Kashmir
Peace Initiatives and Realities
In early seventies, Ping-Pong diplomacy
brought the U.S. and China closer and recently
cricket diplomacy has brought India and Pakistan
closer together. Peace on the two sides of border,
which has suffered all these years, has now
generated deep and sincere goodwill and excitement
among the people of India and Pakistan. Both the
governments on either side of the border have
started recognizing this ground reality and
working step by step towards peace.
Kashmir has been at a boiling point since the
birth of Pakistan. Factually the state of Jammu
and Kashmir was carved out of the territories of
the Sikh kingdom after the Sikhs were defeated in
the first Anglo –Sikh war in 1846. The Dogra
Rajput chieftain of Jammu Raja Gulab Singh paid
the British war indemnity on behalf of Sikhs and
in return he was recognized the ruler of new state
of Jammu & Kashmir- including Ladakh. The
British Government transferred all the mountainous
territories with its dependencies situated to the
eastward of river Indus and the westward of river
Ravi, including Chamba and excluding Lahul to
Maharaja Gulab Singh of Jammu. The Lahore State
under the Treaty of Lahore ceded these to it. The
treaty between British and Maharaja Gulab Singh
took place at Amritsar on 16th March 1846 and
is known as the Treaty of Amritsar. At a later
stage Maharaja Gulab Singh had one more treaty
with Lahore Durbar in 1847. He surrendered hilly
areas between the Indus and Jehlem Rivers to
Lahore Durbar in exchange of some parts of the
plains of Punjab, which he annexed with his state.
Earlier, Raja Gulab Singh’s army chief Zoravar
Singh had marched towards Tibet after conquering
Ladakh and Baltistan. But he was killed on the
banks of Mansarovar Lake during Dec. 1841. On
Sept.15, 1842 a peace treaty was signed between
the government of Raja Gulab Singh (Jammu) and the
government of Dalai Lama (Lhasa), thereby making
Ladakh a part of Raja Gulab Singh’s empire. This
treaty is usually known as ‘Leh Treaty of 1842’.
The Hindus in Kashmir had opposed British
intervention in 1889, when Maharaja Pratap Singh
3rd Maharaja in the lineage was set aside by the
British and the government of the state was taken
over by them. Kashmiri Hindus were fearful of the
British designs to depose the Dogras and hand over
the state to Muslims. By 1891, Colonel Durand, as
the head of Dogra and Gorkha troops, had reached
the northern point of British rule, Misghar,
occupying Hunza and Nagar also. In 1893, Queen
Victoria made Pratap Singh Grand Commander of the
Star of India. By 1905 Lord Curzon had stabilized
relations with Afghanistan and created the
Northwest Frontier Province (NWFP) and the British
restored Pratap Singh his throne.
During the Indian National Movement, which
primarily was an Indian struggle against the
British for Independence also, gave rise to the
Muslim movement in India for a Muslim homeland. In
this connection several Congress and League
leaders visited Kashmir. Jinnah spent the summer
of 1944 in Kashmir. On May 10, 1944 he was
accorded a reception by National Conference.
Sheikh Abdullah described him as ‘a beloved
leader of the Muslims of India.’ On the same
day, in another reception accorded by the Muslim
Conference in Srinagar, Jinnah directed Muslims of
Kashmir to join Muslim Conference because “Muslims
have one platform, one KALMA and one God …I am a
Muslim and all my sympathies are for the Muslim
cause”.
After the British government approved the
partition plan of British India, Lord Mountbatten
returned to India on May 31, 1947. In the crucial
meeting on June 2, 1947, the Congress and the
League approved the plan. .On June 3, 1947 the
partition plan was made public. The next day
Mounbatten announced that the British would
transfer power to India by August 15, 1947. He
made another momentous announcement that day. The
British Paramountcy would lapse with the transfer
of power. Under the Indian Independence Act of
1947, accession of Indian states to India or
Pakistan was by the completion and signing of the
standard instrument of accession by the ruler and
its acceptance by the Governor General which made
it final.
