Cockpit of Central
Asia: Afghanistan Factor in Tajikistan's
Crisis
K. Warikoo
K. Warikoo (born in Srinagar, 1951) is
Associate Professor of Central Asian Studies, School of International
Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. His major publications
include:
1. Central Asia and Kashmir: A Study in the Context
of Anglo-Russian Rivalry;
2. Ethnicity and Politics in Central Asia;
3. Afghanistan Factor in Central and South Asian
Politics;
4. Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh: A Comprehensive
Bibliography;
5. Central Asia: Emerging New Order, and
6. Society and Culture in the Himalayas. |
Geographical contiguity,
racial and religious affinity and long established border trade have provided
a strong basis for cross-border fraternization between the people of Central
Asia and adjoining Afghanistan, particularly its northern part also known
as Afghan Turkestan. Afghanistan not only shares its borders with the three
Central Asian states of Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Turkmanistan, but the
majority of people settled in northern Afghanistan are also of the Central
Asian stock. About 4 million Tajiks, 1.7 million Uzbeks and half a million
Turkmens live in Afghanistan. Besides, the Pamir Tajiks living in the Gorno
Badakhshan Autonomous oblast of Tajikistan share their language and lifestyle
with their counterparts in the Badakhshan region of Afghanistan.
AFGHANISTAN AND CENTRAL ASIA: TRANS-BORDER CONTACTS
Notwithstanding their intra-ethnic or intra-tribal
diversities, this Central Asian population of northern Afghanistan has
been quite conscious of its group identity as distinct from the Pashtun
majority of Afghanistan. This is becoming increasingly obvious from the
political assertion by the Uzbek and Tajik factions led by General Dostam
and Ahmad Shah Masood, respectively, in the post-Najib era in Afghanistan.
For most part of its history, the influence of Pashtuns and the central
government at Kabul over Afghan Turkestan including Badakhshan has remained
tenuous at least till Amir Abdur Rahman Khan subdued the area in 1884.
And at about the same time, the northern boundary of Afghanistan was delineated
and duly recognized by the Afghan, British and Russian authorities. Areas
north of the Oxus such as Shignan, Roshan, Pamirs etc. came under Russian
control and the areas south of the Oxus including Wakhan were recognized
as part of Afghanistan. But this did not mean the cessation of links between
the two sides.
The traditional border trade and family
ties between the people of this region developed over the years particularly
after the improvement of communication facilities under the Soviet regimes.
The Soviets used the cultural similarities among people living north and
south of the Oxus, to bolster the pro-Soviet regimes in Afghanistan. Closer
interaction between Afghanistan and Tajikistan, particularly the exchange
of students, academics, literateures, artists, media persons, cultural
delegations etc. was encouraged. Mazar-i-Sharif became the main center
of economic exchanges between the two sides, as it was well connected by
roads with Central Asia. Cotton produced in northern Afghanistan was trucked
to Tashkent for processing. Movement of people and their goods increased.
Afghanistan and Tajikistan signed agreements of technical, scientific,
educational and cultural cooperation envisaging exchanges of scholars,
scientists etc. A joint Afghan-Tajik enterprise Intertrans which was set
up in southern Tajikistan's Kurgan Tyube oblast, engaged itself in the
transport of textile and consumer goods from Afghanistan to Tajikistan.
In September 1992 Mayors of Dushanbe and Mazar-i-Sharif signed formal agreements
on economic and social cooperation. Similarly an Afghan firm concluded
an agreement with the Central Samarkand Store undertaking to supply goods
to Samarkand. In southern Turkmenistan, a power line was laid up to the
Afghan border village of Mari Chaq to bring electricity to more than 1000
Turkmen families living in this village. More recently, Afghanistan has
joined the Iran sponsored Association of Persian Speaking Peoples. A joint
meeting of the member countries - Iran, Tajikistan and Afghanistan was
held in Teheran in February 1992 in which it was agreed to revive and spread
the Persian language, traditions and customs of the three countries. All
these measures have only helped in strengthening the hands between the
people and more 50 those of the Central Asian racial stock living on both
sides of the Oxus.
RISE OF ISLAMIC MILITANCY IN TAJIKISTAN
The specter of cross border movement, which was earlier
limited to social and trade contacts, changed dramatically after the Soviet
army's intervention in Afghanistan which was perceived as direct Communist
attack on Islam. The Soviets and those who represented the Soviet regimes
came to be seen as the enemies of Islam. This was more so because most
of the present settlers in northern Afghanistan had left Central Asia as
refugees at the height of anti-Soviet Basmachi movement (1917-21) and the
collectivisation campaigns in early 1930s. For instance, Azad Beg - the
sixty year old leader of the Islamic Union of the Northern Provinces of
Afghanistan (Ittihadiya-i-Islami-yi-vilayat-i-Samt-i-Shamil-i-Afghanistan),
who is responsible for numerous operations against the Soviet forces, is
closely related to Ibrahim Beg, one of the leader of the Basmachi movement.
(Naseeruddin, the last Amir of Kokand was Azad Beg's maternal great grandfather).
That this Islamic Union was founded in Peshawar in 198I with the help of
Pakislan government for "bringing together all the Turks (az Nizhadi-Turk)
of Afghanistan and then to liberate Soviet Turkestan", was disclosed by
Azad Beg himself in an interview to a French scholar, Olivier Roy. Pakistan's
Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) provided Azad Beg "great deal of money
and weapons to build an alternative framework for channeling Turkic nationalism
against both the Soviet and Kabul regimes''. It is not a mere coincidence
that Pakistan's forward policy in Afghanistan and trans-Oxiana was pursued
by Mirza Aslam Beg, former Chief of Pakistan's army, who is a descendant
of a Central Asian muhajir and is also related to Azad Beg. Azad Beg did
succeed in enlisting the support of some Uzbek, Tajik and even Turkmen
field commanders, notably Uzbek muhajirs from Soviet Central Asia like
Khaluddin of Kunduz and Ait Murad from Barqa (Baghlan province). Azad beg
who has been operating in Balkh, Djauzdjan, Farib, Sari Pul and Samangan
areas, has been actively involved in shipping weapons to his Islamic supporters
in Tajikistan". That the Central Asian muhajirs from Tajikistan who migrated
to Afghanistan during the Bolshevik revolution are in the forefront of
what is described as jehad (Holy war), was confirmed by Mohammad Sharif
Himatzade, Chief of Islamic Renaissance party (IRP) presently in exile
in Afghanistan. Common ethnic and religious background of the people inhabiting
this border region facilitated the cross-border smuggling of religious
and subversive literature, arms and ammunition by the Afghan mujahideen
into Tajikistan.
