Kashmir Facts to
Dismantle Pakistani Disinformation
by Keshav Dev Sharma
People for United India represents over
800,000 persons of Indian origin living in the United States. Over 30 cultural
and ethnic organizations have joined together to support the effort for bringing
an end to terrorism and promote peace in Kashmir.
For further
information about People For United India, please contact Dr. Ram Gehani at
(301) 340-1385.
Facts At A Glance
* Kashmir is, and
always has been, an integral part of India. Kashmir was never divided by the
British. It acceded to India by an Instrument of Accession in 1947 which is
recognized valid under international law.
* India is a secular
democracy. India has more Muslims than Pakistan, and minorities in India enjoy
incomparable privileges. Two of India's seven Presidents have been Muslims.
* Pakistan has behaved
like a terrorist state. It sent tribal raiders into Kashmir in 1947 and occupied
1/3rd of the state. It again trained, armed, and infiltrated
fundamentalist-terrorists in 1965, 1971 and in 1989-90.
* Pakistan never
complied with UN resolution requiring it to withdraw from Kashmir and to hand
over entire territory back to India which was a prerequisite to any plebiscite
in Kashmir. Since then there have been several elections in the state of Jammu
and Kashmir on the basis of universal suffrage.
*Under the Simla
Agreement of 1972, India and Pakistan are required to refrain from use of force
and to sort out bilateral issues by negotiations and not by internationalization
of the issue, and as such the UN has no jurisdiction on Kashmir. President Bush
has also called for negotiations under Simla Agreement.
* The United States
has identified JKLF and Hezbullah as terrorist organizations. These
organizations have been engaging in arson, kidnappings, murders and rioting in
Kashmir. As a result more than 140,000 Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims have fled
Kashmir as refugees.
* Pakistan is using
American arms meant for Afghani Mujahideens to train and arm terrorists. World
media has reported that there are at least 63 terrorist training camps in
Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
THE Kashmir issue in
the last few months has disturbed all peace loving people around the world.
Terrorist activities, kidnappings and killings of the innocents have virtually
turned this beautiful valley into another seriously troubled spot.
U.S. citizens, who
believe firmly in the principles of secularism and democracy and uphold the
international law of sovereignty and integrity of nations, are especially
shocked.
India is confronted
with an unprecedented crisis of armed subversion by secessionists, terrorists
and Islamic fundamentalist forces getting help from Pakistan with the declared
object of secession of Kashmir from India. This is not only a grave threat to
the territorial integrity of a country but an open challenge to the state
authority and validity of the principles of democracy and secularism that we all
cherish.
The root cause is the
ongoing conspiracy of Pakistan to grab forcibly Jammu and Kashmir from India.
Over the past many years, Pakistan has engaged in inciting religious frenzy
among the Muslims in the Kashmir valley and supplying them with all sorts of
sophisticated arms to wage a 'jihad' against India.
Their main targets of
this armed insurgency are the security forces maintaining law and order in the
state as also Hindus and other religious minorities. This has caused the
greatest refugee migration in recent Indian history. More than 140,000 members
of Hindus, Sikhs and other minority communities have fled the Kashmir valley.
The militants are
running a campaign of terror in the valley by indulging in arson, kidnapping,
bombings, murders and religious blandishment. This Pakistan- sponsored
international terrorism has been targeting victims that include not only ordinary
citizens but also top personalities in academic, journalistic and government
echelons.
Since the United
States provides military aid and sophisticated weapons to Pakistan, it is
shocking to most U.S. citizens to learn how our hard earned tax money is being
used to support the Pakistani government that sponsors and supports terrorism,
preaches religious fundamentalism and is officially involved in drug
trafficking. This is all the more agonizing when the elimination of drug
trafficking, terrorism, and preaching of religious fundamentalism is top on the
United States' agenda. The Islamic Republic of Pakistan is one of the largest recipients
of U.S. foreign military aid. This aid has been given to Pakistan
for the ostensible purpose of deterring Soviet aggression. Since 1981 Pakistan
has been provided with $1.5 billion in renewed aid and another $1.4 billion is
scheduled for delivery by 1991, including 60 F-16 fighter aircrafts in addition
to 40 already supplied. Nominally for use against Soviet forces, this weaponry
has almost all been deployed along the Indian frontier.
