Porous Indo-Pak Border
A
Flawed Concept
By Yoginder Kandhari
OF late, there has been a lot of talk about
making Indo-Pak border porous. One fails to pick
a precedent to this concept from history.
Obtaining reality points to only two situations
- one when a border exists between two countries
and the other when none exists. In the context
of international law and relations, border
between two nations is sacrosanct and it is the
designated limit of a country's sovereignty and
its civil jurisdiction. Any attempt to alter its
status often sparks off a war. Furthermore, no
cross border activity is permitted except with
established legal authority like passport, visa
etc. As a counter argument one could be tempted
to cite examples of the status of America's
border with Canada and Mexico. But such a
comparison would be unfair since there is no
recent history of territorial disputes between
these countries and, more importantly, there is
a convergence of views on issues of strategic
interests, both at global and regional levels.
Moreover, travel restrictions have been eased
consequent to mutual understanding and these
relaxations do not in any way impinge upon the
territorial integrity of these countries.
Situation in case of Indo-Pak relations is
entirely different. There is a fifty seven year
old history of territorial disputes between
these two countries and their strategic
interests too are divergent. Pakistan has waged
a covert war in Jammu & Kashmir and the Indian
state has been bleeding for last fifteen years.
Floating concept of porous borders in such a
security scenario defies logic, more so when
such a proposal comes from India.
It is difficult to understand how this concept
of porous Indo-Pak border has gained currency of
late. One recollects a faint noise raised about
it by a non-resident Kashmiri Muslim towards
close of Narasimha Rao government. But nothing
more was heard thereafter till Mufti Sayeed took
over the reigns of Jammu & Kashmir state and the
BJP at the centre went along with him on the
issue. Talks are on between India and Pakistan
to work out modalities for re-establishing rail
link across Rajasthan border, starting a ferry
service to Pakistan off Gujarat coast and most
importantly easing travel restriction across
Line of Control (LoC) in Jammu & Kashmir, which
includes re-establishing Uri-Muzaffarabad road
link. Notwithstanding the merits or otherwise of
restoring such links at other places along
Indo-Pak border, any attempt to ease movement
across the LoC would have serious long term
consequences for Indian strategic interests in
the Valley and one can easily discern distinct
strands of deep rooted subversion in this
concept.
Indian Illusions. The
think-tanks in New Delhi are hopeful that easing
travel restrictions along LoC and re-opening
Muzaffarabad road will be a win-win situation
for India in Kashmir. Their assessment is based
on four main assumptions; firstly, it would
reaffirm Indian sovereignty over Kashmir;
secondly, it would erode ceasefire status of the
LoC since movement across would be permitted
only through legal documents such as passport &
visa; thirdly, Kashmiris would travel to
Pakistan as Indian citizens; lastly, throttled
democratic institutions and economic
backwardness of POK would disillusion our
Kashmiri Muslims about greener pastures across.
These assumptions, however, betray ground
realities.
Illusions Defined. Pakistan
must have chuckled when India proposed opening
of Uri- Muzaffarabad road as a CBM to better
bilateral relations. That Pakistan refused to
believe that India could commit such a
diplomatic faux pas is clear from their
reluctant initial response to this proposal.
Only after being convinced that India really
meant what she proposed did they respond with
modalities of implementing such a measure. A
critical assessment of the proposal would reveal
that it is bereft of political and strategic
sagacity. In fact, this retrograde step would
impair Indian interests in the Valley in the
long run. American connection is evident in this
proposal for one can safely assume it to be her
first step to gain an independent strategic
foothold in the area. Porous Indo-Pak border in
Jammu & Kashmir is part of cartographic
subversion carefully crafted by the Americans.
Other instruments of this design include
institutionalizing dual identity or citizenship
and establishing trade links between two parts
of Kashmir.
Political Implications.
Such a measure would have serious political
implications both at national and state levels.
In Indian context, such a step would sanctify
the LoC as de facto international border thus
negating the resolution passed, not long ago, by
the Indian Parliament that POK is under illegal
occupation of Pakistan. It would send signals of
political fatigue both to Pakistan and
insurgents in Jammu and Kashmir and would be a
moral victory for them. For the mainstream
Kashmiri politicians, it would be a welcome
measure since it brings them closer to
fundamentalist Muslim elite who long to usher in
an Islamic dispensation in Kashmir. That
precisely is the reason why some politicians
have been pressing the centre for early opening
of Uri-Muzaffarabad road link. No sooner was
this CBM proposed by India than PDP-led Jammu &
Kashmir Government put up hoardings throughout
the Valley announcing opening of Uri-Muzaffarabad
road, thus drawing immense political mileage.
Creation of euphoria on the issue would
impression the gullible that thousands were
separated from their near and dear ones by the
erstwhile ceasefire line. But the truth of the
matter is that cease fire line, or now the LoC,
separated mainly the Pahari Muslims from the
mainland ones and not many hearts were broken
with this divide. It is a recorded fact that not
more than a hundred Muslim families migrated to
Pakistan or POK at the time of partition or
immediately thereafter. This migration was
mainly restricted to political rivals of Sheikh
Abdullah, like Molvi Yusuf Shah, for fear of
reprisals. For the Muslim elite too such a
measure would be a boon for it would reaffirm
Muslim identity and Islamic consciousness in the
Valley. Thus the logic that restoration of Uri-Muzarrabad
link would unite the long separated cousins and
that peace would prevail in the Valley is
unfounded.