The rapid politicization of Islam and the emergence
of a militant Islamic fundamentalist movement in Tajikistan took place
after the Soviet action in Afghanistan. This coupled with the success of
Khomeini revolution in Iran brought a new awakening among the Muslims of
Central Asia. The Central Asian clerics and Sufi brotherhoods which withstood
the Soviet policies, now not only became stronger but came under the influence
of Wahabism - the radical and politicized form of Islam. The Afghan mujahideen
established wide contacts with the Tajiks particularly after the Soviet
troops most of whom were from Central Asia, landed in Afghanistan. They
started crossing the border into Tajikistan where they were greeted by
radical Islamic activists. Afghan mujahideen Leaders acknowledge that the
1979 Soviet military intervention in Afghanistan "helped re-establish links
between the Tajiks and their Muslim brethren in Afghanistan, who have the
same language, same culture, same religion and same ancestors in common''.
Another mujahideen leader Masood Khalili disclosed that Soviet soldiers
conscripted from Tajikistan were not only reluctant to fire on Afghans
but they even sold their rifles to purchase the Koran. Two Afghan resistance
parties, namely Jamat-i-lslami led by Burhannuddin Rabbani and Hizb-e-islami
of Gulbadin Hikmatyar were particularly active enrolling members and distributing
shabnemeh (night letters) in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. These Afghan mujahideen
groups evoked maximum response from young Tajiks with high education, especially
teachers and engineers.
Reports about the active involvement of Afghan
mujahideen in propagating jihad in Tajikistan began to appear in the Soviet
press since 1986, that is following Gorbachev's policy of glasnost (openness)
in the media. K.M. Makhkamov, the then first Secretary of the Tajik Communist
Party admitted at a party rneeting held in Dushanbe on August 30, 1986
that young people and children were getting increasingly swayed by propaganda
from across the border. Communist Tadjikistana of December 30, 1987 published
a statement of Tajik KGB Chief, Petkel confirming the existence of "hostile
foreign ideological centres and organisations in Tajikistan". An article
in the same paper of May 13, 1988 disclosed that Islamic revolutionary
literature was being distributed in thousands, which was later confirmed
by Afghan mujahideen sources. There was wide circulation of audio cassettes,
video films etc. to spread radical Islam in Tajikistan. Works of Maududi
- the founder of Jamat-i-lslami, Said Kutab, Muhammed Kutab and Jamal Din
Afghani, the noted Muslim revolutionary were translated into Russian and
printed at Peshawar and then smuggled across Afghanistan into Tajikistan
for wide circulation. Wahabism gained roots in the rural areas of Tajikistan
especially along the Tajik-Afghan border. The Wahabi literature that was
smuggled via Afghanistan, lays emphasis on religious absolutism and is
opposed to Sufism and holy shrines which represent the traditional and
tolerant trend in Islam. Tajikistan's Wahabi leader Abdullo Saidov advocated
the creation of an Islamic State and called for jehad against the Soviets.
This ideological onslaught was followed by the smuggling of arms and militant
cadres across the Oxus. That the Soviet Borderguards under the authority
of KGB failed to prevent illicit traffic on the Tajik-Afghan border was
illustrated in March and April 1987 when Afghan mujahideen staged two cross-border
armed attacks in Kulyab and Kurgan Tyube regions of southern Tajikistan.
Apart from the surreptious trans-border movements and smuggling of arms
and ammunition, Afghan mujahideen leaders openly abetted rise of militancy
among the Muslims of Tajikistan. For instance, Burhannudin Rabbani and
Ahmed Shah Masood, both being Tajiks and belonging to Jamat-i-Islami faction,
reacted strongly to the Dushanbe disturbances of February 1990 (anti-Armenian
riots). They characterised these disturbances as "freedom movement" or
"internal revolt" against the "Soviet Subjugation". Harping on the linguistic,
cultural, religious and racial affinity of Tajiks and Afghans, these leaders
exhorted the Muslims in Central Asia to break from Moscow. Rabbani warned
that "the Afghans living on this side could create complications for the
Soviets".
From the foregoing discussion it becomes clear
that the Afghan mujahideen groups with active guidance and assistance of
Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) played a key role in fomenting
the Islamic military in Tajikistan with a view to establish a friendly
Islamic State there. The Deputy Chairman of Tajikistan's KGB, Belousov
openly accused Pakistan's intelligence services of carrying out a subversive
programme code-named 'M' to destabilise the socio-political situation in
Central Asia. Belousov claimed that 150 groups of Afghan mujahideen were
operating near the Tajik border and training centres were set up to give
religious and military training to youth Tajiks. And by the time the Soviet
Union crumbled, an underground network of Islamic movements, arms dumps
and trained Islamic militants had positioned themselves in Tajikistan for
launching the offensive to oust the remnants of Communist system and establish
an Islamic form of government. This is borne out by the subsequent events
in Tajikistan which has witnessed the rise of Islamic fundamentalist political
parties and proliferation of armed bands resulting in bloody armed clashes
between rival groups.