Evidence obtained by
American intelligence sources proves beyond any doubt that Pakistan has trained
hundreds and thousands of terrorists and has smuggled them into the valley along
with arms and ammunition including rockets and Kalashnikov rifles from the
United States.
Kashmir is, and
always has been, an integral part of India
Contrary to
tendentious references in the Pakistani disinformation campaign, Jammu and
Kashmir has historically been an integral part of India. Way back in the third
century B.C., Emperor Asoka introduced Buddhism into Kashmir, and ever since
whenever a major political force unified India, its sway always extended to
Kashmir. For centuries, Kashmir has been a part of India's cultural mosaic and
remains so.
When India became
independent on August 15,1947, Kashmir was one of the princely states which had
not acceded to either India or Pakistan. Under Partition Agreements, princely
states were to accede, after the lapse of British Paramountcy, to one of the two
Dominions of India and Pakistan by executing Instrument of Accession. In October
1947, the Pakistani Government aided and abetted a massive tribal invasion of
the state. The ruler of Kashmir asked the Government of India for military aid
and acceded to India on October 26, 1947; the Indian Government accepted the
Instrument of Accession and dispatched troops to repel the invasion. The
accession of Jammu and Kashmir to the Indian Union in 1947 is valid, final and
entirely consistent with the Partition Agreements. Its legality is beyond any
dispute. It was also buttressed by popular support as evident from the fact that
the main political party of the State, the National Conference led by Sheikh
Abdullah, whole- heartedly supported the accession to India and in fact
organized a Defense Army to fight along with the Indian forces.
Recorded evidence
shows that the Indian leadership was always prepared to apply the same set of
principles to Kashmir as it was advocating to other States at the time of
partition of India by the British in 1947. The principle was: the ruler of the
state should accede to one of the two dominions. Kashmir was never divided by
the British and Lord Mountbatten, the-then British Governor General of India,
had assured the Maharajah of Kashmir that if his choice were to be for Pakistan,
the Indian Government would not object to accession of Kashmir to Pakistan. As
reported by Rajendra Sareen in his book 'Pakistan: the India Factor' Pakistan's
Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan immediately rejected this saying, "Have you
gone out of your mind? Why should we leave a province larger than Punjab
(referring to Nizam's Hyderabad) and settle for some mountain rocks?"
Kashmir acceded to India - technically, legally, morally and under every known
and acceptable tenets of international law.
Pakistani strategy to
grab Kashmir by force
However, Pakistani
strategy was to get Kashmir by trickery and force, even while attempting to
support Nizam' s efforts to become independent and sovereign. It is no longer
deniable that the Govemment of Pakistan initiated the attack on Kashmir in
October 1947. Mr. Jinnah later offered to Lord Mountbatten to pull out the
Pathans if the Indian troops were removed. Philip Ziegler's biography of
Mountbatten (Mountbatten) and Stanley Wolpert's biography of Mr. Jinnah (Jinnah
of Pakistan) record Mr. Jinnah admitting that on October 23,1947, trucks and
jeeps of the Pakistani Army loaded with some 5,000 armed Pathan, Afridi, Waziri
and Mahsur tribesmen of the Northwest Frontier crossed the Kashmir border.
That Pakistani
Generals had been dreaming of seizing Kashmir is evident further from the
conversations recorded between Professor Cohen of the University of Illinois and
Pakistani officers during his visit to the country in 1980, and reported in his
paper "Nuclear issues and security policy in Pakistan," presented at
the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Asian Studies, Washington, March
1980.
Why no plebiscite in
Kashmir
Pakistan's tirade
against India revolves around certain UN resolution concerning demilitarization
and plebiscite in Jammu and Kashmir. Pakistanis have been propagating that India
had failed to fulfill the UN resolution. The facts are quite to the contrary. It
is Pakistan that has never fulfilled its obligations under the UN resolutions.
