1947 by hostile elements,
it was contrary to international law and when in May, 1948 as I believe,
units of regular Pakistani forces moved into the territory of the State,
that too was inconsistent with international law".
Did violation of international law on three
occasions affect Pakistan in any way? Not at all. On the first two instances,
Pakistan was made a party to the Kashmir case instead of being named as
aggressor. Suppose Pakistan violates the treaty and uses nuclear weapons
against India, Indians will die, what harm comes to Pakistan? Will the
world countries join India to find out what Pakistan was having or doing
inside its territory? It were America's nuclear teeth which made the United
Nations Organisation to rally round her to find out what was happening
inside Iraq. Desperation can result in anything. Did not Iraq indulge in
chemical warfare against Iran? Thousands of people got killed. Have they
been revived? In their weaker moments, Americans also used napalm bombs
in Vietnam and that also on civil population. It is naive and futile to
think that Pakistan will abide by any agreement if it is required to save
its Islamic pride when defeated in future war. The U.S.-Pakistan arms treaty
signed in mid fifties, under which Pakistan got massive U.S. arms free
of cost, contained a specific clause that those arms will be used only
against Communist China and in no case against India. But Pakistan used
these arms openly and freely against India during India-Pakistan conflict
of 1965. When the U.S. government protested, Pakistani President Gen. Ayub
Khan bluntly and publicly announced that Pakistanis were not bloody fools
to keep these arms in cotton slabs while she was fighting a war with India.
What was the U.S. reaction? Supply of more and more arms and massive spare
parts for earlier ones. Fate of N.P.T. or South Asia Nuclear Free Zone
Treaty cannot be different. Fanaticism and frustration will not allow Pakistan to see the futility and danger of using the bomb. The only deterrent can
be for India to have ten for Pakistan's one and let Pakistan know that
India will retaliate. It should not be difficult for Pakistan to understand
that any nuclear confrontation between India and Pakistan may result in
partial and sporadic harm to India, it will mean doom and total destruction
of Pakistan. Has not North Korea repudiated N.P.T.? In regard to possession
of nuclear arsenal by India, a retired General has rightly said: Prepare
or perish. Some experts are of the view that the nuclear issue is only
and India-Pakistan problem and China's being a nuclear power need not concern
India. They contend that China's nuclear might and nuclear proliferation
consequent to Soviet disintegration are no threats to India. According
to them China has attained its objective when it acquired Indian territory
in the 1962 war and it has no ambition left now vis-a-vis India. This is
a mere illusion. When China annexed Tibet in 1950, the same opinion was
held by India's Neroes at that time. They preached us that China wanted
that much and no more and shouted Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai (Indians and Chinese
are brothers). India and China signed the Freindship Treaty in 1954. But
what was the result? China launched an invasion on India in 1962. India
was defeated, humiliated and lost strategic territory. Had not United States
of America, U.K., Canada, West Germany and Australia responded generously
to Nehru's pathetic appeal, China would never have announced unilateral
cease-fire. The spectre of friendship and enmity is not permanent. Interests
of nations go on changing. India's security concerns transcend Pakistan
and extend to China and beyond. Policy makers in the U.S. should appreciate
that twisting India's arms will be harmful for all. India's legitimate
threat perceptions are not confined to the sub-continent.
We should not forget that when in 1965,
we had to face Pakistani aggression, China gave us 72 hour ultimatum in
support of Pakistan. Kashmir outside India or its weak links with India
would enable China to take over the entire Ladakh region and make the Kashmir
Valley its base for penetrating into India as deep as Madhya Pradesh and
Maharashtra, to keep Indian troops tied up in Himachal Pradesh and Garhwal
and Kumaon Hills in U.P. and then cut off North Bengal, Assam and the entire
North-East. The enemy will get tactical and behind the lines support from
various terrorist outfits, which have already been sponsored in various
border States. This is not a mere imagination but a real possibility and
is based on our experiences in 1962 and 1965. How can we forget that at
the height of China's offensive in November, 1962, India's Prime Minister,
Jawaharlal Nehru, virtually abandoned Assam when he spoke over All India
Radio. It is a sad fact that there is a marked apathy in many parts of
the country about the looming disaster. Our history is full of instances
when historic battles were being fought in one part of the country, people
in other parts stood aloof, thinking that they were far away and safe.
