Return Process Only a Grave Refoulement
by Dr. Ajay Chrungoo
The state
government notification, for recruitment of displaced Kashmiri Hindus (Kashmiri
Migrants) as per the Prime Minister’s package, incorporates a new definition of
who is a ‘Migrant’, which has profound implications. This definition when read
together with the ‘agreement’ which the selected candidate has to sign provides
a comprehensive picture of the mindset of the state government.
As per the notification
‘Migrant Means A Person’ who “has migrated from Kashmir valley after 1st
November, 1989 and is registered as such with the Relief Commissioner or has not
been so registered on the ground of his being in service of Government in any
moving office, or having left the valley or any other part of the State in
pursuit of occupation or vocation or otherwise and is possessed of immovable
property at the place from where he has migrated but is unable to ordinarily
reside there due to the disturbed conditions and includes an internally
displaced person, for the purpose of the clause an internally displaced person
means a person who had to migrate within valley from his original place of
residence in Kashmir valley for reasons of security and is registered as such
with the Relief and Rehabilitation Commissioner Migrants.” The state
government while starting the recruitment process for the Prime Minister’s
package has chosen to modify the definition of the ‘migrant’ which guided the
policy of the state government so far.
The new definition for
migrants incorporates the following qualification, “…. and includes an
internally displaced person, for the purpose of the clause an internally
displaced person means a person who had to migrate within valley from its
original residence in Kashmir valley for reasons of security and is registered
as such with the Relief and Rehabilitation Commissioner Migrants.” Till now the
state government recognized only those as migrants, who had migrated from valley
after November, 1989. Now it seeks to recognize persons living in valley, who
have shifted from one place of valley to the other for security reasons, also as
migrants.
A story, which is in
circulation amongst the displaced Kashmiri Hindus in Jammu, may help us to
understand the purpose and purport of the modification in the definition of the
‘migrant’. Before the state cabinet eventually decided to start the recruitment
drive for around 3000 posts for the ‘Migrants’, for which central government had
committed the financial assistance as per the Prime minister’s package, news
papers in Jammu reported on several occasions the decision of the state cabinet
to go ahead with the recruitment drive. People in Jammu were baffled as to why
the same decision was being taken repeatedly by the government. After one such
news paper report, that the state government has decided to go ahead with the
recruitment drive, a group of Kashmiri Hindu activists were reportedly prodded
by a journalist friend to go to the Revenue Minister to thank him for the same.
The activists reportedly met the Minister who told them that no such decision
had been taken by the state cabinet till then and also informed them that they
had a wrong notion that they were the only migrants. He reportedly told them
that Kashmiri Pandits constituted only a small fraction of migrants of Kashmir
and they should not expect more than a few hundred jobs. The activists’
delegation returned dejected after meeting the Minister and complained to their
journalist friend who had arranged for the meeting. While discussing the issue
at Press club a Congress leader, who happened to be there, reportedly told them
that the State Cabinet had in fact discussed the issue but the NC leader and the
senior Cabinet Minister Abdul Rahim Rather had opposed the move vehemently and
also suggested that the Kashmiri Hindus were not the only migrants and there
were many migrants living in the valley itself. The story, true or a
rumor, however became the talk of the town for
Kashmiri Hindus living in Jammu. The motives of the State Government became
clear after the notification was published and modified definition of 'migrant'
came to public light.
This modified definition of
‘migrant’, when seen together with the ‘agreement’ which the selected candidate
has to furnish before joining, completes the picture of the mind set guiding the
state government. The new definition empowers the government to recruit persons
amongst the locals in the valley for the Prime Minister’s package which was
essentially devised for persons displaced from the valley. And the ‘agreement’
that in case the newly recruited employee migrates from Kashmir valley again ‘at
any stage for any reasons whatsoever, he will automatically stand terminated
from services and shall have no claim against any post under the State’,
ensures that the new recruit accepts the social and political order in the
valley totally and unconditionally.
The grim irony of the whole
process is that the state government has vehemently opposed the employment
package for the displaced Kashmiri Hindus outside the valley on the plea that
the situation has improved significantly on the ground in the Valley and at the
same time sought to enlarge the definition of the ‘migrant’ by claiming that
there has been internal displacement within the valley itself from one place to
another in recent years because of security reasons and such persons should also
be treated at par with ‘migrants’ outside the valley.
The intentions of the state
government are brazen enough to be missed. The State government by opposing the
employment outside the valley creates condition of attrition for the Kashmiri
Hindus not to avail of the opportunity of a job for which the Central government
has furnished the necessary resources. It also seeks to take a significant slice
out of the employment package by creating a new category of migrants living in
the valley and creating space for Muslim recruitment. To the secret list
of Muslim migrants in Jammu and the Political migrants whose names and
whereabouts have always been kept under the warps, one more secret list of
migrants who are internally displaced within the valley itself must have been
already added well before the recruitment drive started. At the same time
the State government resorts to strip the employee of all fundamental rights by
making him or her sign an agreement of the type already referred to here.