CRISIS IN TAJIKISTAN
Soon after its independence in 1991, Tajikistan has
been engulfed by political conflict and violent inter-group clashes between
the pro- Communist and the Islamist forces and their supporters. Regional
disparitics both in terms of ethnic composition and economic-industrial
base, have further complicated the situation. Khodjand in the north and
Kulyab in the south of Tajikistan, which have a strong presence of Uzbek
population, have been the communist strongholds. These have given determined
fight to the radical Islamic groups led by the Islamic Renaissance Party
(IRP) and the Rastokhez, which draw support from majority of Tajiks living
in Dushanbe and Kurgan Tyube and Gorno Badakhshan regions which are adjoining
Afghanistan. Trans-border infiltration of armed bands and smuggling of
arms has been the main destabilising factor. Besides, Afghan Mujahedin
controlling the Afghan border have been actively involved in armed clashes
with the Russian and Tajik border guards. About 500 Tajik transgressors
were reported to have been detained at the Tajik-Afghan border in the first
six months of 1992 alone. 50 Afghans who were heading for Termez with drugs
were also detained. The establishment of Islamic government in Afghanistan
led by Mujahideen factions gave a boost to Islamic fundamentalist groups
in Tajikistan. The Gorno Badakhshan Autonomous Oblast, which is populated
by the Ismailis and where the influence of Islamist groups has been strong,
declared itself as Badakhshan Autonomous Republic in April 1992. On May
10, 1992 the Chairman of Democratic Party of Tajikistan, Shodmon Yusufov
issued a public appeal to Afghanistan asking for aid in the ongoing conflict
between pro-Nabiyev and Islamic opposition forces and also against the
"interference" of the CIS forces in "Tajikistan's internal crisis". This
statement only accentuated the crisis, as the incidence of cross-border
infiltration and smuggling of arms from Afghanistan increased manifold.
So much so, a civil war like situation developed in some areas of Tajikistan
resulting in bloodshed, killings and refugee problems. The Deputy Commandant
of the Central Asian Border District, Major General A. Martovitsky later
confirmed that after Yusufov's statement there were increased attempts
by groups to cross the Tajik-Afghan border and get weaponry for the opposition
parties.
The violent clashes in Kurgan Tyube between
the rival parties and the victory of Islamic opposition parties over pro-communists
in May 1992 led to unprecedented exodus of Russians and Uzbeks from the
region. In fact Shodmon Yusufov's public threat that they would seek aid
from "Afghan brothers" and that national minorities in Tajikistan could
be used as hostages" created a panic reaction among the Uzbek and Russian
minorities. The situation on the Tajik-Afghan border became tense and all
efforts by the local commander of CIS border forces to persuade the local
Afghan majahideen leader belonging to Hizb-e-Islami, Abdul Latif Ibrahimi
to prevent arms smuggling and infiltration of armed persons failed to yieid
any result. Latif not only admitted the fact of illegal entry of Tajik
groups into Afghan territory for arms, he also refused to hand over these people
without authorisation by the Tajik opposition party which had sent
these groups. In Kulyab region too, otherwise the strong support base of
Nabiyev, the members of opposition Democratic Party organised themselves
with the active Afghan assistance. A number of groups from Kulyab came
to Dushanbe and openly threatened to seek armed assistance from Afghans.
The spurt in incidents of border violations
and armed clashes on the Tajik-Afghan border during July to September 1992
escalated the tension. In July alone more than 80 persons (both Tajiks
and Afghans) were detained on the border and hundreds of automatic guns,
grenade launchers, plastic mines and tons of thousands of ammunition pieces
were confiscated. There were about 20 cases of firing on the border guards
from the Afghan side. Over 150 border crossers with arms and ammunition
were reportedly captured by Russian border guards in September 1992 alone.
The situation became so tense that the Tajik government expressed concern
over the continued and systematic violation of border and supply of Afghan
weapons and drugs into Tajikistan. About 400 rifles were confiscated on
the Tajik- Afghan border between May and December 1992, which was a meagre
fraction of more than 20,000 weapons reported to be in illegal possession
of armed groups in Tajikistan. Fighting in Tajikistan which raged during
this period involved regional, ethnic and clan disputes as well as differences
in political and religious connections. By the end of 1992, about 50,000
were reported to have been killed in these armed clashes, whereas more
than six lakhs became refugees.
Rakhmon Nabiyev, the former Communist who
had been elected as the President of Tajikistan in November 1991, tried
to buy peace by including members of the Islamist opposition groups in
government and administration. But the IRP and its supporters were determined
to wrest total political control. On September 7, 1992 Nabiyev's motorcade
was attacked at Dushanbe airport and soon after his government was ousted
by an alliance of Islamist forces comprising the IRP, Raslokhez and the
Democratic party, under the leadership of A. Iskandrov. This was followed
by violent clashes between Nabiyev's supporters and his opponents in Kurgan
Tyube regions. Subsequently the anti-Islamists rallied their forces and
formed regional government in Kulyab and Khodjend. Finally in December
1992, they stormed the capital and installed Imamali Rakhmanov as the new
leader. Rakhmanov and his forces have since been working to rid Tajikistan
of radical Islamic extremists, who retreated into the Gorno Badakhshan
region and also sought refuge in Afghanistan. It was in January 1993 that
the new government was able to strengthen its position in the eastern parts
of Tajikistan. The Garmsky region, which had declared itself as an independent
Islamic Republic was freed of Islamists' control soon after in the last
week of February 1993. On March 2, 1993 the Tajik Government announced
the recapture Or Tadjikabad. The State Procurator General, Mukhamadnazar
Sabikhov claimed that during the offensive over 100 tonnes of weapons and
20 lanks and armoured vehicles had been captured. By March 1993, the Tajik
government had thus consolidated its control over most of the country.
Government sources claimed in early June 1993 that about 5,90,000 refugees
had returned to their homes and the Tajik authorities had taken steps for
guaranteeing their housing, employment and personal safety. However, with
the concentration of Islamist radicals in the southern mountainous province
of Badakhshan, this vast and rugged terrain continues to pose problems
for the Tajik government forces. Tavildara, Komsomolabad, Kharog and other
areas in lhe Pamirs are the strongholds of opposition groups. Notwithstanding
the peace initiatives persued by Rakhmanov government using the well respected
Ismaili leader, Syed Mohammad Naderi as its mediator, peace is still fragile
in Badakhshan.
