Interim
Report of the Basic Principles Committee, 1952
Legal
Document No 125
Third Session,
10th June, 1952.
While proceeding with the task assigned to it,
the Basic Principles Committee has felt it imperative
to seek a clear directive from the Constituent
Assembly with regard to the basic character and shape
of the future constitution of the Jammu and Kashmir
State. In order to determine its broad framework it is
essential to know whether it will be based on the
total application of the principles of democracy or
whether the existing system of constitutional monarchy
should continue. This naturally involves an immediate
consideration of the future status of the Ruling dynasty
of the Jammu and Kashmir State and only a decision on
this fundamental issue will enable the Committee to
proceed further with the task of finalizing the
principles of the draft constitution.
The Committee has carefully examined the nature of
the title and claim of the Ruling Dynasty of the Jammu
and Kashmir State, which it derived from the Treaty of
1846. The Committee has no doubt that the Treaty was
the natural consequence of the British Imperial policy
in the Indian subcontinent which perpetuated and
intensified feudal and autocratic rule in certain
territories of the sub-continent.
When the popular upsurge for independence compelled
the British Government to withdraw from the
sub-continent, the Paramountcy exercised by it over
these States lapsed and it was obvious that the
iniquitous relationships which the 'British Government
had entered into with the Indian Princes -would
automatically terminate. But the failure of the
British Government to recognise a status of equality
and independence
On par with status conferred upon the people of the
Provinces ruled by it directed, created an anomalous
situation. While in the rest of India' sovereignty was
restored to the people, in the Indian states, it
continued to be vested in an individual who was all
along functioning under the protection and suzerainty
of the British Government.
The people of our State, along with those of other
Indian States, resisted this relationship which
condemned them to bondage and feudal exploitation.
Their resentment found expression in their organised
struggles against this unjust and discriminatory
treatment meted out to them. They sought repudiation
of this ambiguous constitutional arrangement and
demanded the right of self-determination for
themselves, prompted by the same urges that had moved
the people in other parts of India.
The outmoded and anachronistic character of the
dynastic rule was brought to light sharply by the
crisis with which the State was faced in 1947. The
general feeling of resentment against this autocratic
system had corroded it to such an extent as left no
doubt in its futility and incompetence to render
elementary functions of guaranteeing the security of
life and property of the citizens in times of a severe
crisis. It was, therefore, natural that this unpopular
system should yield place to a representative form of
Government; but the nature and magnitude of the
emergency facing our State made it impossible to
effect any drastic changes in the constitutional set
up during these critical times. The peoples
representatives while tackling the difficult task of
administration under stress of abnormal condition had
to function within the framework of the existing
constitutional set up.
There was a major change in the situation when in
March 1948, the Maharaja had to entrust the work of
day to day administration to a popular Ministry but it
was soon obvious that this arrangement could not work
smoothly and stood in the way of progress and
development. Consequently, the Maharaja who was
conscious of his erstwhile power and privileges,
incapable of any adjustment to the changed conditions,
was forced to retire and was succeeded by Yuvaraj
Karan Single, who assumed the functions of a
constitutional Ruler acting on the advice and guidance
of his Cabinet.
This was obviously an interim arrangement subject
to examination and revision by a properly elected body
of the people's representatives. Accordingly the
Constituent Assembly came into being in October 1951,
with sovereign powers.
The Basic Principles Committee feels that the time
has come when a final decision should be taken in
regard to the institu-unbounded respect, confidence
and esteem of the people.
In view of these considerations the Committee feels
that there must be a sense of finality about the
decisions in regard to this fundamental issue.
Accordingly, the Committee recommends that:
- the form of the future constitution of Jammu and
Kashmir shall be wholly democratic;
- the institution of hereditary Rulership shall be
terminated.
- the office of the Head of the State shall be
elective.
Sd/-
S.M. Abdullah.
G.M. Bakshi
M.A. Beg
G.L. Dogra
S.L. Saraf
D.P. Dhar
Piar Singh
Harbans Singh
Mubarik Shah
G.M. Hamdani
Mir Qasim
Bhagat Ram Sharma
Abdul Gani Goni
Ram Devi
Moti Ram Baigra
Ram Piara Saraf
Mir Assadullah
|