Report
of the Kashmir Constitutional Reform Conference
1932
Legal Document No
50
The most important issues which the Conference has
examined are as follows:
(a) Is it desirable that
there should be a Legislative Assembly?
(b) If so,
- What should be the
functions of such an Assembly,
- What should be the
franchise basis, and
- How should the Assembly be
composed.
As regards the first of these
questions, it will be seen from the proceedings that
there has been some difference of opinion. In regard
to the functions of the proposed Assembly something
closely approaching unanimity has been achieved. So
far as the other main issues are concerned, there has
been a: very considerable divergence of views,
especially with regard to the composition of the
Assembly. This divergence is hardly surprising,
considering the conflicting interests which different
members have represented. There appeared unfortunately
to be no hope whatsoever of attaining any semblance of
a unanimous finding on these points, and it was
therefore agreed that there was no prospect of
submitting a joint report. The Chairman accordingly
forwards his owns recommendations, referring, as may
be necessary, to the opinions put forward on behalf of
various interests: the proceedings recorded will show
that the recommendations made, follow in general the
joint views expressed, where there has been a
consensus of opinion: where opinions have differed
endeavours have been to bear in mind the legitimate
interests of all communities concerned.
The full purport of the draft
recommendations has been read out in Urdu at a meeting
held on the 7th of April so as to provide an
opportunity for the suggestion of modifications or
amendments; any such suggestion received has been
given due attention, and each member has been informed
by letter of the final recommendations which are being
made in regard to the composition of the Assembly
after further consideration of the views put forward.
ESTABLISHMENT OF A
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY
Certain members have, it will
be seen from the proceedings, expressed considerable
misgivings as to the wisdom of such an innovation at
the present time, in view of tine disturbed conditions
which have unhappily been prevailing.
The general feeling is,
however, in favour of such an. experiment being tried.
It appears highly desirable
that the subjects of the State should be given a voice
in the administration and in view of the announcement
already made by His Highness in this behalf there
would seem to be no room for doubt as to the action
which should be taken in this respect.
It is recommended that a
Legislative Assembly should be established as soon as
may be practicable.
POWERS AND FUNCTIONS OF
THE ASSEMBLY
The proceedings will show
that a virtually unanimous opinion has been expressed
at the Conference in Favour of the functions of the
Assembly being defined as follows:
LEGISLATION
Subject to the final assent
of His Highness the Maharaja Bahadur the Assembly
should have power to make laws.
GOVERNMENT BILLS
All Government bills except
such bills, if any, as relate exclusively the reserved
subjects (namely (1) the person or privileges of His
Highness or members of the Ruling Family, (2) foreign
relations, (3) the discipline and control of the State
Forces) should be referred to the Assembly and should
not become law until ratified thereby provided that:
- His Highness should in
case of emergency retain full power to make and
promulgate ordinances for the good government of
the State and any such ordinances should be
operative for a period of six months unless
repealed by His Highness at an earlier date.
- His Highness should, where
he considers it necessary in the interests of good
government, have power to certify any bill which
the Assembly may decline to pass.
PRIVATE BILLS
The introduction of any
private bill should be allowed and the bill, if
passed, should, subject to His Highness' final assent,
become law provided that:
- no such bill shall relate
to reserved subjects as already defined;
- unless the previous
approval of His Highness' Government has been
obtained, no bill shall involve the imposition of
new taxation or the enhancement or reduction of existing
taxation;
- no bill shall affect the
religious rites, usages, and downments or personal
law of any community other than to which the
proposer belongs; a bill affecting the usages etc.
of that community only which the proposer
represents may be introduced if not less than two
thirds of the elected members of their community
are in favour thereof, and if the previous
permission of His Highness for the introduction of
such a bill has been obtained;
- no bill shall involve the
imposition of disabilities on any class or
community as such;
- no bill shall affect the
rights specifically granted to to Jagirdars,
Pattadars, etc. in their Sanads or Pattas;
- unless the previous
sanction of His Highness' Government has been
obtained no bill shall be introduced which it is
intended to apply to any Illaqa or Jagir to which
the State laws are not ordinarily applicable.
His Highness shall have the
power of referring back any bill to the Assembly for
further consideration or amendment.
