Statement
of Maharaja Hari Singh on Cripps Mission
Legal Document No
71
(Extract)
We have yet to know the conclusions at which His
His Majesty's Government has unanimously arrived under
the combined stress of British India's well-known
demands and the requirements of the war situation to
satisfy the legitimate aspirations of interests.
On the part of the States, a considerable factor in
the Indian policy and an important party to be
satisfied, there has been a tendency even within
recent weeks to give prominence to the credo of
'Relations to the Crown'. These relations have so far
been maintained through and Directed by a Department
set up by the will of the Crown, the policy and
practice of the Department being determined by the
Crown's functionaries. Logically therefore it would
seem that the Princes cannot object to having dealings
with a Central Government of India which the Crown nay
constitute. Nor have they any reason to assume that
they would not get a square deal from such a
Government.
In any case, it is the duty of the Princes to show
themselves the equals of nationals anywhere in the
world.
The Princes are justified in assuming that, in a
Self-Governing India, every autonomous unit will share
equally the fiscal and financial advantage accusing in
such an India as well as the responsibilities and
burdens entailed by the maintenance of peace and order
and the provision of beneficent service and public
utilities in the territories administered. And it
should not be forgotten that these territories may
have problems peculiar to their populations as well as
to their physical conditions. .
In the India of tomorrow, such of the Princes'
prerogatives as enable them to afford a better life to
their subjects and to ameliorate their lot must
remain. Other privileges, which may be merely matters
of honour and glory, shedding effulgence on their
personalities, are of comparatively small account when
set beside other considerations such as the
safe-guarding of resources necessary for up-to-date
Government and the relief of burdens borne by the
State alone.
In promising to support the proposals brought by
Sir Stafford Cripps, the Chamber of Princes added the
proviso that the support should be without prejudice
to the right of individual States to lay their case
before him and general, without prejudice to the
inherent rights of the States. These rights it is not
easy to define or catalogue when one considers the
effect of the political practice inaugurated in 1860
and since maintained with the aid of 'usage and
sufferance'. In any cased there is a piquant irony in
the contrast between the Princes' reiteration the
phrase-'Treaty Rights' and the Viceroy's suggestion
that all Princes, for certain purposes, should
voluntarily abdicate in favour of the Political
Officers accredited to their courts.
When at the Round Table Conference the Princes
assented to the working out of a Federal Constitution,
they were prepared voluntarily to delegate some of
their sovereign powers to a Federal Government. In the
India of the future, it is possible that the matters
committed to the Central Government would be far fewer
than those recited in the Table of Federal Matters
appended to the Act of 1935.
Unless, therefore, the proposals entrusted in Sir
Stafford Cripps are fundamentally adverse to the
interests of the Indian States and this is unthinkable
there is no reason why there" should not be ample
common ground between the States and the rest of
India.
Freedom must be our watchword...freedom from
crippling restrictions and strangling control, freedom
front the subordination of India's interests to the
interests of other parts of the Commonwealth.
|