Mr. Jinnah, in his statement of July 1947
confirmed the sovereign right of a ruler to accede
according to his wishes. On the contrary, during
midnight Oct.21-22, 1947 Pakistani - tribal hordes
entered the state of J&K and forcibly occupied
the strategic Kohala Bridge and the town
Muzafarabad. They moved rapidly towards Srinagar
with the help of Muslim soldiers of the state army
who joined the invaders. The Maharaja of J&K
state signed the Instrument of Accession to India
on Oct. 26, 1947 and Lord Mountbatten, the
Governor General of India sent his acceptance of
accession on Oct.27, 1947. The accession of Jammu
& Kashmir State imposed an obligation on the
dominion of India to defend the state. That same
day, airborne Indian troops were sent to Kashmir;
which saved Srinagar and turned the tide against
the invaders who had killed thousands of Hindus,
raped women and destroyed huge amounts of
property. Few men of the Indian soldiers of First
Sikh who went to action that day returned home.
Mountbatten proposed a UN supervised plebiscite
in Kashmir to Nehru instead of all out war with
Pakistan. In a meeting between the
Governor-Generals of India and Pakistan on Nov.1,
1947 Mohammed Ali Jinnah rejected Louis
Mountbatten’s offer of a plebiscite in Kashmir
as “redundant and undesirable.” Jinnah claimed
that accession of Kashmir to India was based on
violence; Mountbatten replied “the accession had
indeed been brought about by violence but violence
came from tribesman for whom Pakistan not India
was responsible.” Jinnah declared that Kashmir
was in his pocket. On same day, Gilgit Scouts, a
local Muslim militia raised by British for the
defense of Gilgit Agency revolted and declared the
accession of Gilgit Agency to Pakistan. Major
Brown, a British adventurer who commanded the
Gilgit Scouts, hoisted the flag of Pakistan over
the agency. The Governor of Gilgit, Gansara Singh
was put into prison. The state army garrison at
Bunji in Askardu, mostly Muslims, followed the
Gilgit Scouts, opening the way for the invading
forces of Pakistan which reached within a day to
take hold of Baltistan. While the Indian armies
were fighting back the invasion, the government of
India proposed to the UN that they intervene to
end the aggression committed by Pakistan against
the Jammu and Kashmir state on December 31, 1947.
The Security Council, in accepting India’s
complaint, did indirectly recognize the accession
of the Jammu and Kashmir State to India.
Deliberations in the Security Council led to the
establishment of the United Nations Commission for
India and Pakistan (UNCIP). The UNCIP resolution
of August 13, 1948 accepted by both Pakistan and
India provided for - I: -- a cease-fire, II-- a
truce agreement which directed Pakistan to
withdraw all its forces from the territory of the
state of Jammu and Kashmir, and III-- only
thereafter ascertaining of the will of the people
of the state in a peaceful manner.
After debates in the UNO, a cease-fire
agreement was concluded between India and
Pakistan, which came into force on January 1,
1949. The cease-fire divided Kashmir first into
two, then into three. Jammu and Kashmir has a land
area of 86,000 square miles and India splits it
into three-- Pakistan, 39,000 square miles, and
17,000 control now 30,000 square miles by China.
The valley of Kashmir, Poonch Town and the
adjoining small areas of Kargil, Ladakh and Jammu
regions are with India. The whole of Gilgit, a
major portion of Baltistan and whole of Mirpur,
part of Poonch and Muzaffarabad town are under
forcible occupation of Pakistan. Some portion of
the border Pakistan gifted to China. The treaty on
the delimitation of the frontier between Kashmir
and Sinkiang was signed in May 1962. Pakistan
ceded territories to China. India protested and
continues to claim them. The treaty stated
specifically that “on the settlement of the
Kashmir dispute between India and Pakistan, border
areas might come under the control of a third
state (China).” Apart from these territories of
Kashmir granted to China by Pakistan, China
remains in effective control of the Aksai-- Chin
region. Pakistan directly controls the northern
territories of Gilgit and Baltistan.