The above proposals,
representing, as already remarked, the practically
unanimous opinion of the Conference, are recommended
for adoption.
Various other suggestions
have been put forward; it has been suggested for
instance that no bill should be introduced (a) which
affects the privileges o} Rajputs as such or (b) which
affects any class of non-state subjects residing in
the Jammu and Kashmir State.
There does not appear to be
any sufficiently strong reason for adopting these
suggestions. In regard to the rights of non-State
subjects for the purposes of the Assembly, opinion is
expressed below.
QUESTIONS AND RESOLUTIONS
Questions and resolutions
should be permitted without restriction provided that:
- they do not relate to
reserved subjects as already defined;
- they do not affect the
religious rites, usages, endowments or personnel
law of any community other than that to which the
member asking the question or moving the
resolution belongs; such questions or resolutions
may, however, be allowed with the special
permission of the President of the Assembly, who
should, where he considers it necessary, refer the
matter for the orders of His Highness;
- they do not relate to the
merits of cases under enquiry by a court of law.
Supplementary questions should
be allowed.
PERIOD OF NOTICE
In the case of questions,
thirty days' notice should ordinarily be given, so as
to afford due opportunity for the supply of the
information required. The President should have the
power to reduce this period where it may be necessary.
In the case of private bills,
a similar period of thirty days' notice should be
given, and the member wishing to introduce a bill
should forward a copy thereof together with a
statement of the objects and reasons.
In regard to resolutions
fifteen days, notice should be given.
In the case of any bills,
resolutions of questions for which previous sanction
is necessary, an additional period of fifteen days'
notice over and above the minimum period ordinarily
prescribed should be required.
BUDGET
The President should appoint
certain days prior to the announcement of the State
financial year (at present the first of Katik or
mid-October) for the discussion of the State Budget In
the Assembly.
A week before the first date
so appointed, a copy of the budget and a brief
explanatory statement thereof in Urdu should be
forwarded to each member of the Assembly. Members
should on the dates appointed be given full
opportunity to ask questions and make suggestions
relating to any part of the budget with the exception
of reserved subjects.
No kind of new taxation
should be imposed without reference to the Assembly;
the grant of monopolies etc. which amount in
themselves to the imposition of new taxation should be
treated in the same manner.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE
ASSEMBLY
Speeches delivered in the
Assembly should be privileged and should not be
actionable. It should be the function of the President
to intervene in the case of exceptionable remarks.
In regard to the above
points, namely questions and resolutions, period of
notice, budget procedure and freedom of speech, the
proposals recorded above represent the general consensus
of opinion expressed at the Conference, and their
Adoption is recommended accordingly.
STANDING COMMITTEE
It has been suggested that
simultaneously with the creation of the Assembly, a
non-official Standing Committee should be appointed
and that the policy of Government in regard to
finance, public health, etc. should be explained to
the members of such Committee and their opinions on
these point should be Ascertained.
This is a development which
might well take place after a suitable period has
elapsed. It appears advisable, however, that it should
be deferred until the Assembly has actually been
created and some experience of its working has been
gained.
FRANCHISE
It is generally agreed that
the number of voters on the Electoral roll should
amount approximately to ten per cent of the total
population, a ratio which has frequently been adopted
as the working rule in British India. In order to
achieve this object the appointment of a Franchise
Committee or some Organization corresponding thereto
will be necessary. Information is unfortunately
lacking as to the number of people likely to be
entitled to vote if different kinds of qualifications
are adopted; the proposals put forward are therefore
merely tentative and suggested as a temporary
expedient.
As a working basis for the
time being, various qualifications have been
suggested. It will be observed the proceedings that
opinions have differed to a marked extent in this
respect
For instance, the views given
in respect to land revenue qualifications have varied
between Rs. 10 payment and Rs. 50 payment per annum;
in respect to immoveable property between Rs. 500 and
Rs. 2000 in value, and in regard to educational
qualifications between Middle pass and Graduate
standard.
It is recommended that in the
four following cases, the standards now prescribed for
the right of voting at Municipal elections may be
adopted as franchise qualifications in regard to the
Assembly:
- Payment of land revenue
not less than Rs. 20 per annum.