With the leaders of Tajik opposition groups and
their Tajik supporters numbering about 90,000 seeking refuge in Afghanistan
and the active involvement of Afghan mujahideen leaders in arming and training
these Islamist radicals, prospects of peace and stability returning to
Tajikistan remain elusive. Clashes belween Islamist fighters and Russian/Tajik
security forces have been taking place along the Tajik Afghan border. More
than 50 militants were killed when some 200 to 300 Islamic radicals and
Afghan mujahideen intruded into Shurohabad around April 20, I993. Eruption
of serious clashes on the Tajik-Afghan border on July 13, 1993 when at
least 25 Russian border guards, 70 Islamic fighters and 200 civilians were
reportedly killed, highlighted the explosive nature of the situation. This
incident sparked outrage in Russia and Afghanistan was warned of punitive
military action in the event of further trans-border raids into Tajikistan. Soon after, Russian forces launched artillery and air attacks on the bases
of Tajik militant and Afghan mujahideen in northern Afghanistan. Tension
on the border mounted again when 1 Kazakh and 4 Russian border guards were
taken hostage to Afghanistan after their unit was ambushed by the Islamic
militants on August 10, 1993. Tajik opposition groups namely Islamic Renaissance
Party, Democratic Party led by Shodmon Yusuf, National Front led by Abdul
Jabbar Takir and Lal- e-Badakhshan of Atta Beg, have joined hands and set
up a Tajik government in exile in Taloqan, Afghanistan. Both the Jamat-i-Islami
and Hizb-e- Islami led by Gulbadin Hikmatyar are reported to be "training
and arming" Tajik militants in guerilla warfare against the Tajik government.
A local Hizb-e-Islami commander, Mohammad Zaman claimed in an interview
with Washington Post that his party had trained about 1000 Tajiks most
of whom "filtered back into Tajikistan". An Islamic field commander in
Gorno Badakhshan was quoted by Interfax as saying that 15,000 Afghan trained
Tajik mujahideen had infiltrated Tajikistan, which was in addition to several
groups of 70 to 300 men undergoing training in Afghanistan. Given this
situation, there has been no let-up in tension on the Tajik-Afghan border.
In fact the fighting escalated in Pyandz in mid-September and Gorno-Badakhshan
region in October 1993. Meanwhile, the Tajik Islamist radicals have set
up a new Radio Station "Voice of Free Tadjikistan" somewhere in Afghanistan,
which stated operating since mid - October, 1993. The Tajik Islamic leader
and their supporters presently in exile in Afghanistan have become radicalised.
Encouraged by the active military support received from major political
parties such as Jamat-e-Islami and Hizb-e-Islami of Afghanistan, the IRP
leaders have taken a hardline posture declaring its opposition to any peace
talks with the Tajik government. They have also refused to accept Uzbekistan
as a party in these negotiations. One may be skeptical about the claim
of IRP leader, M.S.Himatzade that "more than fifty percent of Tajik territory
was now in hands of the alliance of four main resistance parties", but
there is no denying the fact that the Tajik Islamic militants and their
Afghan mujahideen allies are preparing to launch fresh offensive. And it
does not augur well for regional peace and security.
UZBEKISTAN'S REACTION
Uzbekistan has been the foremost CIS state to take
strong notice of the developments in Tajikistan and the continuing crisis
situation on the Tajik- Afghan border. The Uzbek President, Islam Karimov
has been repeatedly warning against the "advance of Islamic fundamentalist
and extremist forces from Afghanistan and Tajikistan". Karimov's fears
are based on the belief that events in Tajikistan would not only consolidate
the rapidly growing Islamic consciousness in Uzbekistan but also lead to
its politicisation. The increasing clout of militant Wahabi radicals including
the formation of armed bands in Ferghana valley and influx of Uzbek/Tajik
refugees and even Afghan nationals into Uzbekistan further strengthened
these fears. We have it on the authority of Tajik Islamist opposition leaders
that Uzbek Islamic volunteers from Ferghana valley have been participating
in the ongoing "jehad" against pro-Communist regime in Tajikistan. It is
also known that the Afghan General Abdul Latif, associated with the Hizb-e-Islami
of Gulbadin Hikmatyar, is an ethnic Uzbek and he had been conducting fierce
attacks on the Tajik government positions from his base in Imam Saheb area
in northern Afghanistan. Presence of a sizeable number of ethnic Tajiks
who constitute about a quarter of Uzbekistan's population, is yet another
factor for the Uzbek concern over disorder in Tajikistan. Thcre have been
reports about massive influx of refugees from Tajikistan, majority of them being
Tajiks, into the Samarkand and Bukhara regions of Uzbekistan which
is worrisome for Uzbekistan keeping in view Tajikistan's claims over these
two cities.
Disquietened at these developments, President
Karimov initiated a series of steps to meet the perceived security threat
to Uzbekistan. During 1992 when the Islamic opposition groups were in control
in Tajikistan, Karimov launched suppression of the Uzbek opposition groups
like Birlik and the Islamic radicals in Ferghana. He sealed Uzbekistan's
borders with Tajikistan and Afghanistan and closed all traffic from that
direction to prevent any influx of arms and men. More than 2000 foreigners
(mainly Tajiks and some Afghans) are reported to have been expelled from
Uzbekistan on charges of "illegal entry and for involvement in subversion
in Ferghana valley". Recently Uzbekistan's Security Chief, G. Aliyev claimed
to have recovered arms, explosives and even drugs from the possession of
some Tajiks who aimed at "sparking off Tajik style conflict in Uzbekistan
and also foment Tajik-Uzbek clashes''.
At other level, Karimov has kept channels of his
friendly communication open with General Dostam, an ethnic Uzbek and the
powerful military leader in Afghanistan with his stronghold in Mazar-i-Sharif.