It was India which
took the question of invasion of Kashmir to the UN Security Council,
Deliberations in the Security Council led to the establishment of the United
Nations Commission for India and Pakistan (UNCIP). The UNCIP resolution of
August 13,1948, accepted by both Pakistan and India, provided for (I) a
ceasefire; (II) a Truce Agreement which directed Pakistan to withdraw all its
forces from the territory of State of Jammu and Kashmir, and (III) only
thereafter ascertaining of the will of the people of the State in a peaceful
manner. (See Appendix I for text of the UN resolution of August 13,1948).
The UN resolutions
were accepted by India subject to assurances given by UNCIP, which, inter-alia,
stipulated: a) plebiscite proposals would not be binding on India if Pakistan
did not implement parts I and II of UNCIP resolution of August 13, 1948
(mandating ceasefire and withdrawal of Pakistani troops from Pakistan Occupied
Kashmir); b) no recognition would be afforded to thc so-callcd Azad Kashmir
Government; and c) the sovereignty of J & K Government would not be brought
into question over territory vacated by Pakistani troops.
Though the ceasefire
came into effect on January 1, 1949, Pakistan failed to implement part (II) of
the UNCIP resolution. The failure to hold a plebiscite was entirely the result
of Pakistan's default to carry out, within a reasonable time, the obligations
imposed upon her by the UN resolutions, as conditions precedent for holding a
plebiscite. Subsequently, the international context has changed completely.
Accession of J & K to the Indian Union has been confirmed by an elected J
& K Constituent Assembly. A number of elections have also been held at the
national, state and local levels and the people of the State have repeatedly and
freely exercised their democratic choice. Any talk of plebiscite is obviously
meaningless. The only issue which remains to be settled is vacation by Pakistan
of its illegal occupation of parts of J & K.
In other words, it is
Pakistan which has been guilty of not carrying out its obligations under the
first and basic resolution of the UN. The Chairman of the UNCIP in his letter
dated 25th August 1948 to the Prime Minister of India clarified that evacuated
territory in Part II A-3 of the resolution referred to those territories in the
State of Jammu and Kashmir which were then under the effective control of the
Pakistan High Command.
Justice Sir Owen Dixon
(of Australia) in September 1950 came to the conclusion that a wholesale
plebiscite was neither desirable nor possible. He recommended compartmental
plebiscite which India was prepared to examine but which Pakistan rejected. Mr.
Gunnar Jarring (of Sweden) in 1957 said in his report that one cannot hold India
to the plebiscite promise after such a long delay caused mostly by Pakistan's
unwillingness to implement Parts A and B of the UN resolution of August 1948.
India-Pakistan Simla
Accord of 1972
The 1972 Simla
Agreement between India and Pakistan stated with reference to Jammu and Kashmir:
"In Jammu and Kashmir, the line of control resulting from the cease-fire of
December 17, 1971 shall be respected by both sides without prejudice to the
recognized position of either side. Neither side shall seek to alter it
unilaterally irrespective of mutual differences and legal interpretations. Both
sides further undertake to refrain from the threat or the use of force in
violation of this line."
The Simla Agreement
does not permit taking any bilateral differences to international fora without
mutual agreement. Despite this commitment, however, Pakistan has repeatedly
sought to internationalize this issue.
UN has no
jurisdiction on Kashmir
While even the very
dubious case Pakistan makes out on Kashmir has no locus standi in the eyes of
international law and civilized conduct, one can as well question whether the UN
has any jurisdiction over the Kashmir issue. Pakistan in Simla in 1972 has
already agreed to a line of control different from the one arrived at in 1949 as
a result of UN mediation. The principle issue therefore today is only concerning
the modalities of withdrawal of Pakistani forces from Pakistan-occupied Kashmir
and bringing the evacuated territory under the jurisdiction or Srinagar
administration.
