The Legend Called RN Kao
By P.N. Raina
Pt. Rameshwar Nath Kao,
India’s greatest name in
intelligence arena belonged
to the old tradition,
where
spymasters not only were
superbly
dedicated to their
profession
but also hated
sensationalism.
Kao never wrote about
himself,
gave no interviews,
disliked
being photographed or
sharing
secrets of shadowy roles
that
spying job entails. To
reconstruct
his role one has to rely
on
few snippets from
newspapers.
Sh. R.N. Kao at the start of his career.
Kao was decisive, often
ruthless.
Many of the stringent
sleuthing practices
imbibed by
some top officials of RAW
from
their mentor have earned
for them
the epithet of ‘Kaoboys’
In 1982
Count Alexandre de
Marenches,
who headed the
French External
intelligence
agency Service for
External
Documentation and
Counter-Intelligence
or SDECE as it was
then known under President
Valery Giscard d’ estiang,
was
asked by an interlocutor
to name
the five great
intelligence chiefs
of 1970s. Kao whom he knew
well
and admired, was one of
the five
named by him. Marenches
praised the way Kao had
built
up RAW into a professional
intelligence
organisation and made
it play within three years
of its
creation a formidable role
in
changing the face of South
Asia
in 1971.
Link with Colonial
Bureaucracy:
Pt. RN Kao was the first
Hindu
official to join IB in
British India
and gained crucial
insights into
support structures of
British
Colonialism in Indian
society.
Having the privileged
position of
being a link between
Colonial
bureaucracy and post-1947
one
he initiated processes
that undermined
the subversive potential
of the pro-British support
structures. In this
context he was
fully aware how the
British had
cultivated Muslim
communalism
to create cleavages in
India. Kao
also pooh-poohed the view
that
Indian left was an
anti-imperial
force. He opined that
Left’s encouragement
politics, would not
allow Indian nation-state
to
stabilise. Kao also
decried Left’s
hypocrisy-be it
fund-raising or
morality. He attributed
India’s
lack of interest in
‘Look East
Policy’ (ASEAN)
to hangovers
of Colonial past.
Ghana:
Kao proved his brilliance
in
Ghana, where he alongwith
his
deputy K. Sankaran Nair
set up
an intelligence agency at
the request
of legendary President
Kwame NKrumah. Ghana
neither
had resources nor trained
manpower.
‘Kashmir Princess’ case:
Chinese Premier Chou Enlai
was to travel to Bandung
on a
chartered Air India plane
called
‘Kashmir Princess’.
Under
strange circumstances
Chou cancelled
his trip.
Somewhere over
Natuna islands a
bomb exploded,
leading to the air
crash with no survivors.
In view of
the political sensitivity
there were all
sorts of speculation
leading to
conspiracy theories.
Kao was deputed
by Nehru to
investigate the
case. Those were
the days of
‘ Hindi-Chini
Bhai Bhai’. Despite
all sorts of
pressures from the
Chinese side to involve
Taiwanese
government, Kao
withstood pressures.
This enhanced
his prestige
as a thorough
professional.
TECHINT Collection:
In the wake of 1962
debacle
where intelligence failed
to predict
Chinese game-plan in
North-
East and Ladakh, Nehru
sought
American help.
Aviation Research
Centre was the result. In
1963 Kao was put as its
first Director.
It was here he laid the
foundations of TECHINT
Collection
in modern India.
Kao had so impressed the
officers
at the CIA’s New Delhi
station
that one CIA official
recalled
later,
“I had the opportunity to
drive with him from
Kathmandu
back to India. At each
bridge we
crossed, he would recount
its
technical specifications
in comparison
to its ability to support
the heaviest tank in the
Chinese
inventory.”
Punjab:
It is said that Kao tried
to dissuade
Mrs. Gandhi from sending
the army into the Golden
Temple Complex. He wanted
the
job to be done by local
police.
Other accounts suggest
that Kao
and GC Saxsena made
efforts to
secure British assistance
to train
a special unit using
models of
complex at Chakrata.
Before Mrs. Gandhi ordered
the Army to move into the
Temple Complex, she had
engaged
Sikh leaders including
some extremists through
intermediaries.
She wanted a ‘negotiated
solution’. Negotiations in
India
were carried on by Rajiv
Gandhi
and two of his close
associates.
Kao carried on discussions
abroad. Mrs. Gandhi, who
had a
strong sense of history,
wanted
these negotiations to be
recorded
in black and white so that
future generations could
know
how desperately and in
vain she
tried to reach a political
solution.
China:
Kao also attempted to push
through Indo-Chinese talks
by
holding directed
discussions
with Qai Shi, coordinator
of Chinese
intelligence. Just before
his
departure he was asked by
Madam Indira Gandhi what
outcome
he expected. As a true
professional
he said. “I expect very
little, but that I saw no
reason
why we should leave the
field to
Pakistan unchallenged and
not
make even an effort”.
Simla Talks:
Kao Sahib had great regard
for
courage and political will
displayed by Madam Gandhi.
In
his retirement years while
talking
about crossborder
terrorism
launched by Pakistan
against
India Kao would say that
since
Indira Gandhi no leader of
stature had emerged in
India who
could take radical steps
to stamp
out terrorism and change
geography of the region.
However he would wonder
how
even a leader like Indira
Gandhi
could commit mistakes. It
is said
shortly before Simla
talks the Prime
Minister visited RAW
Hqrs to request Kao to
join talks. He refused
saying his going won’t
be proper. Kao stood
silent for a moment.