Sheikh Abdullah used emotional blackmail of
Kashmiri Muslims as a tool to firm his grip on
Kashmir politics. He was clever enough to
personally remain away from this deft stratagem
by using Plebiscite Front to brandish Kashmiri
separatist symbols of 'green flag', 'rock salt'
and 'opening of Muzaffarabad road'. Thus he
retained political options. For an average
Kashmiri, fed on Islamic fundamentalism, these
symbols remain sanctified even today. Any
attempt to re-open Uri-Muzaffarabad road link
would be interpreted as advantage Kashmiri
Muslims in their 'struggle' against Indian
nation and that suites Pakistan's long-term
designs.
Indian establishment's reasoning that allowing
Kashmiris to travel to Pakistan would expose
them to under-development in PoK and economic
backwardness of people there is not based on
sound appraisal of the ground realities. Much
that Kashmir experts want us to believe that
under-development and unemployment are the main
reason for the current upheaval in the Valley,
one needs to understand that this postulation is
far from truth. In pure economic terms, average
Kashmiri's lot is much better than that of an
average Indian. If feeling of economic
deprivation is the sole reason for all the ills
in the Kashmiri society today, then why should
we allow Kashmiri Muslims to seek a reference
frame in POK and not in Bihar where people are
steeped in abject poverty? If economic
well-being is the main criteria to develop
liberal outlook in people then Muslims settled
in France for long would not have agitated over
an order banning headscarves in French schools.
We must be candid enough to accept that Islamic
society is a closed system wherein intra
community socialization is easier irrespective
of obtaining economic dispensation. The issues
at stake are not as simple as these appear to
be. Proponents of porous border in Jammu &
Kashmir need to understand that almost every
family in Muzaffarabad and Mirpur has a member
staying in Europe or America and huge
remittances by them have immensely raised the
living standards in these areas. How such an
economic scenario disillusions Indian Kashmiri
Muslims remains a moot point. Mirpur's
non-resident Pakistanis wield considerable
influence in power corridors of their adopted
countries and have been in the forefront
fomenting and financing militancy in Kashmir
valley. They have largely been responsible to
bring the Kashmir issue into international
focus, especially so after eruption of
insurgency in the Valley.
Implications on Trade & Commerce.
Intriguingly, subversive lobbies have started
raking up that Kashmiri Muslim traders are being
discriminated against in Indian markets. Point
to note here is that this issue has been raised
at a time when India is seriously considering
opening Uri-Muzaffarabad road link. The intent
in this case is quite clear. Once this road link
is established Kashmir's trade route will be
diverted through Jhelum valley thus starving
Jammu region of the benefits of trade transit
worth 600 cr. annually. Pakistani government is
likely to provide all possible assistance to
Kashmiris to promote this trade route in order
to gradually increase latter's economic and
commercial dependence on her. Needless to
emphasize that commercial dependence often leads
to greater socialization and consequences of
such a scenario can well be imagined.
Strategic Implications.
Strategic foresight has never been the forte of
Indian establishment. One shudders to imagine
strategic consequences of making LoC porous. How
can the establishment think of porous borders in
present security scenario wherein insurgency
shows no signs of abating? India has been
fighting a low intensity conflict in the Valley
for the last fifteen years which is assisted by
Pakistan and foreign mercenaries who infiltrate
through the very LoC, at present heavily manned
by the Indian Army, which India proposes to
perforate. Indian strategists appear to have run
out of ideas and are desperate to change their
policies no matter what the consequences are.
As a consequence of rendering the border porous,
Pakistan is bound to launch demographic
subversion all along LoC, especially in Jammu
and Ladakh regions and along Chenab valley. This
would ensure that population in these
strategically sensitive regions turns hostile to
Indian interests. Demand for establishing
‘Chenab Hill Council’ is already gaining ground
and nefarious convergence in the emerging
scenario can easily be discerned if events are
perceived in totality. It is no secret that a
large number of Molvies from Uttar
Pradesh and Bihar have already settled in
Kashmir valley, Jammu city and border districts.
Most of them have obtained permanent resident
certificates, while the rest have purchased huge
benami assets. Role of these Molvis
in spreading Islamic fundamentalism in
Kashmir valley can not be ignored in context of
current armed uprising there. What stops
Pakistan in sneaking in such elements in large
numbers through porous border to facilitate her
design of wresting Kashmir from India? Insurgent
movement is bound to gain immense initiative
against security forces and India would thus be
forced on to the backfoot. Covert domination of
Chenab valley by Pakistan would render India's
defences untenable even in Jammu region thus
paving the way for ultimate secession of entire
state of Jammu and Kashmir from Indian union.
Conclusion. Porous border as a
concept, unfortunately, has the backing of a
section of Indian elite who continue to wield
considerable influence in corridors of power in
New Delhi. This lobby, to force Indian
government to commit such a strategic mistake,
is drumming up that insistence of GoI on proper
travel documents is 'untenable'. Pakistan is
fully aware of it and is likely to exploit this
Indian dilemma to her advantage. This concept,
if implemented, is a perfect recipe for
strategic hara-kiri by India for it is full of
flaws and contradictions.
Source:
Kashmir
Sentinel
|