- Possession of immoveable
property not less than Rs. 1000 in value.
- Membership of a learned
profession, such as the Medical or Legal
profession, etc.
- The receipt of a
Government pension of not less than Rs. 25 per
month.
In addition to the above it is
recommended that any of the following additional
qualifications should also be regarded as. sufficient:
- Payment of Municipal taxes
not less than Rs 20 per annum.
- Title holders, Zalidars,
Lumberdars and Safed-Poshes.
- Jagirdars and Pattadars
enjoying an assignment of not less than Rs 50 per
annum.
- Educational standard
Matriculate or corresponding vernacular standard.
The qualifications suggested
above would appear to be sufficient for the present.
It does not appear advisable to provide for further
qualifications in the way of annual income, payment of
house-rent or payment of customs as there will be
difficulties in the way of satisfactorily verifying
such qualifications.
The same qualifications for
membership or the Assembly as those recommended for
franchise might be adopted.
DISQUALIFICATIONS
It is recommended that the
following should be regarded as disqualified for
purpose of franchise:
- Females.
- Persons below the age of
21.
- Person certified as
insane.
- Undischarged bankrupts or
insolvents.
- Persons convicted by a
criminal court of an offense punishable with
imprisonment for a term exceeding six punishable
with imprisonment for a term exceeding six months,
provided that if a period of five years has
elapsed, since the termination of the sentence,
the disqualification shall cease to operate.
- Persons who are at the
time of the election under orders by a competent
court to provide security for good behaviour.
- Persons, other than
State-Subjects, who have not been domiciled in the
State for a consecutive period of five years
immediately preceding the time of the election.
With regard to the latter
disqualification. it has been represented on the one
hand that only State subjects as now defined should
have the right to vote and that on the other hand that
one year's residence in the State should be sufficient
of qualify for franchise and that the present
definition of "State subject" should be
discarded all purposes. It is not within the scope of
the Conference to consider the appropriateness of the
existing definition of "State subject" for
general purposes. As regards qualification for the
franchise, however, though there is every reason for
upholding the prior claims to State subjects in
general, the present definition appears to be unduly
rigid; domicile in the state for a thousand years
cannot according to the definition qualify a man to
become a hereditary State subject. It would seem both
unfair and inexpedient to deny the right of franchise
to a man who has so far identified himself with local
interests as to make his domicile in the State over a
consecutive period of five years. As one member of the
Conference has aptly expressed it, man can beret sons,
he cannot beget his ancestors.
Some Members have given their
opinions in favour of an experiment in the direction
of female suffrage. But the general consensus of
opinion is against this departure. In view of the
backward condition of female education it appears advisable
to defer for the present any proposal of this nature.
In regard to
disqualifications for elected membership of the
Assembly, it is recommended that the same standards as
those proposed above in the case of franchise should
be adopted with the following additions or
modifications:
- Persons below the age of
25 (instead of 21 as in the case of franchise).
- Persons not on the
electoral roll.
- Persons unable to read,
write and understand the court language, namely
Urdu.
- Persons actually in the
service of Government.
- Dismissed Government
servants, provided that the disqualification in
this respect may be removed by the specific orders
of Government.
- Persons, other than first
class State subjects as now defined who have not
been domiciled in the State for a consecutive
period of fifteen years, immediately preceding the
time of the election.
In the case of this letter
disqualification, the remarks already made in
connection with the question of State subjects should
suffice.
It will be observed from the
proceedings that there has been a fair approach to
unanimity in regard to the question of
disqualifiations.
COMPOSITION OF THE
ASSEMBLY
Elected Members
In the absence of detailed
information in regard to the number of persons likely
to be qualified to vote on the basis suggested above,
a rough guide can be afforded by the population
statistics as recorded in the Census which has
recently taken place. Once again it may be pointed out
that the proposals put forward are only tentative and
may be found to require considerable modification when
statistics have been collected showing the approximate
voting strength of various classes and communities.