The sinister role of
Pakistan
In the garb of
projecting the human rights of the Muslims, Pakistan has launched a
disinformation campaign on the Kashmir issue to confuse and mislead the people,
Congressmen, Senators and government of the United States. However, it is not
too difficult to see that Pakistani misrepresentation of the historical and
legal facts in this matter is in reality a cover-up of Pakistan's own status as
a belligerent terrorist state which supports international terrorism and facts
about which are easily verifiable.
Although Pakistanis
portray trouble in Kashmir as a local uprising and although they brazenly deny
their involvement, there is plenty of evidence to prove that Pakistan has been
meddling in the affairs of Kashmir, training and arming subversives, sending
terrorists and raiders, and fomenting religious and communal disharmony in
India. The following few examples, from Pakistan's track record as a terrorist
state merit consideration to highlight Pakistan's unscrupulous and uncivilized
conduct.
Air Marshal Asghar
Khan, the former Chief of Air Staff of Pakistan and Mr. Altaf Gauhar, the former
Secretary in Pakistan's Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, say in the
book The First Round that "Operation Gibraltar" (the Pakistani raid in
Kashmir in 1965) was deliberately planned by Pakistan. This is confirmed by
General Mohamad Musa, then Chief of Army Staff of Pakistan Army in his book 'My
Version'.
Having twice failed to
achieve their purpose by sending in terrorists and raiders into Kashmir and
calling them the sons of the soil Pakistan government is once again resorting to
the same kind of tactics.
Pakistani modus
operandi is consistent. When they think the Government of India is weak and
indecisive, they send terrorists and raiders into Kashmir and deny it and allege
that they are local people. In October 1947 they presumably thought that with a
British Governor-General and British officers at the helm of affairs and beset
with problems of refugees and integration of states, India would not react if
they sent in raiders into Kashmir. In 1965 Field Marshal Ayub Khan perhaps felt
that a puny Lal Bahadur Shastri, who was described as "prisoner of
indecision" in the Indian Parliament and a demoralized Indian army in the
wake of 1962 debacle in the Northeast would not strike back. Similarly in
December 1970-March 1971 with a minority Indian Government preoccupied with
elections and with a woman Prime Minister in charge, General Yahya Khan
unleashed his genocide in East Bengal presumably hoping that India would not be
able to act. In 1989-90 once again, with a minority government in charge in
Delhi and India having difficult problems in Punjab, Pakistan is inducting
terrorists and raiders in Kashmir.
Pakistan's training
of terrorists
In an article entitled
Sparks of War in Kashmir (The Washington Post, April 23, 1990) reputed
international analyst Selig S. Harrison of the Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace, writes that "Pakistan has precipitated the present war
psychosis by escalating insurgent activity in Indian border areas." Mr.
Harrison says, "Pakistani stimulation of the Punjab insulgency goes back to
the beginnings of the Zia ul Haq regime in 1978. By 1984, the Pakistan Army's
Field Intelligence Unit was helping to organize the Liberation Front in the
Indian-held Kashmir Valley. By 1988, the Interservices Intelligence Directorate
(ISI) in Islamabad had begun to set up training camps in Pakistani held Azad
Kashmir manned by retired Pakistan Army officers. Evidence obtained in Pakistan
as well as from Indian and American intelligence sources indicates that some 63
Pakistan-operated camps have been functioning at various times during the past
two years, roughly half located in Azad Kashmir and half in Pakistan. At least
l1 have operated continuously. Captured agents and guerrillas have provided
detailed evidence showing that Pakistan has trained hundreds of guerrilla
leaders and has smuggled more than 600 weapons into the valley, including rocket
launchers and Kalashnikov rifles from U.S.-supplied Afghan aid stockpiles. Some
of the captured guerrillas include Afghans who are members of the ISI-sponsored
Hezbe Islami."
Mr. Harrison adds,
"Spearheaded by military hard-liners and Islamic fundamentalist groups,
opponents of Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto are seeking to use the Kashmir issue
to drive her from power. If she even questions ISI support for the insurgent,
she is reviled as betraying Moslem freedom fighters. But if she joins the holy
war chorus, as she has begun to do, she fans the fires of a war in which
military leaders would quickly demand full control."