Dostam visited Tashkent several times during 1992 and held discussions
with the Uzbek authorities. In November 1992 Dostam's troops captured a
key Amu Darya river crossing to Taiikistan at Sher Khan Bandar which was
earlier used by Hikmatyar's Hizb-e-Islami as a staging point for cross-border
forays. Subsequently a network of border posts along the river supported
by boat patrol was set up under the new Afghan Uzbek Commander in-charge
of border security, Maj. Gen. Abdul Hamid Aka. This led to sealing of an
important channel of supply of arms and support to Tajikistan's Islamic
opposition. Besides, Dostam has been in close touch with General Nadiri,
a leader of the Ismailis and some other important personalities in northern
Afghanistan in order to influence the course of events there. That Dostam's
family has been staying in Tashkent on a long term basis is also cited
as evidence of cooperation between Dostam and Uzbek authorities. There
have been reports that General Dostam and Uzbek President, Karimov have
been toying with the idea of creating a "secular buffer state" in northern
Afghanistan to cover the southern borders of Tajikistan and Uzbekistan
which would act as a wedge against the spread of radical Islam from the
direction of Iran from the west and from the side of Pashtuns under Hikmatyar
from the south. However, it becomes clear that there is a basic understanding
between Dostam and the Uzbek leadership on the need to keep at bay the
radical Islamist fighters.
The Uzbek President, Karimov took the initiative
in mobilising regional response against external interference in Tajikistan.
He called upon Russia to take into account the "powerful offensive of pan-Islamism"
in the south and asked for continued presence of Russian forces in Tajikistan
to control the Tajik-Afghan border. Karimov explained that the "border
between Tajikistan and Afghanistan is not only a border between these two
states, it can turn inlo an open gate to all CIS countries from the point
of view of arms smuggling, drug running etc." Karimov also initiated diplomatic
moves to stop the situation on Tajik-Afghan border from spilling over into
other republics. He has been urging upon the leaders in Iran and Afghanistan
to help in defusing the tension. Uzbek Foreign Minister was deputed to
Teheran in October 1992 to seek Iran's cooperation for settling the issue
peacefully. Karimov has been pleading with the CIS leadership particularly
Russia and Kazakhstan to take note of the alarming situation. On March
14,1993 Karimov appealed to the UN Secretary General seeking his help in
"ensuring the security and inviolability of border between Tajikistan and
Afghanistan". He warned that the continuing conflict in Tajikistan could
become a "powerful detonator of political and social upheavals in the region".
Karimov wanted the UN to take note of the "arms and ammunition being stockpiled
and camps set up for terrorist groups in Afghanistan for sabotage and subversion".
Karimov's stand that the southern borders of Tajikistan are the southern
boundary of all CIS countries, has finally been accepted and endorsed by
thc CIS leaders in August 1993.
THREAT TO KYRGYZSTAN'S SECURITY
That the turbulence and strife in Tajikistan has
spilled over into the neighbouring state of Kyrgyzstan is evidenced by
the influx of thousands of armed Tajik Islamic radicals into the Osh oblast.
The Kharogh-Osh highway which provides direct access form Gorno-Badakhshan
region of Tajikistan to the CIS is also used as the channel of drug trafficking
via Kyrgyzstan. The republican leadership has been worried over the protracted
civil war in Tajikistan and the possibility of Tajik armed groups supplying
arms to Kyrgyz criminal bands. The Kyrgyz President, Akayev publicly expressed
his concern over the steep increase in the crime rate witnessed in Kyrgyzstan
during 1992 (70 per cent in the whole state and 220 per cent in Osh oblast)
and most of this crime was related to drugs. To meet this new threat of
illegal entry of narcotics and arms from Tajik territory into Osh through
the Afghanislan - Pamirs route, the Kyrgyz army and militia units were
transferred from Bishkek to Osh.
Pan-Islamic Tajik radicals also seem to
have established some foothold in Osh. In early January 1993 reports came
about the disruption of supplies to Osh by the Tajik militants who also
killed 3 local Kyrgyzs and held 18 others hostages in the border area of
Jergetal of Kyrgyzstan, for their refusal to join their pan-Islamic movement.
They are also reported to have hoisted the green Islamic flag on the building
of regional administration. These Tajik radicals have been urging the local
Kyrgyz populace, which is not so fervent in its Islamic zeal, to fight
for the establishment of an Islamic state. The Islamic resurgence in Tajikistan
and also in Ferghana region of Uzbekistan, has already created a marked
impact on the Uzbeks in the Osh oblast. This is reflected in a study conducted
by the Bishkek Polytechnical Institute, which found that 25 per cent of
Uzbeks in Osh oblast favour the establishment of an Islamic state in Kyrgyzstan
as against only 10 per cent of Kyrgyzs there. Bitter memories of the Uzbek-Kyrgyz
riots that took place in 1990 are yet another source of social turmoil
and political instability in the region. Similarly, the border dispute
between Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, which was the cause of Tajik-Kyrgyz
clashes in 1989 in Batken region of Kyrgyzstan over division of land and
water, has not been resolved yet.
Conscious of this uneasy situation, Kyrgyzstan
has been pressing for the conclusion of a formal treaty with Tajikistan
to confirm and consolidate the "inviolability of the existing borders".
At the same time, Kyrgyzstan has in consonance with the CIS agreement on
collective security of the Tajik-Afghan border, sent a battalion of Kyrgyz
troops to take positions at the border posts of Ishkashim and Murghab in
Tajikistan. It signifies an end to the earlier reluctance to commit Kyrgyz
troops, which was essentially due to the local women's protest against
sending their sons to what they viewed a second Afghanistan and in deference
to the Parliament's decision against Kyrgyzstan's participation in defending
the Tajik-Afghan border. Due to the escalation of conflict on the Tajik-Afghan
border, better understanding of the security threat to Kyrgyzstan from
drugs and arms trafficking and influx of armed Tajik/Afghan militants has
dawned upon the political leadership. The need to take urgent preventive
steps has been left more so because the Kharogh-Osh highway provides direct
connection from the republic to the stronghold of Islamic radicals in Gorno
Badakhshan region of Tajikistan.