What happened? The entire country was enslaved for many centuries. And
we were able to free ourselves only after we agreed to cutting our two
limbs and creating two Islamic countries both on the East and West. Lakhs
among us were massacred, abducted and raped, houses destroyed and belongings
looted. Millions of people were forced to abandon their hearths and homes
and turn refugees.
Kashmir Valley is the base for the defence
of this entire northern region of this country. Therefore the country must
seriously think how to deal with our
progressives and intellectuals
who feel great pleasure in propounding the absurd theory of a third alternative
in Kashmir by handing it over to the same elements, who have been raping
it in the past. The first act of the desperadoes used to be to demand from
Kashmiris Zar biddam; Zan Biddam. (Give us money give us
women). However, adequate realisation has begun to dawn on the Western
powers in regard to importance of Kashmir to India's nationhood and to
its very existence as an independent sovereign country. The British Parliamentary
Under Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, Mr.Mark
Lennox-Boyd condemned militant violence in Jammu and Kashmir and voiced
support for India's efforts to deal with the terrorist threat. Mr.Lennox-Boyd
spoke in the House of Commons on 20th February, 1992 after the question
was raised in a debate by Mr.Terry Rooney a newly elected M.P. from Brandford
North - a constituency populated by a large number of Mirpuri Muslims calling
themselves Kashmiris. Mr.Lennox-Boyd briefly outlining the history of Kashmir,
said, much has happened since India and Pakistan originally agreed
to a plebescite covering the entire princely State as set out in the U.N.
resolutions in the late 1940s, and 1950s. The issue then was whether
Kashmir should accede to India or to Pakistan, not independence, he
said in his reply to Mr.Rooney's question. Mr.Lennox-Boyd said that since
then India and Pakistan had reached a fresh agreement in 1972 pledging
to settle differences peacefully and bilaterally and committing themselves
to a final settlement of the issue.
so, the earlier agreement was superceded
by the 1972 agreement, he said. The Minister said Britain had consistently
condemned those who resort to terrorist tactics for political ends. The
bomb and the bullet are no substitute for the ballot box.
"We support
the Government of India in their efforts to deal with the challenge from
terrorist violence in Kashmir."
Mr.Robert Toricelli, a member of the House
Foreign Affairs Committee and also of the House Sub Committee on Asian
and Pacific Affairs in the U.S. Government, speaking about Kashmir in February
1993 said, "The United States fought a deadly civil war that killed
hundreds of our people for the single proposition that this Union would
stand and that no one has the right to divide it. The people of India have
the same right."
In this wide world everybody is free to
discuss anything or hold any views. This applies particularly to the people
in the West. But in our country some people take a very casual view and
think aloud about the future of Kashmir. They care two hoots for the country's
law and the Constitution. The United States Institute of Peace (USIP) is
an autonomous organisation set up by the Act of U.S. Congress and is part
of Federal Government. There is hardly a thinktank in the U.S. that does
not have a CIA smell in it. The Carnegie Institute as also the East-West
Centre at Honolulu are also suspected to be like that. It is very difficult
if not impossible to confirm such accusations. In early seventies, Dr.Shankar
Dayal Sharma, the then President of Indian National Congress used to make
such charges very often with full sense of responsibility. Mrs.Indira Gandhi
had set up a Commission if Inquiry headed by Justice P.D.Kudal of Rajasthan
High Court to investigate the
wrong doings in the Gandhi Peace Foundation.