She said, “What are
you looking at? I know
it is said that after
shaking hands with
ZA Bhutto one has to
check whether all the
five fingers of the hand
were intact’. Kao
would wonder even
then she committed a
mistake. Her all
Kashmiri advisors-PN
Dhar, TN Kaul were
against one sided
concessions to
Pakistan. Only the proleft
PN Haksar wanted
India to surrender its
advantage.
Emergency:
Kao was against
imposition of emergency
in 1975. He had
privately advised Madame
Gandhi against it. When
Mrs.
Gandhi presented the plan
at a
meeting in which top
bureaucrats
were called, Director IB
dissented
and he was removed. Kao
Sahib
repeatedly asked to be
relieved
but was advised to
continue. Incidently,
General TN Raina, then
Army Chief too did not
like declaration
of emergency.
In 1977 after Congress
defeat
Janta Government eyed him
with
suspicion but could find
nothing
against him. Morarji Desai
firmly believed that he
had indulged
in ‘dirty tricks’ on her
behalf.
In a reasonably courteous
encounter with Desai, Kao
denied
all allegations of
partisanship
and wrong-doing point by
point. But the old man was
unconvinced. He ordered a
rigorous,
high level, detailed
enquiry
into Kao’s role. The
spymaster’s role was found
to
be impeccable. Charan
Singh,
then Home Minister
admitted
that
‘Kao was a thorough
professional
to his finger-tips’.
A
man of great integrity,
Kao, however,
insisted on leaving the
office
before the end of his
extended
tenure and left office, in
January 1977. Desai
persisted in
throttling India’s premier
external
intelligence agency by
ordering
massive cuts to the
agency’s
budget and operations.
Kashmir:
About the eruption of
Islamist
insurgency in Kashmir Kao
would list three major
factors.
One, demise of Indira
Gandhi.
According to him it was a
watershed
in destabilization of
Kashmir,
after her there was no
leader
of her stature and
capability. Secondly,
India did not grasp
monumental
implications of Soviet
intervention
in Afghanistan. It had
no assessment about
compulsions
of Soviets nor it made any
effort to study these. He
observed
that India did not realise
then that similar dangers
would
confront India soon. Kao
lamented
that Indians believed
they were immune to the
dangers
posed by intervention and
collaboration
of Saudi Arabia, Iran,
Pakistan and US agencies
in the
region. Third factor,
according to
Kao was the entry of Drug/
Hawala money and Arab
petrodollars
which fomented subversion
and weakened national
response
to security threats.
Kao had intimate knowledge
of men and matters in
Kashmir
even in 1990s when he was
no
longer involved in
country’s affairs.
He was against giving any
concessions to Muslims
communalism,
which he believed extended
beyond separatist
groups. He called Pandits
as ‘salt
of the earth’ and asked them not
to feel demoralized over
failures
or slow pace of events.
Proud Kashmiri Pandit:
Kao Sahib was proud of his
Kashmiri Pandit origins,
not simply
because of ethnic link but
as
heir to the great
civilisation of
Kashmir. He would always
look
for a good Brahimin who
could
perform rituals according
to
Kashmiri Karamkand. He
scoffed
at those who harangued
that
Kashmiri Pandit
bureaucrats had
been imposed from above.
He
would this thinking as
foolish.
Kashmiri Pandits manned
senior
positions in bureaucracy
by virtue
of sheer competence, Kao
would say.
In the wake of terrorism
in
1990 unlike others Kao
expressed
his total solidarity with
Displaced
Pandit Community. It is
said when things worsened
in
early 1990 he had visited
Kashmir
in his private capacity to
see
what could be done to
create
conditions for their
continued
stay of Pandits in
Kashmir. Kao
disliked those who
projected
negative image of the
community.
Kao did not see exodus of
Pandits from Kashmir as an
isolated
event. He saw it as a link
in
the chain of demographic
invasion
India was facing. He
wanted
Pandits to fight back,
even if it
took a century and develop
political
consciousness about the
struggle.
In 1992 Panun Kashmir, the
frontline organisation of
Kashmiri Hindus had
organised
a meeting in New Delhi to
seek
the views of those members
who
had manned senior
positions in
the ruling heirarchy. This
was attended
among others by
Messers SL Shakhdar, RN
Kao,
TN Koul, DN Munshi, Pyare
Lal
Handoo, a senior NC
leader.
When PL Handoo rose up to
make an apologetic
statement to
counter ‘Homeland demand’
and
said “we have to continue
to
suffer for India,” a young
PK
activist countered him,
‘We have
already suffered. Now you
should suffer’. As PL
Handoo
began to leave soon after
making
his speech, having no
courtesy
to listen to the views of
respectable
dignitaries, who had
come to express solidarity
with
Displaced Kashmiris the PK
activists
did not allow him to leave
and asked him to listen to
their
viewpoint as well. TN Koul,
former Foreign Secretary,
accepted
that ‘concept of enclaves’
for Displaced Pandits in
Valley was possible. It
was Pt.
RN Kao’s intervention that
changed the whole
atmosphere.
He exhorted his colleagues
to listen
to younger people, who he
said were speaking sense.
He
argued that without
political
consciousness there could
be no
struggle, and Displaced
Pandits
needed an anchor which
will impart
them political
consciousness.
He reminded the gathering
that India was under a
multi-pronged
assault and
ethnic-cleansing
of Kashmiri Hindus
was a component of the
overall
demographic assault.
Source: Kashmir
Sentinel
|