RUSSIAN RESPONSE
Preoccupied with its own domestic problems and obsessed
with the Eurocentric approach in its foreign policy, Russia initially viewed
the crisis in Tajikistan as an internecine struggle for power between rival
groups, in which it did not wish to get involved. This perception was mainly
based on the past Soviet experience in Afghanistan which had cost the Soviet
Union too high in terms of men, materials and international image. The
Central Asian Border Guards and their Russian commanders, who continued
to remain under the CIS unified command, did not receive adequate support
from Russia after the disintegration of USSR. The Border Guards defending
the Tajik-Afghan border were now facing acute shortage of men, fuel and
funds which prevented them to get reinforcements or increase mobility for
effectively dealing with the increased border violations. Besides, the
Russian officers and troops were reluctant to shed their blood for the
security of Tajikistan which was now an independent and sovereign country.
At one stage, even the air defence radar stations at Pamirs broke down
in October 1992 due to lack of infrastructural support by Russia. This
confusing scenario not only worsened the border situation but also emboldened
the Tajik and Afghan militant groups. However, in response to Nabiyev's
requests for assistance, Russian Vice Premier, A. Shokhin visited Tajikistan
in July 1992 and reached an agreement on the "status of Russian troops
in Tajikistan and modalities for recruitment, material and technical supplies
by Russia". It was agreed that the Tajik-Afghan and Tajik-Chinese borders
would be reinforced by the Russian subdivisions. Subsequently, President
Yeltsin issued a decree placing the border troops stationed on the Tajik
border under Russian jurisdiction. Soon after, the CIS Commander-in-Chief,
E. Shaposhnikov visited Tajikistan at the end of August 1992 and reached
a preliminary agreement on the deployment of forces. These measures were
intended to remove the structural anomalies in the functioning of the border
troops in Tajikistan. But it was a belated response to the fast deteriorating
situation in Tajikistan.
Nabiyev's ouster on September 2, 1992 by the Islamic
extremist parties and the escalation of fighting in Tajikistan provoked
prompt and strong reaction from Russia and the neighbouring Central Asian
states. Just one day after the removal of Nabiyev, the Presidents of Russia,
Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan issued a warning to the government
and political organisations of Tajikistan describing the unrest as a danger
to the CIS. They also announced their collective decision to deploy CIS
troops along the 1300 km long Tajik-Afghan border to stop the large scale
smuggling of arms and cross border movement of armed bands. Towards the
end of September 1992 the Russian Defence Minister sent additional troops
to strengthen the beleaguered 201st Motorised Rifle Division stationed
in Tajikistan and authorised its commanding officers to prevent "seizure
of arms, equipment and munitions belonging to Russian troops and unlawful
acts against Russian Servicemen and their families". But matters were made
worse by the connivance of Tajik authorities and leaders with the armed
Tajik extremist groups and Afghan field commanders. Piqued at this ground
situation the Russian Border Guards Officers Corps in Tajikistan sent an
appeal to Boris Yeltsin, the President of Russia on November 13, 1992 questioning
the "expediency of further stay of their units in the absence of guarantees
of legal and social protection". The problem was compounded by the stiff
opposition by Tajik media and Islamic parties to the presence of Russian
troops who were accused of interference in the internal affairs of Tajikistan
and were even charged of supplying/selling arms and fuel to anti-Islamic
forces. Tajik Deputy Premier, Davlot Usman compared the ongoing conflict
in Tajikistan to Russian intervention in Afghanistan and called it as "a
war between Tajikistan and Russia, a war between Islam and non-believers".
Protest rallies against the Russian presence were held in Dushanbe on October
6, 1992 which were also addressed by Tajik Prcsident, Iskandrov and the
Chief Kazi, Turadzonzoda. On the other hand, Kulyab and Khodjent oblasts
and also the Russian and Uzbek minorities sought additional CIS peace keeping
troops to bring order in Tajikistan. Russians held a rally in Kulyab on
October 10, 1992 appealing Yeltsin to keep units of 201st Motor Rifle Division
of Russian troops in Tajikistan.
Increasing attacks on Russians and their continuing
exodus from Tajikistan became important factors in determining Russia's
active policy in this region. Now senior leaders of the Russian government
and military openly voiced their concern over the security of Russian minorities
and vowed to discharge their responsibilities on this account. Whereas
Khasbulatov, Chairman of Russian Federation Supreme Soviet wrote to the
new Tajik President, Iskandrov asking him to "guarantee the security of
Russians living in the Republic", the Russian Foreign Minister, Kozyrev
warned that the "entire might of Russian state is poised to defend human
rights, including the rights of Russians and of Russian speaking people".
Similarly, the Russian Dy. Defence Minister, General Toporov viewed the
presence of Russian troops in Tajikistan as necessary to protect Russians
there. The Russian Foreign Ministry issued a strongly worded statement
on October 15, 1992 expressing concern over the "expanding fratricidal
civil war in Tajikistan and the danger of conflict spreading to adjacent
countries. It drew the attention of Tajik authorities, movements and leaders
to"the attempts to provoke outbursts of anti-Russia and anti- Russian sentiments
and use of violence against Russians and attacks on Russian servicemen".
It warned that "Russia will do everything necessary to protect the legitimate
rights and interests of the Russians". This signalled an end to the drift
in Russia's policy towards Tajikistan. Now Moscow took the lead in involving
the concerned Central Asian states of Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan
and Kazakhstan or evolving a joint strategy to control the situation on
the Tajik-Afghan border. A meeting of leaders of these Central Asian states
and the Russian Foreign Minister, A. Kozyrev was held at Alma Ata on November
4, 1392. It was agreed that Russian 201st Motor Rifle Division should remain
in Tajikistan, which could be supplemented later by CIS peace keeping forces.
Next day Kozyrev led a CIS delegation to Tajikistan for on the spot study.
He also met the Russians trapped in Kulyab. It was at the Minsk summit
of the Heads of CIS States on January 22,1993 that a formal decision to
reinforce the Russian border troops by forces from the neighbouring CIS
slates for effectively closing the Tajik-Afghan border was taken.