The total population of the
State is recorded as roughly 36-1/2 lakhs. Excluding
the Poonch and Chenani Jagirs and certain distinct
Frontier Illaqas such of as Hunza and Nagar which are
in certain respects withdrawn from the scope of the
ordinary State machinery, the population comes to
approximately 32 lakhs. If Ladakh and Gilgit proper
are also excluding there would be a further reduction
of about 2-1/4 lakhs. The general feeling of the
Conference is that Ladakh and Gilgit proper should not
be excluded for the purposes of the Assembly. It is
true that these tracts are comparatively backward,
also that they are cut off at certain times of the
year; they from however, an integral part of the State
for ordinary purposes and except in the winter months
communications are open.
It is clearly undesirable
that the Assembly should be composed of so large a
number of members as to become unwieldy. A working
basis in regard to the number of elected members would
seem to be provided by the allotment of one such
member to every lakh of the population. On this basis
there would be 32 elected members in all.
JOINT OR SEPARATE
ELECTORATES
One important question that
arises is whether electorates should be separate or
joint. It will be observed that there has been a
general consensus of opinion at the conference in
favour of separate electorates. Some members have
pointed out that, although the establishment of
separate electorates has some times been regarded as
responsible for increasing communal tension in British
India, the acute communal feeling which unhappily
prevails in the State at the present time can
certainly not be ascribed to this cause; it has been
maintained that in the case of the Srinagar
Municipality the introduction of joint electorates has
enhanced the feeling of antagonism and distrust
between the different communities. It would appear
that in the existing state of tension, the institution
of joint electorates must be regarded as a dangerous
experiment. It is obviously advisable at the present
time to avoid as far as possible all superfluous
elements of danger. Separate electorates are
accordingly recommended,
There has been a consensus of
opinion on the point that there should be no plural
voting. The place at which a voter should record his
vote should depend upon the locality in which he
normally resides at the time of the election.
In regard to the allocation
of elected seats in the Assembly among the various
communities widely different views have been put
forward. It has been claimed on the one hand that at
least 25 seats out of 32 should be allotted to
Muslims, who number 75 per cent. Out of the population
of the part of The State with which it is proposed
that the Assembly should be concerned. On the other
hand it has been represented that there should be two
elected Hindu members to every one Muslim. And special
claims have been but forward on behalf of the
particular classes or communities, such as Sikhs and
Rajputs and also on behalf of the depressed classes.
The two main communities are
Muslims and Hindus. The population of these two
communities stated in round numbers is as follows for
the various portions of the State which it is proposed
to take into consideration:
|
Hindus |
Muslims |
JAMMU
PROVINCE |
Jammu
Wazarat excluding Jammu City |
1,37,000 |
1,93,000 |
Jammu
City |
12,000 |
24,000 |
Kathua
Wazarat |
40,000 |
1,21,000 |
Reasi
Wazarat |
1,55,000 |
79,000 |
Udhampur
Wazarat |
1,17,000 |
1,56,000 |
Mirpur
Wazarat |
2,78,000 |
57,000 |
Total
Jammu |
7,39,000 |
6,30,000 |
KASHMIR
PROVINCE |
Southern
Kashmir excluding Srinagar City. |
5,75,000 |
20,000 |
Srinagar
City |
1,39,000 |
34,000 |
Northern
Kashmir |
5,43,000 |
11,000 |
Muzaffarabad |
2,22,000 |
4,000 |
Total
Kashmir |
14,79,000 |
69,000 |
FRONTIER
PROVINCE |
Ladakh |
1,53000 |
300 |
Gilgit
Proper |
31,000 |
1,000 |
Total |
1,84,000 |
1,300 |
Grand
Total |
24,02,000 |
7,00,300 |
Buddhists who are almost
entirely confined to the frontier districts of Ladakh
amount to 39,000. Sikhs whose numbers are more or less
equally divided between the provinces of Jammu and
Kashmir, also come to 39,000.
If population is strictly
followed, Muslims, whose ratio works out at 75 per
cent, should get 24 out of 32 elected seats and
Hindus, who come to 22 per cent should be given 7,
Budhists and Sikhs would hardly qualify for one seat
between them.
The principle of "weightage"
has, however, to be taken into account in order to
safeguard the interests of minor communities. This
principle has been fully recognised in British India.