Justice Kudal, after several year's labour submitted his report and indicted
the Foundation on several counts, among them charges of spying, of harbouring
anti-national militants with allegations of corruption and of waging
bacterial
warfare against the country. In mid-January, 1993, USIP held a four
day discussion on Kashmir in Washington, D.C. The convenor of the meeting
was Robert Oaklay, former U.S. Ambassador to Pakistan. Discussions were
conducted by Ambassador Sam Lewis, who heads the State Department's Policy
Planning Council. Seven Americans, eight Pakistanis and seven Indians took
part. What they discussed is irrelevant so far as India is concerned. India's
Prime Minister, P.V.Narasimha Rao was not barking as Bhutto's proverbial
Indian dog when he said from the ramparts of the Red Fort on 15th August,
1992 that Kashmir was an integral part of India and said that this was
the bottom line so far as India is concerned. From the American side there
was, among others, James Clad, who has figured increasingly in recent going-on
about Kashmir. He happens to be fellow of another think-tank, Carnegie
Institute for International Peace. There was another man from East-West Centre, Honolulu. Why is
C.I.A. interested in Kashmir or rather in taking
Kashmir away from India and setting it up as an independent State of its
own? Carnegie did a study in India during 1992, which received a great
deal of publicity in the U.S. The Carnegie Endowment Study group has presented
another report titled India and America, the cold war. In this report
it has been suggested that India unilaterally withdraw from Siachen as
a stimulus to broader dialogue on confidence building measures. It has
also been suggested that both India and Pakistan cut one armoured division,
which may lead to force reduction and deployments. The Study Group's recommendation
that Indian troops withdraw unilaterally from Siachen overlooks the history
of Kashmir theatre, which is that Pakistan has always sought to fill any
vacuum. Had India not pre-empted the Siachen forward movement in 1984,
Pakistan may well have occupied the glacier. While India would welcome
confidence-building steps for reducing border tension, Pakistan has repeatedly
violated them. Parity between India and Pakistan seems to have become a
dogma with the Americans. And like all dogmas this one too flies in the
face of reality and clouds one's vision.
In a large country like India there are
always some sections asking for one thing or other. And none can prevent
any person or group or even governments of other countries from doing what
they might like to do. After getting fully disillusioned with the going-on
in the U.N. Security Council about Kashmir, Jawaharlal Nehru was once constrained
to call its functioning as international gangsterism. Some media persons
and others have made it a habit to malign the country's security forces
who are facing foreign sponsored insurgency in Kashmir. Those who do not
learn from history are condemned to repeat it. Whenever the Government
of India, takes a step forward in regard to Kashmir, it immediately takes
two steps backward. It now seems determined to further mess up things in
Kashmir. It has brought back to the helm of affairs the very people whose
ineptitude had virtually resulted in handing over the State to Pakistan
inspired secessionists before Mr.Jagmohan set his shoulder in salvaging
the situation in January, 1990. If Farooq Abdullah's tenure as Chief Minister
was an unmitigated disaster for the State, Mr.K.V.Krishna Rao had done
nothing to show that he can cope with the kind of situation that now prevails
in the Kashmir Valley. It appears that the environment in which Mr.Krishna
Rao will have to work has been pre-determined by Pilot-Farooq combine.
To hound Mr.G.C.Saxena and bring back to power the very people who had
brought disaster to the Valley, amounts to a cavalier gamble with the future
of Kashmir, which deserves severe condemnation. It will be too much to
believe that the Centre does not know of all this. The only rational explanation
for its launching itself on a palpably disastrous course can be that Mr.Rajesh
Pilot, the junior but high profile Minister of State for Home Affairs,
who has been constantly meddling in Kashmir affairs, has had it orchestrated
to add a feather to his deceptive political turban which he puts at prime
occasions. Equally deplorable is the conduct of other Ministers, particularly
the Prime Minister, Mr.P.V. Narasimha Rao, who have gone along with him.
This new Rajesh Pilot-Farooq Abdullah accord has, among other serious fall-outs,
plunged into a state of uncertainty the trans-Himalayan territory of ladakh.
Government's approach to Kashmir problem is marked by total immaturity,
tactlessness and recklessness. What Jammu and Kashmir needs today is political
reorganisation especially in the Valley. No political process is possible
unless the fundamental necessity of making the writ of law run and of a
political reorganisation of the State is undertaken keeping in mind the
political aspirations of all the three regions of the State and the religious
minority of the kashmir Valley. After the writ of the government is accepted
and the gun politics is crushed, the first priority is to enable the minority
community of Kashmir to return and live in their homes which were theirs
for millennia. It has been Kashmir's misfortune that everytime the situation
showed promise of improving under a particular policy and style of functioning,
the Central Government promptly put the brakes on, removed the crucial
personnel and replaced them by a soft outfit and thus gave the terrorists
all the time and encouragement to regroup and launch fresh and deadly assault.
There can be no beginning of any kind of political process till the proxy
war unleashed by Pakistan in the Valley is won decisively and normalcy
is restored. For the last 45 years India has been banking on others. First
it went to the U.N., leaned on the U.S.S.R. and now finally hopes that
U.S. would declare Pak as a terrorist state. The U.S. will not oblige.
