Kargil Crises,
Response and Reactions
By Prof.
M.L. Koul
India was locked in a war of full-scale
proportions in Kargil and Drass sectors where
the same enemy had penetrated to realise its
strategic goals for purposes of annexing and
grabbing Kashmir. Despite being a failed state,
Pakistan has not reconciled to the reality of
Kashmir as an integral part of the political and
constitutional organisation of India. To alter
the existing political status of Kashmir,
Pakistan waged three full-blown wars to effect
demographical and political changes in the
northern borders that have assumed strategic
importance in the present geo-political
scenario.
The latest incursion deep into the interiors of
Kargil can be seen as the apogee of the well
delineated plans and strategies covertly devised
and launched by Pakistan during the dictatorial
days of Zia-ul-Haq. The aggression symbolised
the design of investing the phased processes of
indoctrination, penetration and large scale
sabotage with a new hue and direction to
materialise the strategic goals deemed vital to
the national interests of Pakistan.
In cahoots with Jehadists of varied hues and
Pan-Islamist forces Pakistan has been in hot
pursuit of effecting a second partition of India
with the perceptible objective of gaining a new
depth by the expansion of its power and
territorial base into the Himalayan belts of
Jammu and Kashmir. The protracted insurgency in
Kashmir launched by the indigenous Jehadi
elements with massive material and moral support
from global forces of Pan-Islamism is in
assiduous search of a solid foot hold to
consolidate its strategic gains for further
expansion into the valley deemed as vital to the
end of the revival caliphate from Kashmir to the
shores of the Atlantic ocean. Kargil intrusion
was not only on attempt to expand the area of
conflict but also provide an impetus to the
forces of insurgency chasing the goal of
disengag-ing Kashmir from India.
The cloak of Jehad has been put upon what is
purely a territorial ambition on part of
Pakistan. To capture Kargil and Drass for
further expansion into the east Pakistan devised
a perfidious plan to aggress Kargil under the
banner of Jehadists owing allegiance to the
fanatic terrorist formations like
Lashker-e-Toiba, Harkat-ul-Ansar, Harkat-i-Jehad
Islami and Al-Badr who have augmented the flanks
of Taliban as well. The Pakistan army in synch
with such terrorist formations launched its
operation in Kargil to materialise its
blue-print of annexing Kashmir. The new breed of
militants speak of a holy war to revive the
caliphate, a relic of the past, which is the
global polity of a global Muslim nation into
which Kashmiri Muslims have to merge for the
fact that they are Muslims and have to merge
with Pakistan.
The Indian Home Minister has aptly described
Pakistan as a rogue state as it flouts and has
least commitments to bilateral agreements and
even international codes of behaviour and
covenants. The Kargil incursion was launched to
violate the Line of Control which was properly
delineated and create a dispute about it with a
view to re-drawing it accordant with its
strategic objectives. The violation of the Line
of Control was equally aimed at forcing a
solution of the Kashmir tangle through
international intervention.
Though initially flabbergasted by the blatant
incursion into the Indian territory of strategic
importance, the Indian government rose to the
occasion and launched the ‘Operation Vijay’ to
defeat and eject out the enemy from its
territory. Despite the terrain being difficult
and inhospitable, the Indian army structured a
baffling military response and compelled the
enemy to withdraw its aggression from the
territories occupied clandestinely and in
violation of bilateral pacts and agreements. The
counter-offensive was so vehement and vigorous
that the Pakistani defences shook to the roots
and crumbled into a heap of ruins. The Indian
armed forces exhibited a unique determination
and well coordinated planning to register a
victory in real operational military terms.
Pakistan was not allowed to score a victory in
terms of military operations and that is what
forced it to withdraw from the occupied
territories in all ignominy.
The opposition in Pakistan and reitred army
generals have scathed the Nawaz Sharief
government for the failures in Kargil
opertaions. Air Marshal Nur Khan characterised
the Kargil intrusion as a military disaster
which had finally proved that Kashmir tangle had
no military solution. He called the operations
as covert which could not be lent support by the
international community. He held the Prime
Minister and the Army Chief respon-sible for the
fiasco and debacle. The former Vice Chief of
Army Staff called the Kargil operations as a
complete fiasco and a failure as it was lacking
in the basics of strategic planning and failed
to anticipate the reaction of the enemy. The
former ISI chief was equally critical of the
operations as strategic priori-ties had not been
set and political and diplomatic preparations
had not been made. Mrs Benazir Bhutto, the
leader of opposition and former Prime Minister
of Pakistan, has in a recent statement called
Nawaz Sharif a security risk and characterised
him as the most incompetent Prime Minister in
the history of Pakistan. After Kargil intrusions
the opposition is in absolute unanimity to
dislodge the government in saddle. The
fundamentalist groups are equally dead set
against the Prime Minister for entering into
commitments with Bill Clinton.
