Question of Kashmir
by T. N. Kaul
In this
extremely well-reasoned article, the author, former Foreign Secretary to
the Govt. of India and an ace diplomat, terms the plight of Kashmiri
Pandit refugees as a threat to the stability, independence, freedom and
integrity of India - Editor. |
I
have returned home to India after visiting various countries for the last three
months. I am disappointed
with the indifference and inaction of our leaders and political parties to some
of the very important matters that are vital to the interest of our country and
the people. The impression abroad seems to be that in spite of rich natural
resources and vast human talents, India is incapable of or unable to solve its
internal problems or deal effectively with external threats.
This may not be wholly true but it is the definite
impression one gets even from the citizens of India abroad because of our
inability to produce results, and even when we do produce results, our inability
to inform, educate or project these in a convincing manner to our own media in
India and to the correspondents of the foreign media. Although we have
diplomatic missions in almost all capitals of the world, and more than 10
million people of Indian origin live abroad and are well off and prosperous, we
seem to be unable to take advantage of these favorable factors to project the
correct image of India.
The most striking example of our failure is the
continuing problem of Kashmir which has been draining our resources ever since
1947, particularly during the past six years since militancy has gained ground
in J&K. People abroad cannot understand why India, which is much bigger than
Pakistan and has greater political stability and military strength, cannot deal
effectively with a few thousand infiltrators who have been crossing the Line of
Control, agreed to by both sides at the Simla Conference in 1972, with impunity.
They ask how a smaller country like Pakistan can get away with its cheap proxy
war and involve more than 500 thousand Indian military and para-military forces
in J&K without any appreciable improvement in the situation on the ground:
They wonder how a few foreign mercenaries trained and armed by Pakistan along
with a few local misguided malcontents could dare to threaten the holy shrine at
Hazratbal and, when they failed there, to burn the Sufi shrine respected by both
Muslims and non-Muslims at Chrar-e-Sharief. They further ask why India is
hesitant to use its armed forces to pursue the militants who are holding the
four foreign hostages and who have already killed one Norwegian. They ask why
the Indian security forces could not pursue these terrorists, particularly after
they beheaded the unfortunate innocent Norwegian tourist. They say that India
would have had the full sympathy and understanding of the whole world if it had
taken action against the militants either before or even immediately after lhe
beheading of the Norwegian.
Many Indian writers, including myself, have been
trying to impress on the corridors of power in India the urgent need to warn
Pakistan, not in mere words but by serious action, that the terrorist training
camps in occupied Kashmir or elsewhere are a direct violation of international
law and the UN Charter as well as the Simla Agreement, and any interference in
or aggression on Kashmir will be considered as aggression against India. Such a
warning was issued by Lal Bahadur Shastri in 1965 and had its effect on
Pakistan. A similar action in 1971 by Indira Gandhi was even more effective. Why
is it that for the past six years we have not issued any serious warning to
Pakistan and followed it up with action in order to deter the interference and
aggression on the state of J&K, particularly on the Indian side of the Line
of Control.
No one abroad will give any credence to our side of
the story, however true it may be, unless we follow it up with successful
action. The fear in some circles that this may provoke Pakistan into launching a
war against India is not only unjustified but is also a sign of weakness and
vacillation on the part of the powers that be. In the first place, arler its
utter defeat in 1971 Pakistan's military would not be so foolhardy as to embark
on another military misadventure against India. The present military leaders in
Pakistan are, I hope, more sensible and realistic than some of the politicians
who, for internal purposes, are fond of issuing constant threats to India both
in their national Press and international forums.
I am disappointed and shocked at the weak, timid
and defensive attitude that we always adopt in replying to Pakistan's unfounded
charges against India. Instead of dealing firmly with the violation of human
rights by the militants in Kashmir, who are financed, trained and equipped by
the state- terrorism and aggressive policy of Pakistan, we are not even giving
any help or succour to the more than 3,00,000 Kashmiri Pandits and over 50,000
Muslims and Sikhs who have been forced to flee the valley at the point of the
terrorist's gun. Why is it that the Indian security forces are unable to pursue
these terrorists and capture them redhanded and prevent their infiltration
across the Line of Control ? I cannot believe that our security forces are
incapable of doing this. They are second to none in their efficiency and
training. Perhaps they are not given clear and firm directives by the civil and
political leaders, or is it that the latter are sabotaging the action because of
vested interests, bribery and corruption that have crept into the civil
administration?
It is shocking that, in spite of a unanimous
resolution on J&K by our Parliament, no effective action has been taken so
far to implement it. There is a national consensus among all political parties
that J&K is an integral part of India and must remain so. If any part of
J&K is allowed or encouraged to separate from India on grounds of religion
or otherwise, it will be the beginning of dismemberment of the whole country.
Not only that, it will also lead to the dismemberment of Pakistan, which has at
least half a dozen ethnic and religious sectarian groups. What is more, it could
lead to a bloodbath on religious lines and the migration of hundreds of millions
of people in the whole subcontinent and its neighbourhood if religion or
ethnicity is allowed to be the determining factor for secession.
India has a strong case on Kashmir on grounds of
history, culture, ethnicity and ideology. But unless India is able to deal
effectively and successfully against internal and external threats, it will not
be able to convince the rest of the world about its case. It must strengthen its
concept of secular democracy, by providing full protection and freedom to all
minorities in every nook and corner of India irrespective of creed, caste or
gender. The plight of the refugees from Kashmir or the internally displaced
persons, who are living under subhuman conditions without adequate facilities in
regard to security, health, hygiene, education or employment, is a blot on the
Government and people of India. It is not merely a question of 3,00,000 poor
unfortunate Indian citizens who have been forced to flee their hearths and homes
at the point of the gun. It is a threat to the culture and ideals of humanism,
mutual respect and tolerance, and to the stability, independence, freedom and
integrity of the whole country.
It is time our leaders woke up to this serious
threat and, instead of merely talking about it, did something concrete and
substantial to remove the threat. If India continues merely to complain and
whine, the rest of the world is not likely to take it seriously.
The time for action is now and world opinion is
favourably inclined towards India's case provided New Delhi is able to
effectively and successfully deal with both its internal and external problems.
No government or political party in a democratic India will be able to stay in
power for a single week if it does not seriously consider the threat to the
whole country involved in J&K.
Let this be a warning to all political parties to
do something collectively and not merely indulge in mutual bickerings and
throwing mud at each other. What is involved is not the prestige or influence or
success or failure of one political party or the other but of the country as a
whole.
[ Courtesy: The Tribune, Chandigarh,
Nov. 11,1995]
Source: Koshur Samachar
|