It is a curse for our nation that we are
being forced to carry over our shoulders the remnants of some families
which have caused tremendous harm to the country. Look at that balloon,
Farooq Abdullah. In an interview to the BBC on 12th March, 1993, he has
said: "Restoration of pre-1953 status with irrevocable guarantee against
any erosion could be a starting point in resolving the 45-year Kashmir
crisis". He has added that a dialogue with Pakistan at the same time
was necessary. According to him there should be no hesitation in involving
mutually friendly countries like America, Britain and Russia with the Kashmiris
as an essential party to any talk on the issue. The major thrust of Abdullah's
interview was that the pre-1953 status should be restored to Jammu and
Kashmir with "Delhi keeping only defence, foreign affairs and communication
with it. The rest of the affairs should be allowed to be handled independently
by the Kashmir Government." On the fulfillment of these conditions,
he said he would return to Kashmir politics. On the day Farooq made the
above statement to woo the terrorists, the latter removed the last sign
of his existence in the Valley. He was dismissed from the Auqaf Trust which
has an annual budget of nearly Rs. 3 crores. It is great misfortune of
our country that a brief chameleon like Farooq Abdullah is considered a
political leader. The hi-fi man, Rajesh Pilot has executed the whole drama.
In his crusade and unrelenting bid to move central stage, this man whose
megalomania is now well known, has been delegated such Powers as will further
enhance his aforesaid trait. Perhaps Mr.Narasimha Rao does not know where
this person, demonstrating his absolute faith in Mr.Rao, will one day land
him and the nation. The murder of cardiac surgeon and one of the pioneers
of subversion and terrorism, Dr.Abdul Ahad Gooru on 1st April, 1993 by
one of the terrorist outfits, has blown to smithereens the unrestrained
fervour of Rajesh Pilot. The terrorists' designs behind this murder conforms
to a pattern. Earlier, prominent Human Rights leader, Hriday Nath Wanchoo
was brutally murdered. Mr.Gooru's murder is the latest instance of how
overground leaders have been dumped to death by terrorists after making
use of them. Mr.Rajesh Pilot and those who share his views seem to think
if they close their eyes, the whole world becomes dark. They must abandon
their cosy assumption at once.
Some people keep their eyes closed and concentrate
their mind on fixed points. And what is worse they think that they have
the monopoly of all the wisdom in the world. According to them, Jammu and
Kashmir is still governed by the Constitutional Order promulgated by Maharaja
Hari Singh in the year 1939. According to these intellectuals Jammu and
Kashmir acceded to India in three subjects only, viz.Defence, Foreign Affairs
and Communications. This issue was raised by some other people also in
the early fifties. Therefore, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, the Prime Minister
of India made an official announcement in Parliament of India on 7th August,
1952, He said:
"There still seems to be a good deal of misunderstanding
about Kashmir's accession to India. The other day I said in this House
that this accession was complete in law and in fact in October, 1947. It
is patent and no argument is required because accession of every State
in India was complete on these very terms by September in that year or
a little later. All the States acceded in three basic subjects, namely
Defence, Foreign Affairs and Communications. Can anybody say that accession
of any State in India was incomplete simply because they acceded in only
these three subjects? Of course, not. It was a complete accession in law
and in fact. When United Nations Commission accompanied by legal advisors
and others came here, it was open to them to challenge it. But they did
not because it was quite clear to them and to their legal advisors that
there could be no question about the legal validity of the accession."
In his autobiography Atish-e-Chinar,
Sheikh Abdullah has said:
"The Instrument of Accession signed by
Hari Singh was the same as those signed by the rulers of other Princely
states. According to it, once accepted, accession was full, final unconditional
and irrevocable."
These designated intellectives take
shelter under Article 370 of the Constitution of India. They refuse to
listen when they are told that this Article is purely temporary and provisional
and should have disappeared by now. In February 1964, Pandit Nehru had
assured the Lok Sabha that Article 370 would get eroded in due course and
vanish ultimately. Mr.M.C. Chagla who was Education Minister in Pandit
Nehru's cabinet at that time and who had represented India in many Security
Council debates on Kashmir said in the Rajya Sabha in the tone of exasperation:
"The Prime Minister the other day spoke
of the gradual erosion of Article 370 of the Constitution. I hope that
this erosion is accelerated and I also hope that very soon that Article
will disappear from the Constitution of India. After all, it is transitional
and temporary. I think transitional period has been long enough."