In the United Provinces for instance Muslims, whose
number only a little more than 14 per cent of the
population, have been given not less than 29 per cent
of elected seats in the Legislative Council. In Bombay
non-Muslims, whose numbers amount to nearly 79 per
cent of the population, have been reduced in the
matter of elected seats to a bare majority.
Responsible Mohammadan opinion has teen expressed in
favour of the principle of "weightage" being
applied to the State Assembly provided that Muslims
are allowed to retain an actual majority in the matter
of elected seats.
A fair solution would appear
to be provided by allowing to Hindus sufficient "weightage"
to bring their number of elected seats in the Assembly
upto 33-1/3 per cent Muslims would in this case be
awarded a fraction over 60 per cent while Sikhs and
Buddhists would each be given just over 3 per cent.
It has been claimed that not
less than 4 seats should be allowed to Sikhs, or,
failing that, two' one for Jammu and one for Kashmir.
It is true that, as has already been remarked, the
Sikh population is scattered over the two Provinces.
It is also true that the behaviour of the Sighs has
been exemplary during the recent disturbances and that
they are fully deserving of consideration, but, as far
as the State is concerned, they are relatively a very
small community and it is difficult to allot them more
than one elected seat without unduly affecting the
interests of others. It is suggested that their
aspirations might be met by the practice of including
among the nominated members one Sikh member coming
from that province to which the elected Sikh member
does not belong. This should be sufficient to provide
for the reasonable requirements of the community as
the Sikh representative at the Conference has
explained, the Sikhs are not striving for power in the
State, they only desire that their voice should be
heard. The only other alternative that seems possible
is to increase by one the total number of elected
members, this would of course disturb the general
ratio.
In the case of the Buddhists
one elected seat should suffice. As mentioned above,
the Buddhist community is practically confined to one
portion of the State and it is doubtful what their
actual voting strength will prove to be.
Some difficulty is to found
in deciding how effect is to be given to the "weightage"
proposed for Hindus. It is true that the great bulk of
the Hindu population belongs to the Jammu Province,
but there are obvious objections in the way of
allotting them a larger number of seats in that
Province, than can be given to Muslims, who even in
Jammu are more numerous shall Hindus. The most
satisfactory solution appears to lie in giving the
"weightage" its main effect in the Kashmir
Province; although the Hindus in Kashmir are
relatively small in numbers, they are a highly
advanced community and it is to be expected that their
population would suggest.
It is not proposed that any
elected seats should be reserved for the depressed
classes. In the census the depressed classes are
recorded as Hindus, and there appears to be no
sufficient reason for according them different
treatment from that received by them in the Punjab,
where no special reservation obtains.
It is recommended that the
total number of elected seats should be 33 and that
they should be distributed as follows:
|
Muslims |
Hindus |
Buddhists |
Sikhs |
JAMMU
PROVINCE |
Jammu City |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Jammu
Wazarat |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
Kathua
Wazarat |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Udhampur
Wazarat |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
Reasi
Wazarat |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Mirpur
Wazarat |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Total
Jammu Province |
7 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
KASHMIR
PROVINCE |
Srinagar
City |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
Southern
Wazarat |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Northern
Wazarat |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Muzaffarabad |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Total
Kashmir Province |
11 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
FRONTIER
PROVINCE |
Gilgit
proper |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Ladakh |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Total
Fontier |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Total
State |
0 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
Here again there has been a
great difference of opinion, the proposals put forward
by various members for the proportion of nominated to
elected seats vary between 25 per cent and 150 per
cent.
It would seem a fair solution
that the total number of nominated members should be
equal to two thirds of the number of elected members,
namely 22. and that in addition to these His Highness
the Maharaja Bahadur should, if he sees fit to do so,
appoint his ministers, not exceeding 5 in number; as
ex-officio members. The total membership of the
Assembly would thus be limited to 60 (33+22+5). In
regard to the nominated members, not less than one
third should be non-officials; apart from His Highness
should have entire discretion in their matter of
nomination. There has been a general consensus of
opinion, however, expressed at the Conference that
nomination should be so regulated as to provide as far
as possible for the representation of interests which
are not specially catered for in the elected
membership, such for instance as Jagirdars and
commercial interests.