The 'Guardian' of
London on May 1 and 2, 1990 in reports from Pakistan states that the president
of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, Sardar Abdul Qayyum, has accused the Jammu and
Kashmir Liberation Front of containing "terrorist elements." "The
accusation," says the Guardian, "would seem to put him in agreement
with the Indian government." The Guardian points out that "three
thousand young JKLF militants have crossed the border into Pakistan in recent
months, and, according to reports shown on British and American television,
established training camps in Pakistan's Azad Kashmir state. The organization
has until now been well supported by the Pakistan government, which last week
protested on learning the news that the US State Department planned to revoke
the visa of Amanullah Khan, the leader of the JKLF, Mr. Khan is already banned
from entering Britain." The Guardian also reports that the riverside town
of Muzaffarabad in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir is the launching pad from which the
terrorists conduct their activities against the Indian army. Says the Guardian
reporter Kathy Evans, "One Kashmiri leader, Raja Muzaffar showed me
crumpled receipts for 2.5 million rupees (30,000) for guns he bought a fortnight
ago from arms dealers in Pakistan's tribal belt. The bill included 900 for
transporting the weapons to Srinagar. The group appears to be providing basic
military training to the fresh recruits who make their way each day through
Indian army lines. Pakistani officials, as they have for the last 11 years in
Afghanistan, deny any involvement in training and weapons procurement."
On April 30,1990 a BBC
TV report from Pakistan-occupied Kashmir gave details of the supply of arms and
training to those who have crossed from the Indian side of the border.
Pakistan's role as a conduit for arms supply was highlighted, with one extremist
showing the receipt for the purchase and transport of arms.
Details of
Pakistan-operated training camps for both Khalistani and J&K Liberation
Front terrorists have been repeatedly provided to the Government of Pakistan. In
one instance in Punjab alone, Indian security forces recovered 28 rocket
launchers, 229 rockets and missiles, 276 AK 47 rifles, 83 rifles, l84 double-barelled
guns, 469 pistols, 166 revolvers, 300 hand-grenades, 103 bombs, 55
detonators,100 kgs of explosive materials, and 67,331 cartridges - all of
Pakistani origin. But the Pakistanis brazenly deny their involvement. In view of
the massive evidence available to the world community the Pakistani denial,
however, has no credibility.
United States
identifies JKLF as Pakistan-sponsored terrorist organization
The JKLF has been
identified as a terrorist organization by the U.S. Department of State in its
Country Report on Human Rights Practices for l989. The JKLF leader Amanullah
Khan travels on Pakistani passport and operates from Pakistan. He had openly
issued instructions during the terrorist operation involving the kidnapping of
Dr. Rubiya Saeed, the daughter of the Indian Home Minister. He has admitted
sending commandos into Kashmir. While in New York in April he used American soil
to order execution of hostages taken by JKLF terrorists in Kashmir. On April 18,
l990, the State Department revoked the US visa of Amanullah Khan because of
"his support for terrorist acts." Khan, who is already banned from
entering the United Kingdom, then fled the United States, back to Pakistan.
In recent months the
JKLF and other terrorist groups in Jammu and Kashmir have stepped up their
violent activities. More than 100 innocent people have been killed in terrorist
violence and nearly 30,000 families have been forced to leave the Valley. The
terrorists burst into the home of Sheikh Abdul Jabbar, a senior Kashmiri
politician and a former minister, and shot him. On April 6, Prof. Mushir- ul-Haq,
an eminent Islamic scholar and Vice-Chancellor of Kashmir University, his
private secretary and General Manager of Hindustan Machine Tools ,were abducted
by JKLF terrorists, who demanded release of three terrorists. As the Government
refused to succumb to this demand, the three hostages were killed in cold blood.
On April 13, at least six persons died in a bomb explosion in a bus in Delhi.