Despite Russia's success in mustering the support
of four CIS states, it were the Russian forces which bore the brunt of
defending the Tajik- Afghan frontier. The massacre of more than 25 Russian
border guards on the Tajik border post on July 13, 1993 sent shock waves
in Russian official and public circles. President Yeltsin called a special
session of the Russian Security Council in Moscow on July 26, 1993 to take
stock of the situation and adopt remedial measures. Taking the border incident
seriously, Yeltsin described the Tajik-Afghan border as "the frontier of
Russia", and removed Shlyakhtin, the commander of Russian Border troops
from his post. The Russian Security Minister, Victor Barannikov was also
reprimanded. It was for the first time that a comprehensive Russian policy
aimed at settling the problem on the Tajik-Afghan border and at normalising
the situation in Tajikistan was worked out and adopted in the form of a
Presidential decree. It was decided to seek political solution to the crisis
by organising a diplomatic dialogue between Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,
Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Afghanistan, and to encourage talks between
the Tajik leadership and the opposition leaders. At the same time, need
for taking coordinated steps by the Russian ministries of Security Internal
Affairs, Defence and Foreign Affairs on Tajikistan was stressed. To achieve
this objective, Foreign Minister Kozyrev was appointed the President's
Special Representative for Tajikistan and Defence Minister, Grachev was
made responsible for general operational leadership in coordinating all
the forces and hardware involved in carrying out the defense of the Tajik-
Afghan border.
Having set the task for his government, Yeltsin
organised a summit meeting with the Presidents of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan,
Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan at Moscow on August 7, 1993, on the Tajikistan
issue. He stressed the need to "neutralise the growing threat to security
in Central Asia and ensure stability". Yeltsin called upon the leaders
of these states for concrete joint action to reinforce the Russian border
troops in Tajikistan on an equal basis. Four important documents which
were signed by the five CIS states at this conference provided the legal
basis to legitimise direct Russian/CIS role in Tajikistan. These documents
are :-
i) the Declaration on the Inviolability of the
State Borders
ii) Statement on the ways to normalise the
Tajik-Afghan border as part of the common CIS border
iii) Appeal to the UN Secretary General
to take measure against the offensive launched from the territory of Afghanistan
against Tajikistan.
iv) Appeal to leaders of the CIS member
states to discuss the creation of an economic union.
In sum, the basic parameters of Russian policy
in Tajikistan, which is now looked after by a separate Tajikistan Desk
instead of the general Central Asia Section, as it has evolved over the
past two years, are:-
1. Commitment to the inviolability of State borders,
2. To prevent Islamist extremist forces
from Tajikistan and Afghanistan from destabilising the social and political
situation in the CIS.
3. To ensure security of Russian speaking
minorities.
4. Treating the Tajik-Afghan border as the
common CIS border. Hence its protection is to be the joint responsibility
of Russia and adjacent CIS states. A formal agreement was reached by the
Foreign and Defence Ministries of Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan
for the establishment of an allied defence force to ensure security of
the Tajik-Afghan border.
5. Right to retaliate including military
action and hot pursuit of enemy. In July 1993 Russian jet fighters bombed
several villages in northern Afghanistan to eliminate Tajik Islamic militants
who were operating from their bases. It is significant that the Russian
policy in Tajikistan finds an expression in the new Russian military doctrine
which allows stationing of armed forces outside its national territory
to preserve its territorial integrity and that of the CIS, and reserves
the right to nuclear strike against the territory, troops or military targets
of an aggressor country.
6. To encourage Tajik government to expand
its support base within different ethnic groups and clans in Tajikistan
and to have reconciliation with the Tajik opposition leaders.
7. To encourage and organise dialogue between
Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Afghanistan and Russia to seek a solution to the
vexed problem using all available diplomatic means.
MOVES FOR TAJIK AFGHAN DIALOGUE: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS
Occasional contacts have been established between
the Tajik/Russian Border Guards and the Afghan Mujahideen field commanders
controlling the border on the Afghanistan side to resolve the recurrent
problems of arms smuggling, infiltration of armed men or even to secure
the release of captives. But these local contacts failed to bring the desired
improvement in the border situation. The visit of high level Tajik delegation
led by Prime Minister Akbar Mirzoyev to Kabul on July 14, 1992 to seek
the help of new Islamic government of Afghanistan for stopping the Mujahideen
field commanders from supplying arms and ammunition to Tajik militant groups
also proved to be ineffective. The Tajik delegation met the Afghan Prcsident,
Burhanuddin Rabbani and other Afghan leaders including Ahmad Shah Masood.
Though the Afghan leaders shared Tajik concern over the increased border
violations and smuggling of arms, they expressed their inability to exercise
any control over General Latif Ibrahimi, the Afghan commander of rival
Hizb-e-Islami group who has been controlling the Pyandzh border stretch
in Kunduz. Similar opinion was later expressed by Rabbani during his visit
to Tashkent in October ]992 when the Uzbek President raised the issue of
Afghan interference in Tajikistan.