If the above recommendations
are adopted, there would be a clear erected majority
and there would be a proportion of not less than two
non-official members to the one official member.
PRESIDENT OF THE ASSEMBLY
It is recommended that the
Assembly should be presided over by the Prime
Ministers or such other Ministers as His Highness may
be pleased to appoint for the purpose.
NUMBER AND PLACE OF
MEETINGS
A part from any special
meetings which it may be found necessary to call, it
is recommended that there should be two regular
meeting of the Assembly a year, one at Srinagar in the
month of Assuj (September-October) when the budget
proposals amongst other matters can be discussed, and
one at Jammu in the month of Phagan (February-March)
or such other time as may be convenient.
LIFE OF THE ASSEMBLY
The life of the Assembly
should, it is recommended be fixed at three years in
the first instance.
Rules relating to the number
necessary to form a quorum and other matters of
comparatively minor importance can be provided for
suitable in the bye-laws.
It is recommended that the
Assembly should have no power to propose an alteration
in the enactment creating the Assembly unless the
previous approval of His Highness is obtained through
the President.
DISTRICT BOARD
Apart from the question in
creating a Legislative Assembly the subject of
District Boards and Municipalities has also been
raised at the Constitutional Conference.
At present there are no
District Boards in the State. There has been a general
consensus of opinion expressed at the Conference in
favour of a beginning being made in this matter in the
following way.
Wazirs or District Officers
should once every year call a meeting of all the
Zaildars in their District. The Tehsildars and the
Road Cess Overseer should also be present. The Wazir
should make known the amount of funds available from
the Road Cess Fund for expenditure in the Wazarat, he
should ascertain from those present the requirements
of the various Zilas and he should then proceed to
make allotments after taking into consideration the
views expressed. Zaildars should at the same time be
given an opportunity to put forward their views in
regard to other matters such as Schools, Medical
Relief, Sanitation, etc.
In the case of districts in
which distances are great and communications
indifferent, such as for instance the Udhampur Wazarat
which includes Kishtwar, Bhaderwah and Ramban, it may
be difficult to summon Zaildars to District
headquarters without causing them undue inconvenience;
in such cases the Wazir should make a point of
consulting Zaildars at convenient places when he
proceeds on tour.
It has been agreed at the
Conference that it is inadvisable to hold more than
one such meeting a year at the headquarters. Of a
Wazarat, as it is believed that, if the number of such
meetings is multiplied, many Zaildars will be
unwilling to attend. It has been pointed out that
under present conditions Zaildars are put to much
inconvenience in visiting District headquarters.
because there is no suitable building in which they
can be accommodated; this is a matter which should
receive the attention of the State authorities.
MUNICIPILITY
The following views in regard
to Municipalities have been' expressed and deserve
consideration.
ELECTORAL
It is considered that the
electoral rolls should be revised in such a way as to
make the numbers recorded thereon equivalent to about
ten per cent of the total population of each
Municipality. At present the number of voters appears
to be considerably less than this in the case of
Srinagar city.
SEPARATE ELECTORATES
In view of the opinions
expressed in regard to the undesirable effects of
joint electorates in the matter of communal tension it
is suggested that the question of substituting
separate electorates should receive attention.
NUMBER OF ELECTED MEMBERS
It is recommended that the
proportion of elected members who now form 50 per cent
of the total, should be slightly increased so as to
provide for an elected majority. An increase in the
total number of Municipal members does not appear to
be desirable in the interests of efficiency.
EXTENSION OF POWERS
It is understood that the
Municipal Committee of Srinagar has
already put forward proposals to the
Minister-in-Charge for an increase of powers, and that
the matter is under the consideration of His Highness'
Government; and early decision appears to be
desirable.
NON-OFFICIAL PRESIDENT
The proposal that
Municipalities should be presided over by a
non-official is far from meeting with universal
approval. No recommendation in this direction appears
at present to be justified.
DELAY IN AWARDING
COMPENSATION
It is represented that
Municipal Committees at present allow great delay to
occur in paying compensation for property acquired
etc. Endeavours should be made to expedite the
disposal of such cases.
(Sd) B.J. Glancy
President
Constitutional Reforms Conference
|