JKLF claimed credit for this bomb blast. On April 11, Kashmiri terrorists
planted a bomb on a Bombay commuter train, injuring over 40 persons. These
terrorists have also targeted journalists. On February 13, Lassa Kaul, Head of
Srinagar TeleYision was assassinated by JKLF terrorists. On April 29, the
well-known Kashmiri poet and broadcaster Sarwanand Koul 'Premee' and his son
were abducted by terrorists. Their bodies were found on May 2. JKLF and other
Pakistan-controlled terrorist groups have unleashed a campaign of assassinations
targeting moderate political figures and intimidation and killings directed
against Hindus, Sikhs and nationalist Muslims. As a result over 30,000 Hindu,
Sikh and Muslim families have been forced to flee the Valley and take refuge in
Jammu and other parts of India. According to Reuters, a Pakistan-controlled
terrorist group in Kashmir claimed credit for fires and other subversive
activities which destroyed over 100 school buildings in Kashmir and India's
premier conference center in New Delhi. Several security personnel have been
killed in ambushes by these terrorists armed with sophisticated weapons supplied
by Pakistan.
Pakistani Prime
Minister and the Punjab Chief Minister are vying with each other in raising
funds to support the terrorists who have perpetrated the murders of Kashmir's TV
Station Director Mr. Lassa Kaul, the former Member of Kashmir Legislative
Assembly Mir Mustapha, the Vice Chancellor of Kashmir University, the General
Manager of the Hindustan Machine Tools, and numerous others.
Pakistan is a
terrorist state
By the standards set
by the United States, Pakistan is a terrorist state. If India were to go by the
norms adopted by the US and supported by Western European countries India has
every right to retaliate against the bases of terrorism and the country that
sponsors the terrorism.
Pakistan has 10
Noriegas officially drug trafficking
In addition to this
"official" terrorist-state status, Pakistan is heavily involved in
drug trafficking. The U.S. government, according to a report published in The
Washington Post of May 13, 1990, has for several years received reports of
heroin trafficking by Afghan guerrillas and Pakistani military officers. U.S.
Assistant Secretary Levitsky found it necessary to warn the Pakistani officials
about their drug trafficking operations. Officers of Pakistan's Inter-Services
Intelligence (ISI) protect and participate in the trafficking, according to the
sources interviewed by 'The Washington Post' in Pakistan and Washington. The
Washington Post says, "The ISI runs laboratories in south-western Pakistan
buying raw opium gum brought over the border from Afghanistan and cooking it
down into morphine and then heroin. The heroin is smuggled out via Pakistani
airports and ports - mostly those of the city of Karachi." Because of
Pakistan's official sponsorship of drug trafficking the drug barons are able to
flaunt their wealth and influence in Muslim Pakistan whereas severe penalties
are imposed on drug traffickers in Muslim Iran. 'The Post' quotes Selig S.
Harrison, a senior analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in
Washington, saying that involvement in drug corruption extends beyond ISI and
throughout the military structure, which rivals Bhutto for effective control in
Pakistan. "You have about 10 Noriegas... very high up in the (Pakistani)
military," says Mr. Harrison.
Pakistan misusing
American weaponry
Unfortunately, this
drug trafficking, sanctioning and export of terrorism is taking place at the
expense of the American taxpayer. The arms supplied to Pakistan in support of
our foreign policy objective to counter the Soviet invasion in Afghanistan have
been diverted by Pakistan to cause instability in the state of Jammu and
Kashmir. Pakistan is not only misusing Americans' generosity but it is using
American arms to unleash a reign of terror and violence and inflict pain and
suffering upon innocent citizens in the Kashmir valley.
Mr. Selig Harrison in
his April 23 article in The Washington Post points out that Pakistan has been
misusing American weaponry supplied to Pakistan for use against Soviet forces in
Afghanistan. "This weaponry," he writes, "has almost all been
deployed along the Indian frontier."