It was in mid-August 1993 that the Afghan Foreign
Minister visited Dushanbe at the invitation of his Tajik counterpart for
talks to settle the vexed border problem, to expedite the process of repatriation
of Tajik refugees from Afghanistan and to prepare the ground for bilateral
summit between the two heads of state of Tajikistan and Afghanistan. The
Dushanbe meeting resulted in a joint communique (issued on August 15, 1993)
which announced the setting up of a trilateral commission comprising representatives
of Afghanistan, Tajikistan and office of the UN Chief Commissioner for
Refugees to assist in the return of Tajik refugees from Afghanistan. Both
sides reposed faith in "principles of independence, sovereignty, territorial
integrity and non-interference in each other's affairs". But the Tajik-Afghan
dialogue was made difficult by the kidnapping of 1 Kazakh and 5 Russian
Border Guards who were taken as hostages to Afghan territory on August
10, 1993. It was no mere coincidence that the border incident occurred
on the same day when Afghan Foreign Minister H. Amin Arsala arrived at
Dushanbe thereby assuming priority in the bilateral dialogue and pushing
substantial issues to the backstage. Obviously the Tajik opposition groups
and their Afghan supporters positioned in northern Afghanistan were seeking
to disrupt the process of direct political dialogue between Tajikistan
and Afghanistan. However, the Tajik government's unilateral decision to
hand over 5 Afghan prisoners as a goodwill gesture to the Afghan authorities
was calculated to pave way for the return of hostages. Notwithstanding
this gesture and the assurance by Afghan Foreign Minister to have the hostages
released soon after his return to Kabul, the Russian and Kazakh Border
Guards continued to be held captive by the Afghan authorities for about
20 days. On one occasion, Gulbadin Hikmatyar, the Prime Minister of Afghanistan
refused to free the CIS Border troops on the plea that the Russian guards
were attacking Tajik refugees on the Afghan territory. The hostages were
finally released on August 31, 1993 when the Tajik Head of State, Rakhmanov
arrived at Kabul to hold discussions with Afghan President, Rabbani. Both
sides discussed the border problem but had to content with the ratification
of earlier decision to create a trilateral commission for looking into
the problems of Tajik refugees. Later Rakhmanov conceded that release of
CIS border guards was "the major result of his visit to Kabul". However,
this visit too was marred by renewed fighting on the border in which one
Russian border guard was killed. This again reflected the rivalry between
different factions of Afghan leadership. The problem is compounded by perceptional
differences as Hikmatyar has been against the "deployment of Russian border
guards along the Tajik-Afghan border". To him this is the mutual concern
of only two states-Afghanistan and Tajikistan.
That there is remote possibility of any peace
process taking off in this region, is indicated by the renewal of intense
fighting in October 1993 on the border and in Pamirs area and another kidnapping
of 3 Russian and 3 Kazakh Border Guards by Tajik/Afghan militants. It has
been viewed as yet another attempt by the Tajik Islamic opposition groups
and their Afghan Mujahideen supporters to disrupt the process of Tajik-Afghan
dialogue and in particular to torpedo the planned return visit of Afghan
President, Rabbani to Tajikistan. However, Rabbani did visit Dushanbe on
December 19,1993 and held talks with Rakhmanov, the Tajik Head of State
on issues of border security and repatriation of refugees. Both leaders
signed a Friendship and Cooperation Treaty, economic and trade accords
and an agreement on border security. However, these conciliatory moves
did not cut ice with the Tajik Islamist leaders, who dismissed it as meaningless.
Tajik Islamic opposition leader, Haji Akbar Turajonzoda also discounted
the possibility of Tajikistan conducting any trade with Afghanistan. The
Afghan Dy. Minister of Planning, D. Mahadi, who had earlier signed the
trilateral agreement on return of Tajik refugees with UNHCR and Tajikistan,
also voiced his disapproval to the presence of CIS forces on the Tajik-Afghan
border. With the escalation of fighting between Hikmatyar and Rabbani factions
in Afghanistan and due to persistent Tajik Islamists' opposition, the Tajik-Afghan
peace moves initiated by Rabbani and Tajik government, are doomed to failure.
CONCLUSION
The crisis in Afghanistan has had a direct impact
on the situation in Tajikistan due to supply of arms and ammunition and
training imparted by the Afghan Mujahideen to Tajik Islamic extremists.
After the demise of Soviet Union narcotics trade in the Golden Crescent
has found yet another lucrative supply route via Pamirs-Tajikistan to the
Commonwealth of Independent States and European countries. The Afghan Mujahideen
have been playing an overt role in subverting the socio-political situation
in Tajikistan to establish an Islamic regime there. The situation gets
further complicated by different Afghan Mujahideen groups exercising control
over different areas in northern Afghanistan who keep on pressing ahead
on the Tajik border regardless of what happens in Kabul.
The hostilities in Tajikistan going on for about
two years now, have already taken a heavy toll of almost one lakh killed
and injured and more than six lakhs rendered homeless. And there is very
little prospect of peace and stability getting restored in the region,
given the belligerent stance adopted by the Tajik Islamist radicals who
have now set up a "Tajik Government in Exile" in Afghanistan. The exchange
of friendly visits by Heads of State of Afghanistan and Tajikistan in late
1993 has not resulted in any let-up in the tension on the Tajik-Afghan
border. The Tajik-Afghan peace process has been marred by Hikmatyar's continued
support to Tajik Islamist extremists and his opposition to the presence
of CIS troops on the border. Though the intensification of bloody fighting
between rival groups led by Rabbani and Hikmatyar has sidelined the Tajikistan
issue for the time being, it has turned the situation murkier. The trans-border
movement of armed Tajik and Afghan Islamist extremists and smuggling of
drugs and arms has been the main source of destabilisation for the entire
Central Asian region.
External factor in Tajikistan's crisis, particularly
the trans-border export of Islamic extremism and terrorism from the direction
of Afghanistan evoked strong reaction from the adjoining Central Asian
States and Russia. Whereas Uzbekistan played a key role in galvanising
opinion against "the advance of Islamic fundamentalists and extremists
forces", Russia has been concerned over the security of ethnic Russian
minorities and the defence of Tajik-Afghanistan border. Though the Russian
official and public opinion, still reeling under the impact of Afghanistan
syndrome, is divided over the ways and means and extent of Russian involvement
in Tajikistan, there is unanimity over the need to keep Islamist extremism
at bay. Russia has outlined its geo-political interests in the region as,
"preserving internal stability in Central Asia, protection of Russian speaking
minorities and preventing Islamic extremism from passing through the Tajik-Afghan
border into the CIS". Conscious of the highly destabilising potential of
the situation and the efforts made at redrawing of borders in this region,
Russia and the adjoining Central Asian states of Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan,
Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan have declared their firm commitment to the "Inviolability
of State Borders". Not only that, Russian jet fighters have on several
occasions bombed the bases of hostile Tajik and Afghan militants in northern
Afghanistan, thereby following the policy of hot pursuit. Given the ground
realities, the CIS peace-keeping forces are bound to stay put to defend
the Tajik-Afghan border.
|