For Islamabad, Gilgit is of prime importance
because the Karakoram Highway, which links
Pakistan to China and Central Asia, runs through
it. Also, the numerous glaciers in Gilgit make the
area the world’s second largest water resource
apart from the poles. Pakistan is solely dependent
on water that runs from Kashmir, so it is
imperative to keep Gilgit and other water
resources of Kashmir under control. The Indus
waters treaty was signed in 1960. The treaty
divided The Indus River Basin with Pakistan;
Pakistan has control of the three western rivers
– Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab – and India has
control of the three eastern rivers – Ravi,
Sutlej and Beas. The division provided Pakistan
with 56% of the Indus catchment area and India
with only 31%. The J&K State is rich in its
water resources and has enormous hydropower
potential. The Indus at the point it crosses the
LOC has a yield of 11 million Aft (measure of
water in reservoirs); Chinab 20 .6 million Aft and
Jehlum 7 million Aft .The power potential has been
estimated at 15000 MW which is equivalent to about
30 million tons of oil! Pakistan also objected to
two ambitious projects that would have benefited
Kashmir: the “Bhagliar Project” and the “Wular
Barrage.” In March 2003, the Prime Minister of
Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, Sikandar Hayat said in
a seminar that, “the freedom fighters of Kashmir
are in reality fighting for Pakistan’s water
security.” Recently, MS Sherry Rehman (Pakistan
People’s Party, member of the Foreign Affairs
committee in Parliament) wrote in one of India’s
leading dailies, “Pakistan’s interest in
Kashmir arises not just from concerns about the
right of Kashmiri self-determination, but also
from hard-core territorial vulnerabilities on the
apportionment of its main Indus water system, with
India controlling the headworks…No government
can survive in Pakistan with a potential water
famine arising even partly out of Indian treaty
violations .”
Justice Owen Dixon of Australia was an
UN-appointed mediator between India and Pakistan
over Kashmir from May to September 1950. His
proposal was that inhabitants of each region in
the pre-1947 state of Jammu and Kashmir would
decide their own future by regional plebiscite and
then partition accordingly. India and Pakistan
rejected it both. The proposal for geographical
delimitation and regional plebiscite in the valley
was similar in part to one that Karan Singh
proposed in 1964 when he was still Sadar-I-Riasat
during 1952-64. The same year he became the
Governor of J&K. Mr. Gunnar Jarring of Sweden
in 1957 said in his report that one cannot hold
India to the plebiscite promise after a such a
long delay caused mostly by Pakistan’s
unwillingness to implement Parts A and B of the UN
resolution of August 1948. Even UN Secretary
--General Kofi Annan has accepted this position.
He has said that the UN resolutions are no longer
implementable because the resolution was meant to
be applied to the entire state of Jammu and
Kashmir including the areas of Pakistan-Occupied
Kashmir and areas given by Pakistan to China.
Unless those areas that had originally acceded to
India were restored to it, a plebiscite under UN
resolutions is unpredictable and unimplementable.
The clock cannot be put back, one must look
forward only.
The two countries fought several wars over the
region during 1947-48, 1965 and 1971 which led to
the creation of Bangladesh, the Kargil
misadventure in 1999 and the ongoing low-cost
proxy war and high-cost limited war around the
Siachen Glacier in North Kashmir. But these wars
have not resolved the issue. The 1972 Simla
Agreement between India and Pakistan stated with
reference to Jammu and Kashmir: “In Jammu and
Kashmir, the line of control resulting from the
cease-fire of December 17, 1971 shall be respected
by sides without prejudice to the recognized
portion of either side. Neither side shall seek to
alter it unilaterally irrespective of mutual
differences and legal interpretations. Both sides
further undertake to refrain from the threat or
the use of force in violation of this line.”