Pakistan 's massacre
of its own Muslim citizens
For strange and
totally untenable reasons, Pakistan portrays itself as a champion of the Muslims
in the Indian subcontinent. But after secession of Bangladesh from Pakistan in
1971 Pakistan cannot claim that it represents or ever represented a homeland for
Muslims. Today Bangladesh and India have more Muslims than Pakistan. Nobody has
forgotten the genocide in East Bengal in which Pakistanis killed their fellow
Muslim citizens with unprecedented ferocity. Moreover, by rejecting to take back
the Bihari Muslims of Bangladesh who were Pakistani citizens, Pakistan has
betrayed the trust of its own Muslim citizens.
Exemplary secular
record of India and the US
India and the United
States are recognized the world over not only as democracies worthy of emulation
but also as truly secular nations. Like the United States, national elections
take place in India periodically as provided under its Constitution with a large
percentage of voter participation and the incumbent governments were replaced
in 1977, 1979 and 1989 through parliamentary elections. Many state governments
changed many times over through state assembly elections. In Kashmir, the most
recent state elections were held in 1987 and parliamentary elections in 1989.
Similarly and incontrovertibly, India, like the U.S., has the world's best
record as a secular nation not only since gaining independence in 1947 but in
its entire recorded history of over 8,000 years. Its history testifies that
Judaism, Zoroastrianism and Christianity (while being persecuted elsewhere) were
welcomed to India with open arms and they have flourished in its system of
religious freedom. Indian civilization is intrinsically secular and most Indians
are born and raised in this tradition of plurality, secularism and
broad-mindedness. Any charge of religious discrimination or violation of human
rights on grounds of one's religious preference should, therefore, be dismissed
as false and facetious since nowhere in the world religious minorities enjoy so
much privilege and recognition as in India. In a country where more than 85
percent of its citizens are Hindus, out of a total of seven, two of India's
presidents have been Muslims and one Sikh. The commander of Indian forces in
Kashmir as also India's Home Minister and India's Ambassador to the United
States are Muslims. Nobel Peace Prize winner Mother Teresa, a Christian, lives
in India and she will testify that she commands respect of the people in a truly
historical sense.
India has more Muslims
than Pakistan. Unlike Pakistan, where Ahmadiyas, Hindus and Christians face
discrimination and are object of harassment (U.S. Department of State Report,
1989), India treats its minorities equally and even provides them special
privileges. A band of fundamentalist Muslims in Kashmir supported by Pakistan
and other fundamentalist Islamic organizations spread across the world are bent
upon threatening the territorial integrity of India and destroy its secular
character. If fundamentalists succeed in achieving their goal, the country's
unity will be threatened and a process of disintegration may start in the
largest democracy of the world.
U.S. military aid to
Pakistan does not make sense
President Bush has
recently stated that "We continue to support the Simla Agreement of 1972 as
the best framework for a peaceful resolution of the dispute, and we call on both
India and Pakistan to begin bilateral talks without preconditions." India
has stated more than once that it is willing to negotiate with Pakistan under
the Simla Agreement. But Pakistan not only attempts to internationalize the
dispute but it has openly talked about a "thousand-year war" and
supported terrorism and violence in the Kashmir valley.
As long as the U.S.
government supports Pakistan with generous military aid and Pakistan views its
strategy of causing subversion and insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir working in
its favor, it has no incentive to negotiate with India. Only the United States
can, by discontinuing military aid, exert pressure on Pakistan for it to stop
all aid and training to terrorists and to hold talks with India. Since the
threat of Cold War is receding, as President Gorbachev has pointed out in his
recent visit to the U.S., there is no need for continued support of Pakistan
with arms supplies. While the administration and Congress are debating cutbacks
in U.S. defense budget, it does not appear to make any sense to continue
military aid to Pakistan.
Appeal to World
Conscience
The PEOPLE FOR UNITED
INDIA appeal to world conscience and to the people of the United States and
particularly its government to come forward to India's assistance. It urges U.S.
Congress to stop immediately military aid to Pakistan and save U.S. taxpayers'
dollars. We appeal to all peace loving citizens around the world to exert their
pressure on their elected representatives to take stern action against Pakistani
terrorism so that peace in the South Asian subcontinent is not disturbed.