Sri Chagla had been Chief Justice of Bombay
High Court and was jurist of international repute. He was Education Minister
of India and later India's Foreign Minister. His speeches in the U.N. Security
Council on Kashmir are treasures of law, constitution and jurisprudence.
He was surely more eminent to understand the genesis and status of Article
370 than some of the noted journalists who, after all, were employed as
Information Officers in different Government Departments, during Pt. Nehru's
Government and later. Pandit Nehru was for early annulment of this temporary
provision in our Constitution. He, however, preferred an initiative to
come from the State Government. G.M. Sadiq, who had just taken over as
Chief Minister of the State, had assured him in regard to this initiative.
He had already written an article in the Hindustan Times suggesting annulment
of this Article. However Pt.Nehru's death, Pakistan's aggression of India
in Rann of Kutchh and subsequently on Jammu and Kashmir itself, caused
the postponement of such a step. And soon political detractors of Sadiq
in his own party, impatient to usurp power, played the communal card by
propping up Jammat-i-Islami. This made Sadiq's job difficult and he died
very soon. By then Indira Gandhi regime got stabilised and only personal
loyalty and devotion to Indira mattered and all other issues were put on
the back-burner. This loyalty and sycophancy she got in abundance from
Kashmiri leaders belonging to her Congress Party.
The former princely State of Jammu and Kashmir
acceded to India in terms of Indian Independence Act and the Mountbatten
Plan. The settlement about partition and transfer of contiguous Muslim
majority areas to Pakistan applied to British India alone. It had no relevance
to the princely States.
The United States has been treating Pakistan
with velvet gloves. Besides providing assistance worth billions of dollars
to her, U.S. and its allies turned a blind eye on the successful effort
of the Pakistani military establishment to acquire nuclear weaponry. The
Reagan and Bush administration permitted Pakistan to acquire U.S. nuclear
technology and then broke the law by hiding from Congress what they knew
about Pakistan's pursuit of nuclear warheads. Pakistan is not being declared
a terrorist State in spite of all evidence, on the plea that Pentagon has
a deep linkage with Pakistani military establishment. President Bill Clinton
has promised more job to Americans and is, therefore, sure to use economic
or other power to expand American trade at the expense of countries like
India. His administration appears to be a votary of bilateral pressure
to increase American exports. Super laws and human rights are kept zooming
round the world like U-2 planes of earlier days.
America has begun to use the stick of human
rights against India. This method has two-fold advantages. It will give
respectability to its anti-India moves and also attract many supporters
within India. India has not to learn lessons from U.S. on human rights,
given its track record in Vietnam. India has its own security environment,
its political, economic and social conditions, priorities and its own judgement
of what needs to be done. People of India have basic character and traditional
trait of courage of their convictions and to fight resolutely and relentlessly
for their countries territorial integrity and other national interests
unmindful of adverse international opinion. Linking of U.S. aid to India
with its human rights record and taking objection to the laws which India
has been compelled to enforce for its internal and external security will
not brow-beat India into submission. Armed insurgency in Kashmir ought
to be seen in the background of rising crescendo of Islamic fundamentalism
and the theocratic regimes which are extending moral and material support
to the terrorist movement. Islamic countries with pronounced fundamentalist
orientation have their centres of subversion in various places in the country.
The Kashmir insurgency is closely linked with the Afghan Mujahideen activities
and Iranian export of Islamic revolution. Afghan and Sudanese mercenaries
have already been active in the Valley and their number is likely to swell
in the near future. Sections of the Indian civil society and some American
experts and sections in various Indian political parties like the left,
Royists, self-styled human right activists etc. are lending implicit support
to the secessionist movement in Kashmir. The ISI has its active and passive
agencies in the Valley. India needs to take two urgent steps in Kashmir.
One is to enable the local population to get fed up with the insurgency
and the second is to ensure that the enormous funds, which the government
is pouring into the Valley, do not wholly become available to the terrorists.
If this diversion of funds is not stopped at once, the Valley will prove
to be a bottomless pit for India's resources. "What
is left undone in one minute is restored by no
eternity"
|