The agreement reached at Simla on July 2, 1972
is in fact a Peace Treaty and a culmination of the
UN cease-fire of 1948 and Tashkent declaration of
January 10, 1966. Few things have to be understood
well, as one cannot protect his future without
knowing the past. India is a secular democracy. It
has more Muslims than Pakistan…Kashmir is older
than Pakistan. Jammu and Kashmir has three
regions. There is a Hindu-dominated Jammu region,
Buddhist-dominated Ladakh, and Muslim-dominated
Kashmir valley. The original inhabitants of the
land, the Hindus of Jammu, the Buddhists of Ladakh,
the Hindus of Kashmir, and minorities like Sikhs,
Jains and even Shia Muslims want abrogation of
Art. 370 and full integration of the state with
the Indian union. They oppose second partition of
India on the basis of religion, which they realize
will upturn India. It is by and large Sunni Muslim
community of the valley, which is supporting
terrorism in the state. Muslims are ruling elite
in Kashmir. They are responsible for uneven
economic development of various regions of Jammu
and Kashmir state and the misuse of central aid.
It is an irony of fate that Kashmiri Hindus have
become refugees in their own country and not heard
either by the Central government or by State
government; thus their future is dark.
The Jammu and Kashmir state enjoys special
status under Art. 370 of the Indian constitution
and has its own Constituent Assembly which
unanimously adopted a new Jammu and Kashmir
Constitution on November 17, 1954. The basic
feature of the constitution is, “The state of
Jammu and Kashmir, is and shall be an integral
part of the union of India [Section 3].”
On February 22, 1994, both Houses of Parliament
of India unanimously adopted a historic resolution
regarding the state of Jammu and Kashmir,
reiterating inter-alia the nation’s resolve to
resist “any attempt to separate it from the rest
of the country…by all necessary means ’’ and
declaring that “India has the will and capacity
to firmly counter designs against its unity,
sovereignty and territorial integrity.”
In spite of all these realities about Kashmir,
there has been Track II Diplomacy, people to
people dialogue, Indo-Pakistan cricket, cinema,
and even health tourism. Simultaneously, there
have been many peace proposals by different
organizations and individuals to have permanent
peace in Jammu and Kashmir state. Many people have
advocated turning the LOC into an international
border with small adjustments here and there for
the lasting peace and prosperity of the state. The
Dixon plan, Kathwari plan, and the Musharraf plans
are similar, asking for a regional plebiscite and
then partition accordingly. Kashmiri Pandits
historic resolution for Homeland [Margdharshan
,1991], Prof. Balraj Madhok s Trification Plan,
Arundhati Ray s Neelam Plan, and so on… There
are examples of a “Good Friday” agreement that
would entail an India–Pakistan inters –governmental
commission, porous borders, and greater autonomy
within Jammu and Kashmir. India and Pakistan would
have to accept some version of joint
responsibility. Another example is the Treaty of
St. Germain on Sept. 10, 1919 that gave South
Tyrol to Italy, despite German majority. The
French province of Alsace-Lorraine was constantly
caught in wars between France and Germany and
changed its nationality four time. Sweden and
Finland settled a tiff over the predominantly
Swedish Aaland Islands under the auspices of the
League of Nations on June 27, 1921. Finland
promised to preserve Swedish language, culture,
and local traditions.
Former Pakistan Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto
said, ‘While the concept of soft borders,
territorial unity, or territorial settlement is
not possible, the concept of social unity is
possible.” The President of National Conference,
Omar Abdullah, said, “We believe in soft borders
between two parts of Jammu and Kashmir coupled
with autonomy”. Soft borders mean full flow of
Pakistani nationals to J&K State. The
Resettlement Act 1982 allows all those who
migrated to Pakistan between 1947 and 1954 to
return and claim their rights as Indian citizens.
The Act also provides resettlement of all those
who choose to return to state .The Act had been
adopted by the State Legislature in 1982, but the
controversial Act was referred to the then
President Giani Zail Singh , who referred it to
Supreme Court seeking an opinion about its
constitutional validity.