November 9-10, 1936, in the
history of Jewish holocaust, has come to be known as Kristallnacht (Night of
Broken Glass) outside the Germany and ‘Night of Pogrom’ within the Germany. That
night Nazis looted and then destroyed thousands of Jewish homes and business
establishment in every part of the country in Germany. After the Kristallnacht
writes Richard Rubenstein, “the hoodlums were banished and the bureaucrat took
over.” In the weeks that followed key Nazi officials led by Henirich Himmler saw
to it that the measures against the Jews were strictly ‘legal’. Kristallnacht
started for Kashmiri Hindus in the latest phase of their genocide after the
locks of Ram Temple in Ayodhya were opened in December1986 and the Muslim
vengeance was wrecked on Kashmiri Hindus in Anantnag with the burning and
looting of Hindu houses and plunder and desecration of Hindu Temples. But the
Kristallnacht didn’t abate after a few days for Kashmiri Hindus. It emerged in
its full fury on 19 January, 1990 and continued thereafter till whole of the
Hindu habitat in the Valley was destroyed. The bureaucrats and the political
class in the valley had taken over well before the unleashing of destruction to
make many of the acts of attrition to look perfectly ‘legal ‘and their control
has only strengthened since then.
When the displaced
population was named as ‘migrant’ it was an act of ‘legal’ attrition seeking to
dispossess the victim even the sympathy of the population willing to help and
deprive them of the help of any proper legal framework which could have guided
the government policies.
Almost all aspect of the
handling of the problem of Kashmiri Hindus, in exile
where they were in a relative safety from the direct physical assault of the
perpetrators, have been subjected to this legal and administrative attrition. At
the peak of militancy in early 90’s promotion orders of migrant employees were
issued posting the promoted Kashmiri Hindu women folk in the areas like Kupwara
which were remote and in the grip of militancy. All the women folk at that time
chose to forgo their promotion orders and the vacant positions were duly filled
from amongst the local Muslim. The processes of usurpation chosen was given a
veneer to appear perfectly legal When land and property records were allowed to
be tampered with and Hindu properties fraudulently occupied or encroached upon
the perpetrators used again a methodology to give an impression that usurpation
was 'legal' Prolonged and protracted litigation by displaced Kashmiri Hindus to
salvage their properties is a saga of struggle in extreme penury.
Bureaucrats and the communal
establish-ment took over to decide the parameters of ex-gratia relief or
insurance claims for the Hindu properties burnt and destroyed in the Valley. A
cursory comparison with the parameters of relief and cash assistance given to
the residents who had suffered damage during the earthquake in the valley will
bring out in ample measure the mindset at work. It took almost hundred orders
for the government to restore the basic rights of the ‘migrant employee’. For
each order to materialize the displaced Hindu employees had to wage a relentless
struggle of protests, dharnas and rallies in scorching heat. Hundreds of them
perished during these mobilization drives because of heat strokes.
More recent example is about
the HRA-CCA allowance for the displaced employees which had been denied to most
of them all these years. Employees went to the State High Court for the
redressal of their problems. Even after the double bench of High Court upheld
the plea of the employees. But the State Government refused to restore the right
and instead chose to challenge the verdict in the Supreme Court. The State
Government plea was dismissed by the Supreme Court as well. It is now months
since the Supreme Court dismissed the government plea but the State government
is yet to move in the matter. In the process hundreds of employees have retired
and those who are in service are still not sure whether they will eventually get
the benefit which was always their right.
The attrition in exile has
assumed the legal form guided by the perpetrators and collaborators of genocide
within the government and the political establishment. The phenomenon is
manifest glaringly in the return policy of the government. The policy is being
used to force the victim to conform and submit or face the spectre of abject
destitution and perish. The recruitment drive for ‘Kashmiri migrants’ is
basically a process to strip him of his right to live with dignity and honour.
What the government is doing
is brazen and yet those who should act are refusing to see the writing on the
wall. Joseph Goebbels once confided about his methods in a confidential meeting
with the German Journalists, “ up to now we have succeeded in leaving the enemy
in the dark concerning Germany’s real goals.. just 1932 our domestic foes never
saw where we were going or that our oath of legality was just a trick… we wanted
to come to power legally, but we did not use power legally… they could have
suppressed us..... They could have arrested a couple of us in 1925 and that
would have been that, the end. No they let us through the danger zone…. They let
us alone and let us slip through the risky zone and we were able to sail around
all dangerous reefs.” Kashmiri Hindus are being subjected to a new phase of
genocidal attrition by an enemy who is thinking that it has crossed the ‘danger
zone’ and can now wage the war with more confidence. The government of India is
living in a twilight between “knowing and unknowing” and is refusing the ‘full
realization of facts because it feels unable to face the implications of these
facts’. Kashmiri Hindus cannot afford to refuse to see the facts because the
genocide is far from having abated. The return process initiated by the
government is not a rehabilitation process but only a grave refoulment.
*(The
author heads Panun Kashmir)
Source: Kashmir
Sentinel
|