Appendix I
Text of United
Nations Resolution of 13th August, 1948.
The first and the only
UN resolution India accepted is the one adopted by the United Nations Commission
for India and Pakistan (UNCIP) at its 40th meeting on 13th August 1948. Part II
of the resolution reads as follows:
"l. As the
presence of troops of Pakistan in the territory of the State of Jammu and
Kashmir constitutes a material change in the situation since it was represented
by the Government of Pakistan before the Security Council, the Government of
Pakistan agrees to withdraw its troops from that State.
"2. The Government
of Pakistan will use its best endeavor to secure the withdrawal from the State
of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistani nationals not normally resident
therein who have entered the State for the purpose of fighting.
"3. Pending a
final solution, the territory evacuated by the Pakistani troops will be
administered by the local authorities under the surveillance of the
Commission."
Part II B .1 of the
resolution lays down in following terms the total withdrawal of Pakistani forces
from the State of Jammu and Kashmir and thereafter withdrawal of bulk but not
all Indian forces from J&K.
" 1. When the
Commission shall have notified the Government of India that the tribesmen and
Pakistani nationals referred to in Part II A.2 hereof have withdrawn, thereby
terminating the situation which was represented by the Government of India to
the Security Council as having occasioned the presence of Indian forces in the
State of Jammu and Kashmir, and further that the Pakistani forces are being
withdrawn from the State of Jammu and Kashmir, the Government of India agrees to
begin to withdraw the bulk of its forces from that State in stages to be agreed
upon with the Commission.
"2. Pending the
acceptance of the conditions for a final settlement of the situation in the
State of Jammu and Kashmir, the Indian Government will maintain within the lines
existing at the moment of the cease-fire the minimum strength of its forces
which in agreement with the Commission are considered necessary to assist local
authorities in the observance of law and order. The Commission will have
observers stationed where it deems necessary."
Media Assessment
The Washington
Post, April 23, 1990
"Pakistan
has precipitated the present war psychosis by escalating insurgent activity in
Indian border areas... Pakistani stimulation of insurgency goes back to the
beginnings of the Zia Ul Haq regime in l978. By l984, the Pakistan Army's Field
Intelligence Unit was helping lo organize the Liberation Front in the
Indian-held Kashmlr Valley. By 1988, the Interservices Intelligence Directorate
(ISI) in Islamabad had begun to set up training camps in Pakistani-held Azad
Kashmir manned by retired Pakistan Army officers. Evidence obtained in Pakistan
as well as from Indian and American intelligence sources indicates that some 63
Pakistan-operated camps have been functioning at various times during the past
two years, roughly half located in Azad Kashmir and half in Pakistan. At least
11 have operated continuously. Captured agents and guerrillas have provided
detailed evidence showing that Pakistan has trained hundreds of guerrilla
leaders and has smuggled more than 600 weapons into the valley, including rocket
launchers and Kalashnikov rifles from U.S.-supplied Afghan aid stockpiles."
*********************************************
The Guardian, of
London, May 1 & 2, 1990
"...three
thousand young JKLF militants have crossed the border into Pakistan in recent
months, and...established training camps in Pakistan's Azad Kashmir state. The
organization has until now been well supported by the Pakistan government, which
last week protested on learning the news that the US State Department planned to
revoke the visa of Amanullah Khan, the leader of JKLF. Mr. Khan is already
banned from entering Britain... ...One Kashmiri leader, Raja Muzaffar showed me
crumpled receipts for 2.5 million rupees (30,000) for guns he bought a fortnight
ago from arms dealers in Pakistan's tribal belt. The bill included 900 for
transporting the weapons to Srinagar.
*********************************************
BBC TV, April 30,
1990
broadcast a report
from Pakistan-occupied Kashmir giving details of the supply of arms and training
to those who have crossed from the Indian side of the border . Pakistan's role
as a conduit for arms supply was highlighted, with one extremist showing the
receipt for the purchase and transport of arms.
|