How the counter-offensive was organised and
launched by the Indian government has turned
into a hot subject of debate in the country. It
has become a staple of the media and is sure to
impact the elections as well. The critics of
the government charge it with intelligence
failure and slackening of the vigil on the
borders. The criticism in not fake nor is it
lacking in pitch. The Pakistani intruders must
have made thorough preparations to position
themselves on the heights and must have been
equipped with heavy weapons to defend themselves
and their shelters. Regular supplies must have
come to them through supply routes. It sounds as
sheer negligence on the part of intelligence
agencies as not to have kept and maintained a
consistent watch on the enemy movements. As per
a report in the media about a brigadier and a
major general, posted in the area being relieved
of their charge has made the picture murkier. A
mason from Kargil itself is said to have
constructed new bunkers for the intruders on the
ridges and the materials used in the
constructions are said to have been carried to
the top heights by men from Kargil itself. What
gets established is that there have been enemies
within who have been in active liaison with the
main enemy. The Indian governments of varied
hues have always failed in their intel-ligence
to comprehend the nexus between the internal
subversives and the external enemy. The same
failure was witnessed in 1989 variety of
insurgency when the state power was visibly seen
colluding with the terrorists churned out from
the Quranic schools and madrasas.
Pakistan was upset, way shell-shocked, when it
failed to muster diplomatic support for its
Kargil misadventure. China, an old ally of
Pakistan, back-tracked from supporting the
Pakistan position of violating the borders
through an armed intrusion. The G-8 countries,
despite some ambiguities, made a declaration to
the effect of withdrawal of Pak forces from the
Indian territory. Germany came out in
unequivocal support of India as it had re-ports
about the involvement of Afghan and Taliban
mercenaries in the Kargil conflict alongwith
Pakistan army regulars. Washington could not see
any cogency in the escalation of tension along
the borders and forced Pakistan Prime Minister
to the commitments of the withdrawal of his
forces from the occupied territories. It appears
that there is a paradigmic shift in the American
position because of the tacit support of
Pakistan to Osama Bin Laden supporting
international terrorism. The Dullesian era of
cold war is already over and Pakistan seems to
have outlived its utility. The American position
could be dictated by the economic interests the
Americans have in the country that has taken to
the liberalised economy in a big way.
The fact that India has earned global support on
its Kargil position cannot be brushed off so
easily. It could be the result of the hectic
diplomatic efforts on the part of our foreign
minister who has been busy in parleys with a
number of countries holding sway over the
international affairs. But, there is a danger
that the global support might turn
interventionists to the disadvantage of the
Indian interests of national security and
territorial integrity. As Kargil conflict is the
direct off shoot of Kashmir insurgency, the
policy planners and intellectuals committed to
the cause of territorial integrity of the
country must prevent any and all moves that
loosen the political and constitutional ties of
Kashmir with India. The concept of greater
autonomy based on population complexion of the
regions in the state is as inimical to the
national interests as the Krepon report
suggestive of a plebiscite in the Valley and
softening of borders between Kashmir and
Pakistan held part of it.
The Indian government was shocked when it was
handed over the mutilated bodies of six Indian
soldiers who were captured by Pak soldiers in
Kargil tortured and done to death. The Indian
politicals decried it as flagrant violation of
the Haguq convention which delineates the
treatment to be meted out to the prisoners of
war. The same politicals across the broad
political spectrum of the country did not utter
a word when Muslim terrorists inflicted unheard
of savageries and atrocities on the hapless
Kashmiri Pandits, who have been victims of
genocide. Girija Tickoo, a lab assistant, was
chopped into two halves by a mechanical saw
after she was gang raped. Sarvanand Kaul Premi,
a noted poet and literateur, was skinned off,
nails were driven into his forehead where he put
a tilak-mark, hair on his body was pulled out
and his eyes were gouged out. Sarla Bhat, a
staff nurse working in the Institute of Medical
Sciences, Soura, was gang-raped, her breasts
were chopped off, her private parts were
mutiliated, was put to bullets and thrown off on
the roadside to the care of volunteers. A thick
cloak of concealment was placed on the
savageries inflicted on the Kashmiri Pandits.
Had it been thoroughly broadcast to the world,
the Pak soldiers would not dared flout the
humanitarian norms of civilised people.
The Hindus of J&K State have been the main
targets of the moves and maneuvers of the forces
of militarised Islam. They have been destroyed
and divested and are in ruins. Three lakh
Kashmiri Pandits have been externed from their
homes and hearths and are in exile and Diaspora.
The Hindus of Doda, Poonch and Rajouri have been
put to orgies of large-scale massacres. The
Hindus living along the borders in Jammu are
devastated and have been left high and dry,
uncared for and beleaguered. They perceive
government of India as a soft state reluctant to
measure their reality vital to the over-all
interests of the country.
Source: Kashmir
Sentinel
|