There is strong feeling in Jammu that the
implementation of the Act could bring more than
200,000 Pakistanis including descendants of those
who were born in Pakistan and many those trained
under the Taliban .It is unfortunate, Hindu and
Sikh refugees who have been living in Jammu for
more than 55 years have not been settled so far.
Of late, the Srinagar–Muzaffarabad bus
service will bring the two people living on either
side of LOC closer; they in turn will access each
other’s democratic freedoms, self–governance,
land reforms and development of respective regions
.It is unfortunate that people living on other
side of LOC have not tasted much of these
realities. Sardar Shaukat Ali Kashmiri, Chairman,
United Kashmir People s National Party, and
Secretary General, International Kashmir Alliance,
while quoting the July 2004 report of the Human
Rights Commission of Pakistan said, “fundamental
rights such as freedom of movement, freedom of
expression, freedom of assembly and freedom of
association are often fringed. There is limited
tolerance of divergent views. There are seven or
eight political parties in Azad Kashmir but the
State’s constitution and election laws debar
those who do not subscribe to the so-called
accession of Azad Kashmir to Pakistan, from
participating in election. Handpicked nominees of
the military regime in Islamabad are thrust upon
the people as the head of the government
,disregarding people’s wishes.” Comparatively,
Indian side of Kashmir is much better off
politically and economically. The only fear is
that once people realize this fact, the terrorists
will become panicky. Secondly, the bus service is
primarily aimed at uniting divided families on the
either side of LOC. There is hardly any
valley-based, Kashmiri speaking divided family. So
the cross-border bon – homie may become
cross-border terrorism. At that point of time, it
is the duty of the J&K police to check and
curb terrorism in the state in the same manner as
the Punjab police was the major factor in the
cessation of terrorism and secessionism in Punjab
rather than army. The army is trained to win wars;
special efforts by J&K police and CRPF will be
able to defeat terrorism.
The Pakistan government invited Hurriyat
leadership to visit POK and other parts of
Pakistan, most of who readily accepted. However,
Pakistan has denied the visit of 10 leading
politicians of the J&K State including Deputy
Chief Minister Mangat Ram Sharma, PDP president
Mehbooba Mufti, National Conference president,
Omar Abdullah and others. All these leaders are
from various mainstream political parties and
elected representatives of the people of state. It
is unfortunate, that at the insistence of
Pakistan, Hurriyat, an amalgam of Pro-Pakistani
groups which is sponsored, aided and patronized by
Jihadis as well as by Pakistan’s government is
given undue preference. Hurriyat leaders have
never ventured to fight any of the elections but
have become a powerful weapon in Pakistan’s
armory. Former Pakistan Prime Minster Choudhary
Shujat Hussian publicly said Hurriyat leaders
alone were not the representatives of the Kashmiri
people. Pok prime minister Sikandar Hayat Khan,
responding to queries in the state assembly on
June 24, 2oo5,said All Parties Hurriiyat
Conference led by Mirwaiz Molvi Umer Farooq came
from a specific area and there was no one from
Jammu and Ladakh divisions. “We cannot blindly
leave our fate in the hands of others. How can we
accept any decision on Kashmir by those who do not
have unity and unanimity among themselves and lack
representation of all regions?” One truth came
to light while Hurriyat leaders were in Pakistan
.At a function in Islamabad on June 13, 2005 Yasin
Malik , Chief of the Jammu Kashmir Liberation
Front had said, “I would say that in the initial
days of the Kashmir movement , the guy who had a
front role was he ( Sheikh Rashid Ahmed ,Pakistan’s
information minister ) . Nobody knows that when we
were brought on this soil, about 3500 boys were
accommodated at his farmhouse.”
Successive central and state governments have
sidelined pro -Indian and patriotic Kashmiri
Hindus. They have no role in the on-going peace
process or in any dialogue; they are at the
receiving end fighting a grim battle for their
SURVIVAL within and without Kashmir. All patriotic
forces of the state have to consolidate themselves
and play vital role in on-going peace process.
The bus journey from Srinagar to Muzaffarabad
is merely the start of a long and much awaited
Peace journey.
|